- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/11/19 at 6:35 am to Globetrotter747
Mustangs are terrible now
Posted on 1/11/19 at 6:51 am to SECdragonmaster
quote:
The C6 Vette is better than the Mustang in every comparable measure other than cost.
Just to prove a point:
Rear suspension design.
Posted on 1/11/19 at 7:02 am to bee Rye
quote:
Mustangs are terrible now
Actually, starting at 2015 the Mustangs are great cars. Tons of power, good handling, and a pretty nice interior.
Posted on 1/11/19 at 7:24 am to Globetrotter747
corvette without a doubt
Posted on 1/11/19 at 7:24 am to M. A. Ryland
These guys saying the mustangs are terrible and butt ugly must not remember the mid to late 70s mustangs.
The new ones are awesome, as are the new corvettes, power and performance wise.
The new ones are awesome, as are the new corvettes, power and performance wise.
Posted on 1/11/19 at 7:31 am to Globetrotter747
Being that you’re looking at a 5 year old corvette I would say go with the mustang that is under warranty because you probably can’t afford maintenance on the vette.
ETA I’m not being an OT snob...vettes are really expensive to maintain
ETA I’m not being an OT snob...vettes are really expensive to maintain
This post was edited on 1/11/19 at 7:32 am
Posted on 1/11/19 at 7:34 am to Globetrotter747
Mustang over a C6. You will never use either car to it's potential anyway.
C7 over a Mustang.
C7 over a Mustang.
Posted on 1/11/19 at 7:38 am to X123F45
quote:
Just to prove a point: Rear suspension design.
Wait, are you saying the mustangs is better? Because it isn't by a long shot. The vette uses composite transverse leafs front and rear which has numerous advantages over coil spring set ups. Far less weight, lower center of gravity, doubles as a anti-rollbar. People hear leaf spring and mistakenly think of truck suspension and a solid axle... not remotely close to the patented technology the vette uses.
Posted on 1/11/19 at 7:50 am to Globetrotter747
Uh... Corvette.
Posted on 1/11/19 at 8:08 am to Globetrotter747
Neither. Camaro Zl1
Posted on 1/11/19 at 8:13 am to Globetrotter747
If you want to drive slowly through town, get the Corvette.
If you want to crash into a crowd of pedestrians after doing a burnout, go Mustang.
If you want to crash into a crowd of pedestrians after doing a burnout, go Mustang.
Posted on 1/11/19 at 8:14 am to Globetrotter747
How about a used M4?
Posted on 1/11/19 at 8:16 am to Globetrotter747
The new A90 Supra:
B58 I-6T with Toyota tweaks.
B58 I-6T with Toyota tweaks.
Posted on 1/11/19 at 8:54 am to X123F45
quote:
Just to prove a point:
Rear suspension design.
The Vette's suspension is probably always going to be better because it's basically moving closer into supercar territory, but the Mustangs have had four wheel independent suspension since the 2015 model year and magnetorheological adaptive suspension since 2018.
The "fabled" Mustang live axle has been killed and buried.
This post was edited on 1/11/19 at 8:57 am
Posted on 1/11/19 at 8:57 am to M. A. Ryland
quote:terribly ugly
Actually, starting at 2015 the Mustangs are great cars. Tons of power, good handling, and a pretty nice interior
Posted on 1/11/19 at 8:59 am to CaptainsWafer
quote:just because Mustangs were terrible looking in the past, doesn't make them great looking now
These guys saying the mustangs are terrible and butt ugly must not remember the mid to late 70s mustangs.
Posted on 1/11/19 at 9:02 am to Globetrotter747
Apples and Oranges.
One is a muscle car for white trash. It competes with the Dodge Challenger and Chevy Camaro.
The other is a sports car for middle aged men experiencing a mid life crisis. It competes with Porsches and a bunch of other German and British douchebag mobiles.
Of course I would get the Corvette.
If you don’t live in a trailer, are experiencing a mid life crisis, and are delusional enough to think Ford knows their way around an automobile...the $70,000 Raptor pickup is what the blue oval is aiming towards you. Not the Mustang.
Ford does have a high performance supercar similar to some of the Italian exotics, but they only sell a handful per year.
One is a muscle car for white trash. It competes with the Dodge Challenger and Chevy Camaro.
The other is a sports car for middle aged men experiencing a mid life crisis. It competes with Porsches and a bunch of other German and British douchebag mobiles.
Of course I would get the Corvette.
If you don’t live in a trailer, are experiencing a mid life crisis, and are delusional enough to think Ford knows their way around an automobile...the $70,000 Raptor pickup is what the blue oval is aiming towards you. Not the Mustang.
Ford does have a high performance supercar similar to some of the Italian exotics, but they only sell a handful per year.
This post was edited on 1/11/19 at 9:11 am
Posted on 1/11/19 at 9:10 am to Globetrotter747
Neither. Mopar man
Posted on 1/11/19 at 9:35 am to 50_Tiger
Did Toyota use leftover Scion front ends for the Supra?
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News