- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Louisiana COVID-19 - July 6, 2020 Update: 66,327 cases - 3,188 deaths - 813,645 tested
Posted on 7/6/20 at 1:20 pm to lsupride87
Posted on 7/6/20 at 1:20 pm to lsupride87
You're assuming testing remain constant in your chart.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 1:21 pm to LSUJML
Hey -- how's this? I spoke with the ADON at my facility today and was told that they're no longer requiring negative tests for NEW ADMITS. BUT they still cannot be admitted without a negative TB test. W. T. F.
Wasn't the homes decision -- either the corporate office OR CMS or whomever. Still testing weekly all residents/employees who haven't been affected already.
Wasn't the homes decision -- either the corporate office OR CMS or whomever. Still testing weekly all residents/employees who haven't been affected already.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 1:21 pm to tiger91
quote:
Both state that the majority of covid patients are on the floor in a NON ICU BED. This in itself leads me to absolutely believe that these stays are different.
Yes because everyone being admitted for other diseases are being tested. When they find a positive that’s a covid hospitalization because they require isolation even though they are admitted for pancreatitis.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 1:23 pm to tiger91
quote:
But the retired ER doc who was the doc at the walk in clinic in LFT who saw my daughter & tested her due to exposure (employer mandated it) said that employers shouldn't keep sending their "exposed" people over to be tested. Sigh.
Doctors aren't wrong here but the problem is the CDC recommendations recommend a negative test before returning to work. Doctors are viewing as a supply chain issue whereas employers/employees are trying to follow federal guidelines.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 1:24 pm to ML Crisis
quote:
We are three weeks from the start of this case rise, and deaths are still declining.......
Louisiana averaged 13.85 deaths a day over the last 7 days. Up from 12.42 the previous.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 1:29 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
is the CDC recommendations recommend a negative test before returning to work.
I thought they changed that??
From the CDC: Recommendation: For persons recovered from COVID-19 illness, CDC recommends that isolation be maintained for at least 10 days after illness onset and at least 3 days (72 hours) after recovery. Illness onset is defined as the date symptoms begin. Recovery is defined as resolution of fever without the use of fever-reducing medications with progressive improvement or resolution of other symptoms. Ideally, isolation should be maintained for this full period to the extent that it is practicable under rapidly changing circumstances. While this strategy can apply to most recovered persons, either a test-based strategy (if feasible) or a symptom-based strategy with more stringent requirements may be used for recovered persons for whom there is low tolerance for post-recovery SARS-CoV-2 shedding and infectious risk because they are:
Here's the link
Posted on 7/6/20 at 1:31 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
CDC recommendations recommend a negative test before returning to work.
Link?
Posted on 7/6/20 at 1:31 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
Yes because everyone being admitted for other diseases are being tested. When they find a positive that’s a covid hospitalization because they require isolation even though they are admitted for pancreatitis.
Guess we are just supposed to be cool with the numbers being manipulated like this?
If they aren't sick, and asymptomatic people don't transmit covid, why do they need to be isolated?
Posted on 7/6/20 at 1:31 pm to Weekend Warrior79
quote:
Sadly, it appears they updated it today- just through 6/30 instead of 7/05
That's strange.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 1:32 pm to fightin tigers
quote:No, im not
You're assuming testing remain constant in your chart.
Im simply showing people who expect this death spike to be like the first one are fools, it has already shown its nothing like the first rise in cases
Because the cases now are far different
Posted on 7/6/20 at 1:33 pm to LSUJML
quote:
JBE forced these people to be tested yet the state cannot process the tests in a timely manner
In fairness, the state is not performing many tests. The tests are being almost entirely performed by private labs.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 1:34 pm to ML Crisis
quote:
Also, I've read two different papers today that state that, because we have all been exposed to coronaviruses before, most of us can mount a strong immune response.
Link?
Posted on 7/6/20 at 1:35 pm to ML Crisis
quote:
Guess we are just supposed to be cool with the numbers being manipulated like this?
People on the internet make up and repeat unreliable shite all day long. Just because an anonymous poster on a chat board says it, doesn't make any of it true.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 1:37 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Im simply showing people who expect this death spike to be like the first one are fools, it has already shown its nothing like the first rise in cases
No, you are hoping it won't spike. You are using limited testing numbers against expanded testing numbers.
We are just now learning of how widespread the virus was at the peak despite testing showing much less spread.
Other factors play into a lower death rate, but your chart doesn't show that.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 1:38 pm to ML Crisis
quote:
and asymptomatic people don't transmit covid
That's not a "fact" at this point. There's been studies that claim that as true, and others that say it's false.
Regardless of "why" someone is given a covid test, if it's a positive test it should count as such. However, breaking down those type of cases would be helpful information, but I doubt you will ever see that
Posted on 7/6/20 at 1:40 pm to Cosmo
Here you go .. I also linked it above with a partial quote.
Maybe I just don't understand .. always a possibility lol.
Maybe I just don't understand .. always a possibility lol.
This post was edited on 7/6/20 at 1:42 pm
Posted on 7/6/20 at 1:48 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
No, you are hoping it won't spike
From majority congregate spreading in nursing homes to majority spread in the community
from median age of infection in the 60s to median age of infection in the 30s.
You acting like it isnt a given the death spike will be far lower means you have lost all of your sesnses. Unless you are now telling me you think this virus is as deadly to your common 30 year old as your common nursing home resident
This post was edited on 7/6/20 at 1:49 pm
Posted on 7/6/20 at 1:49 pm to tiger91
Maybe the reasoning is they are basically quarantined anyway
They have no interaction with other residents
They have no interaction with other residents
Posted on 7/6/20 at 1:52 pm to Cosmo
quote:
We will get an epic JBE lecture for daring to enjoy the 4th with our families Im sure
It's expected even though we won't see those results until after next weekend.
Popular
Back to top


1








