- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Middle school student may soon face charges on 32 counts of child porn after fight
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:36 pm to tigerstripedjacket
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:36 pm to tigerstripedjacket
Can schools confiscate and search items that belong to students?
Yes if they have reasonable suspicion, which is different from probable cause for police. LINK
The teacher, principal, school security guard, or administrator may search the person of a student or his personal effects when, based on the attendant circumstances at the time of the search, there are reasonable grounds to suspect that the search will reveal evidence that the student has violated the law, a school rule, or a school board policy. Such a search shall be conducted in a manner that is reasonably related to the purpose of the search and not excessively intrusive in light of the age or sex of the student and the nature of the suspected offense.
Yes if they have reasonable suspicion, which is different from probable cause for police. LINK
The teacher, principal, school security guard, or administrator may search the person of a student or his personal effects when, based on the attendant circumstances at the time of the search, there are reasonable grounds to suspect that the search will reveal evidence that the student has violated the law, a school rule, or a school board policy. Such a search shall be conducted in a manner that is reasonably related to the purpose of the search and not excessively intrusive in light of the age or sex of the student and the nature of the suspected offense.
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:36 pm to DavidTheGnome
15 yrs old Middle Schooler?
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:36 pm to tigerstripedjacket
quote:
The parents are in even deeper shite if they know he has kiddie porn on there and they pay the bill
Sure, but I'd venture to guess a 15 yr old isn't bragging to his parents about getting some nudes.
I realize there are programs to monitor phones and content.
Will be a tough lesson for everyone involved.
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:39 pm to Yewkindewit
quote:
15 yrs old Middle Schooler?
West Monroe, probably held back to play football
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:39 pm to ThatMakesSense
The boy is a student in Middle School
So he is likely 12-13 years old.......
If he gets charged with kiddie or for pictures of someone older than him we have lost all common sense
So he is likely 12-13 years old.......
If he gets charged with kiddie or for pictures of someone older than him we have lost all common sense
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:43 pm to lsupride87
Confiscating the phone of someone involved in a fight even seems nonsensical. Are there POV Worldstar videos?
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:46 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
middle school student
quote:
15-year old
This is the problem. My son is still 14 and just finished his first year of high school. He should not be around 12-13 year old girls.
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:47 pm to DavidTheGnome
Why are they going through the kids phones after being confiscated?
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:49 pm to DavidTheGnome
Sooooo, if you're 15 years old and have naked pictures of other 15 year olds, it's child porn?
By that logic, when two 15 year olds have sex, they should both be arrested for sexual relations with a minor.
By that logic, when two 15 year olds have sex, they should both be arrested for sexual relations with a minor.
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:52 pm to dcrews
quote:
when two 15 year olds have sex, they should both be arrested for sexual relations with a minor
If that act could be distributed, it would be prevented.
Because photos can be distributed, and are basically impossible to retrieve they are prohibited.
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:53 pm to DavidTheGnome
I understand why the laws exist, but this is dumb. If he’s charged, the girls need to be, as well.
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:55 pm to DavidTheGnome
I love how he gets busted, but no one is arresting the chicks who sent him pics.
Female privilege.
Female privilege.
Posted on 5/21/18 at 7:04 pm to Jcorye1
If found guilty he will be branded a sex offender for life
Posted on 5/21/18 at 7:08 pm to tigerstripedjacket
quote:
“Same age” is a very slippery slope.
No it’s not.
Make it two years.
Posted on 5/21/18 at 7:26 pm to dcrews
quote:
By that logic, when two 15 year olds have sex, they should both be arrested for sexual relations with a minor.
With which crime should we punish 15-year-old who masturbate?
Posted on 5/21/18 at 7:30 pm to tigerstripedjacket
quote:
Because photos can be distributed, and are basically impossible to retrieve they are prohibited.
So having a photo of a girl is worse than fricking her?
The law doesn't make any sense when applied to minors.
Posted on 5/21/18 at 7:33 pm to DavidTheGnome
This sick fricker is a pedo. Lock him up.
Posted on 5/21/18 at 7:34 pm to fr33manator
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/21/18 at 7:35 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News