- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Moderna coronavirus vaccine offers immunity for...at least 3 months
Posted on 12/4/20 at 11:06 am to Fun Bunch
Posted on 12/4/20 at 11:06 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
Researchers say it is “not yet established” whether the antibodies translate to protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection, but the results do imply that the vaccine has the potential to offer “durable immunity” against disease.
“Our findings provide support for the use of a 100-µg dose of mRNA-1273 in an ongoing phase 3 trial, which has recently shown a 94.5% efficacy rate in an interim analysis,” researchers concluded.
What’s the point?
0
Posted on 12/4/20 at 11:06 am to Salmon
quote:
misleading thread
It's the OT, what do you expect?
Posted on 12/4/20 at 11:06 am to nerd guy
quote:
For fricks sake, I don't get some of you people.
I'm one of the biggest defenders of the vaccines on this board, so...barking up the wrong tree.
Posted on 12/4/20 at 11:06 am to Sasquatch Smash
quote:
I don't think that's quite true. A month or so ago they were up to like 30 worldwide.
I've seen some of those 30. One of them was a guy in the Houston area (I think) who made big news across the country because they said he had contracted it 3 times. They never did really prove it, and we didn't hear anything of it after the week or so of media hand wringing and fear pimping.
Posted on 12/4/20 at 11:07 am to Winston Cup
And we also don’t know what other long term effects are caused by frickin around with mRNA. Sounds sketchy as hell
Posted on 12/4/20 at 11:07 am to Teddy Ruxpin
quote:
Yes there are hundreds now, which is like .0000001% reinfection rate and exceedingly rare.
Oh, I know. Wasn't using that as a thing to say "immunity is impossible!"
Posted on 12/4/20 at 11:07 am to nerd guy
quote:
It's the OT, what do you expect?
Its the title of the article and literally from research.
Posted on 12/4/20 at 11:07 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
I'm one of the biggest defenders of the vaccines on this board, so...barking up the wrong tree.
then whats the point of this thread?
because you know most people are only going to read your thread title
Posted on 12/4/20 at 11:07 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
roduced high levels of binding and neutralizing antibodies that declined slightly over time, as expected, but they remained elevated in all participants 3 months after the booster [second] vaccination,” the doctors wrote.
They only have about 3 months worth of data, it doesn't mean it only lasts three months.
Posted on 12/4/20 at 11:08 am to Salmon
quote:
it seems to me that they are saying that they still have immunity after 3 months NOT that it only last 3 months
misleading thread
quote:
immunity for...at least 3 months
Literally what I said.
It offers immunity for at least 3 months.
Posted on 12/4/20 at 11:08 am to Fun Bunch
Have you received your quarterly vaccine yet comrade ?
Posted on 12/4/20 at 11:08 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
It offers immunity for at least 3 months.
because they have only had the vaccine for 3 months!
Posted on 12/4/20 at 11:08 am to Salmon
quote:
then whats the point of this thread?
because you know most people are only going to read your thread title
Which says we have immunity for at least 3 months, which is also the title of the news article on it.
Posted on 12/4/20 at 11:09 am to Salmon
Until we can get 100% guarantee immunity last at least a year and 100% guarantee the vaccine is safe, we arent going back to normal
That is where the bar has been set
That is where the bar has been set
Posted on 12/4/20 at 11:09 am to Winston Cup
quote:
the test subjects are only at 3 months. we dont know a long term outcome because one hasnt been observed yet.
Exactly. I mean. FFS, it’s legitimate to wonder how long immunity will last, but they can’t claim immunity for longer than their test subjects have had the shot.
Posted on 12/4/20 at 11:10 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
Its the title of the article and literally from research.
The title of the article is "Moderna coronavirus vaccine offers immunity for at least 3 months, researchers suggest". Not your title. Both are clickbait.
Posted on 12/4/20 at 11:10 am to Salmon
quote:
it seems to me that they are saying that they still have immunity after 3 months NOT that it only last 3 months
misleading thread
The fact that it's not an immediate cure-all will give every level of government the reason they need to extend these lockdowns indefinitely
Posted on 12/4/20 at 11:10 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
Which says we have immunity for at least 3 months, which is also the title of the news article on it.
you are being obtuse
the non negative way to present this would be to say
"3 months after receiving vaccination, recipients still have antibodies"
Posted on 12/4/20 at 11:11 am to Fun Bunch
Lmao, two doses to get 3 months of “immunity”
Im good.
Im good.
Posted on 12/4/20 at 11:11 am to upgrayedd
quote:Yep
The fact that it's not an immediate cure-all will give every level of government the reason they need to extend these lockdowns indefinitely
Until it is a guarantee, we arent really going to move past phase 3 type living
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News