- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Middle school student may soon face charges on 32 counts of child porn after fight
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:09 pm
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:09 pm
LINK
WEST MONROE, La. - According to sources close to the investigation, a middle school student is in trouble with the law after under-age pornography is found on his phone.
Two West Ridge Students were in a fight at school last Friday.
After the fight, the cell phones of those near the fight were confiscated.
One student in the fight reportedly had 32 explicit pictures of underage girls on his phone.
Investigators tell us they are continuing to look into the case.
The phone reportedly belonged to a 15-year-old whose name has not yet been released.
The student could soon face charges of second degree battery and 32 counts of possessing child pornography.
There is no word as of yet whether other students are charged in the fight.
Watch it be his girlfriend or some shite.
WEST MONROE, La. - According to sources close to the investigation, a middle school student is in trouble with the law after under-age pornography is found on his phone.
Two West Ridge Students were in a fight at school last Friday.
After the fight, the cell phones of those near the fight were confiscated.
One student in the fight reportedly had 32 explicit pictures of underage girls on his phone.
Investigators tell us they are continuing to look into the case.
The phone reportedly belonged to a 15-year-old whose name has not yet been released.
The student could soon face charges of second degree battery and 32 counts of possessing child pornography.
There is no word as of yet whether other students are charged in the fight.
Watch it be his girlfriend or some shite.
30
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:10 pm to DavidTheGnome
So lame if they are his age, and happen to be minors.
Glad I grew up riding the first wave of cell phone tech
Glad I grew up riding the first wave of cell phone tech
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:11 pm to DavidTheGnome
Damn a 15 year old got more nudes in 15 years then I did my whole life.
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:13 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
After the fight, the cell phones of those near the fight were confiscated.
Why?
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:14 pm to DavidTheGnome
Should be inadmissible evidence.
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:15 pm to DavidTheGnome
That’s what he gets for liking girls his own age. Why can’t he be like every other normal kid and just bone his math teacher.
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:16 pm to DavidTheGnome
It’s so absurd if they’re the same age.
There is no common sense in our laws.
There is no common sense in our laws.
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:18 pm to ThatMakesSense
quote:
Why?
Worldstar of course. The first thing that kids do nowadays is pull out their phone and start filming.
This post was edited on 5/21/18 at 6:22 pm
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:21 pm to DavidTheGnome
wont fly if they're all the same age as him
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:23 pm to ThatMakesSense
quote:
After the fight, the cell phones of those near the fight were confiscated.
The way it's worded it sounds like the kid with the nude pics wasn't even involved in the fight.
quote:
Why?
Possibly to see if anyone recorded who started the fight. Some schools also have no cell-phone policies, so if a teacher sees you with a phone out, it can be confiscated.
This post was edited on 5/21/18 at 6:24 pm
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:23 pm to atxfan
quote:
Worldstar of course
Ahhh. Of course. Would there be legal recourse for confiscating a phone not owned by an individual? I can't imagine many 15 yr olds are paying their phone bill. Especially if you want to charge my kid with 32 counts of 'child porn'
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:24 pm to Sao
quote:
Should be inadmissible evidence.
En loco parentis/reasonable suspicion rule.
Schools are not held to the same standard as police in matters regarding student best interest.
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:25 pm to DavidTheGnome
Good. Lock this sicko up. That’s somebody’s daughter
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:27 pm to ThatMakesSense
quote:
Would there be legal recourse for confiscating a phone not owned by an individual?
Not sure how it would stand up legally (especially with searching the contents of the phone), but at some schools, parents and students sign a contract at the beginning of the year which states that they are aware phones aren't allowed and that they will be confiscated if seen and how or IF you can even get them back.
This post was edited on 5/21/18 at 6:28 pm
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:28 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
so absurd if they’re the same age. There is no common sense in our laws.
“Same age” is a very slippery slope. Would you allow him to have pictures of 14 year olds? 13 year olds? 12 year olds?
Do you allow pictures only of those who willingly sent it directly to him or do you also allow those that were shared with him without consent from the young woman?
Does same age mean those who were his age when received? Can an 18 year old possess photos of a 10 year old if he received them when he was ten and kept them?
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:30 pm to tigerstripedjacket
Common sense would dictate the correct answers to all of those questions.
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:32 pm to DavidTheGnome
I admit I didn't read the article, but if he's just 15 or whatever and has multiple pics of other 15 year old girls who are classsmates of his, he's probably destined for greatness as a future player.
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:34 pm to ThatMakesSense
quote:
Would there be legal recourse for confiscating a phone not owned by an individual
The parents are in even deeper shite if they know he has kiddie porn on there and they pay the bill.
Without consent, minors can not be filmed, and the phones can be legally confiscated.
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:34 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
Investigators tell us they are continuing to look into the case.
I bet they are. Perverts.
Posted on 5/21/18 at 6:35 pm to Kvothe
Are they gonna charge all the girls who sent the nudes with distribution of child porn?
Because applying these laws like this is stupid.
Because applying these laws like this is stupid.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News