Started By
Message

re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Posted on 3/5/24 at 4:48 pm to
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139663 posts
Posted on 3/5/24 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

Let's be clear about what is happening in Europe.


Sounds like OJ declaring he's going to get to the bottom of the Nicole and Ron Goldman murder.

That takes gumption.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139663 posts
Posted on 3/5/24 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

If we were stupid enough to fly planes into Russian air space
We aren't. As you said, the Singapore stuff is absurd.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
150421 posts
Posted on 3/5/24 at 4:55 pm to
Yea. We did earlier but once Russia shot its 12th F35 down, per the Russian MOD and Russian media, we would never put our planes in danger like that
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45688 posts
Posted on 3/5/24 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

Yea. We did earlier but once Russia shot its 120th F35 down, per the Russian MOD and Russian media, we would never put our planes in danger like that




FIFY
This post was edited on 3/5/24 at 4:58 pm
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
16086 posts
Posted on 3/5/24 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

Not in Russian air space.


They circled Tehran with Russia's latest air defense installed there. Never were detected.

But I seriously doubt they over Ukraine or Russia, maybe a few flights in international airspace over the Black Sea.
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
16086 posts
Posted on 3/5/24 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

How can a land missile system become a submarine?


Is the Russian navy going to rename it the Dead Sea?
Posted by LSUPilot07
Member since Feb 2022
8657 posts
Posted on 3/5/24 at 5:13 pm to
I never said Russian airspace. I meant the most at all they would do would be fly Ukrainian airspace within a distance of the lines in the east or south. I really doubt even that. Ukraine needs to go full on defense and start digging in tight as a tick with layered defensive lines covered by minefields in front to help blunt Russian attacks. Ukraine is starting to get artillery shells trickling in so they can fire back but I would pull all the western tanks and IFVs back and have all the soviet tanks up front as fire support. Losing them is nothing compared to an Abrams or Leopard. You don’t have the materials to attack but you can still actively defend. You know the Russians go to tactic is the pincer move on whatever their target is so make sure your flanks are well dug in and supplied. Like it or not the next 12-18 months will be judged by the world on how little territory they surrender. It’s time for Ukraine to put their boot in the ground and hold the line for a while.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45688 posts
Posted on 3/5/24 at 5:56 pm to
quote:

I never said Russian airspace. I meant the most at all they would do would be fly Ukrainian airspace within a distance of the lines in the east or south. I really doubt even that. Ukraine needs to go full on defense and start digging in tight as a tick with layered defensive lines covered by minefields in front to help blunt Russian attacks. Ukraine is starting to get artillery shells trickling in so they can fire back but I would pull all the western tanks and IFVs back and have all the soviet tanks up front as fire support. Losing them is nothing compared to an Abrams or Leopard. You don’t have the materials to attack but you can still actively defend. You know the Russians go to tactic is the pincer move on whatever their target is so make sure your flanks are well dug in and supplied.


You are only partially right. Ukraine needs to get the western MBTs off the line and back to the training ground. There is a reason why there were a lot of the Leopard losses were at the start of the counteroffensive last summer and the M1A1s losses have been within a few weeks of being used in action and more Leopard2s are out of action because Ukrainian mechanics are causing more damage than the enemy is. The western military experts thought it would be better to train new recruits/conscripts because a 20 year old Ukrainian is more likely to speak English or German than a 40 year old Ukrainian. Not only were the crews sent for training rookies but they only received 10 weeks of training which is half the amount of training an American M1 crewman receives. Per my sauce(s) Ukrainian tankers including my friend were advocating for taking veteran crews with at least 3 months combat experience out of existing units and replacing them with the replacements and sending the veteran tank crews and mechanics to learn how to operate the western MBTS. Sure it would have taken longer because they would have likely needed interpreters but it would have saved lives. Just another example of Ukrainian lives being lost because it listened to the "western experts" instead of the people who had been fighting the Russians. Imagine how much more successful Ukraine's western MBTs would be if they had listened to their own tankers. Veteran Ukrainian tankers know not to stay still or move slowly out in the open. As my buddy says, "don't shoot and move; move and shoot. You might miss but you will live long enough to shoot again. Once you stop moving you stop breathing." The first M1A1 was destroyed sitting still and the 3rd one was just creeping along.

quote:

It’s time for Ukraine to put their boot in the ground and hold the line for a while.


Per my sauce(s) Syrski and a lot of the Ukrainian generals were telling Zelensky that last year. Zaluzhnyi was in favor of a counteroffensive last year and he was the one who was speaking daily with Lloyd Austin and the other western leaders who were needing a Ukrainian victory to shore up support on the homefront (i.e. the Netherlands, Germany, and Slovakia). Instead they got a Ukrainian L, a pro-Russian government in Slovakia, the Netherlands is under a caretaker government with Geert Wilders and the PPV as the largest party in the parliament, and Scholz's governing coalition is barely holding together.
This post was edited on 3/5/24 at 6:48 pm
Posted by No Colors
Sandbar
Member since Sep 2010
13499 posts
Posted on 3/5/24 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

WeeWee


So I've been meaning to ask you:

I don't know what the solution is to the Russian minefields. I understand that the "best and brightest" have been grinding on this problem for over a year. And maybe there's a crazy cool technology solution out there that we'll see in the next year or two. Which would be amazing.

Or maybe the solution exists but we're not willing to "burn it" on this conflict. Maybe we're keeping that ace in the hole for another day.

But the obvious answer when facing a minefield is: "go around it."

In this case, going around it means kicking off an offensive in Kharkiv that takes Belgorod and then loops back into the Russian rear.

With western MBTs and F16s this is the obvious play.

Other than the strategic politics of invading Russia proper, is there any tactical reason this won't work?
Posted by bigjoe1
Member since Jan 2024
1939 posts
Posted on 3/5/24 at 7:45 pm to
Been thinking about this as well.
When Wagner marched on Moscow they met very little organized resistance.
Could Ukraine muster enough air defense.
Posted by No Colors
Sandbar
Member since Sep 2010
13499 posts
Posted on 3/5/24 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

Could Ukraine muster enough air defense.


With F-16 I think it's possible.

The biggest issue I can think of is on Russia's ability to respond. They basically suck at maneuver warfare. They do OK in set piece battles.

Will they be able to extricate themselves from fixed fortifications, mount up, and counterattack 120 degrees from their deployment axis?

All the while being observed and hammered by HIMARS and GLSDB?

From all we know about their capabilities I think it's a stretch. They very well may either panic, or hunker down and freeze. Either one of which would be disastrous
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45688 posts
Posted on 3/5/24 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

So I've been meaning to ask you: is

I don't know what the solution is to the Russian minefields. I understand that the "best and brightest" have been grinding on this problem for over a year. And maybe there's a crazy cool technology solution out there that we'll see in the next year or two. Which would be amazing.

Or maybe the solution exists but we're not willing to "burn it" on this conflict. Maybe we're keeping that ace in the hole for another day.

But the obvious answer when facing a minefield is: "go around it."

In this case, going around it means kicking off an offensive in Kharkiv that takes Belgorod and then loops back into the Russian rear.

With western MBTs and F16s this is the obvious play.

Other than the strategic politics of invading Russia proper, is there any tactical reason this won't work?



Russia has fortified and mined the area between the Ukrainian border and Belgorod. It is less fortified and mined than their defenses down south. Invading Russia to get behind their frontlines is the obvious play but it's politically too risky. Besides the risk of Russia sending nukes toward Ukraine there is the risk that the apathetic Russians will rally behind the flag or Belarus or some of the other CTSO members might come to Russia's aid.

The same objective of getting around the Russian flank can be accomplished by staying in Ukraine’s internationally recognized borders.

Step-1: Ukraine needs to dig in and sit on the defensive and build their military for this year.

Step-2: Degrade Russian air defense and fighters.

Step-3: Take out the Kerch Straits Bridge and the road, rail bridges, and port facilities in between Mariupol and Crimea

Step-4: After the GLC between Russia and Crimea have been cut for a while launch a feint down south. Once Russia moves forces to reinforce the south. Use HIMARs, ATACAMs, cruise missile, drones, etc to disrupt the Russian supply lines into eastern Ukraine. There is a total of about 12 choke points on the road and rail network which if taken out would hamper Russia ability to supply the Donbas from Belgorod in the north, Millerovo and Kamensk-Shakhtinsky in the east, Rostov-on-Don in the south, as well as cut the main GLC that Russia uses to shift troops north and south.

Step-5: Further distract Russia by stoking the fires of political unrest next summer during the Belarusian elections next summer.

Step-6: As soon as the GLC are cut, clear a path and bulldoze a connection east and then south from the P07 highway north of the frontlines near Svatove to the T1307. This will allow an all out assault to bypass the Russian strongpoints of Svatove and Starobil's'k which would allow a push east along the T1307 starting at Traneve => Bilokurakyne => Novoposk => Markivka. BTW from what I can find on open source intel, once Ukraine gets past or around the frontline defenses which are only one line thick north and east of Svatove there are little to no prepared Russian defenses along the T1307 highway since that area is in between Russia and the its forces on the frontlines and it uses it as a supply route. Once in Markivka the UAF splits its. One part goes off road and continues east and north to reach the Russian border and protect their own flank. The rest of the forces turns south along the T1314. The UAF goes along the T1314 Markivka => Bilovodsk. Once in Bilovodsk UAF will be around the Russian defenses and able to cut off Luhansk city from Belgorod and attack Luhansk and the rest of the Donbas from the rear which is completely unprotected. I call it Donbas In the arse Plan (DIPA).

Step-7: Blockade the Zap oblast and crimea from the air.

Step-8: Negotiate peace from a position of strength.

Obviously the DIAP will require more than 17 ATACAMs and few dozen western cruise missiles. However, if the west actually gives Ukraine most of what it’s asking for the Ukrainians will be able to get past the Russian defense Svatove then the plan will work.
This post was edited on 3/5/24 at 9:07 pm
Posted by gizmothepug
Louisiana
Member since Apr 2015
8689 posts
Posted on 3/5/24 at 9:00 pm to
quote:

Singapore’s Minister of Defense, Ng Eng Hen, has announced that American F-35s have been actively engaged in missions over Ukraine. The objective of these missions is to pinpoint the exact locations of Russian anti-aircraft missile systems. “In recent activities, the United States has mobilized its F-35s to identify the deployment of Russian anti-aircraft missile systems within Ukraine. The gathered intelligence is subsequently disseminated to NATO countries,” shared the chief of Singapore’s military.


Why would we actively engage over a war zone with our F-35s to locate anti-aircraft systems? That seems like a lose, lose type of situation if God forbid something happens. I’m not saying it couldn’t happen, but the source and risk VS reward doesn’t make sense.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45688 posts
Posted on 3/5/24 at 9:09 pm to
quote:

If we were stupid enough to fly planes into Russian air spaceWe aren't. As you said, the Singapore stuff is absurd.


I did say that but I have learned to never underestimate the Pentagon’s stupidity.
Posted by LSUPilot07
Member since Feb 2022
8657 posts
Posted on 3/5/24 at 9:12 pm to
Any type of offensive besides the token active defense attack to push the Russians back in places and reset positions is all Ukraine can really do right now. The army is exhausted i’m sure so maybe playing defense letting the Russians bang their heads against entrenched Ukrainians and accurate artillery seems like the best play. Let the Russians tire themselves now. The only downside is you’re giving Russia more time to rearm while Ukraine does too. Every single cluster shell that can be found needs to be pulled out, no matter how old, and sent to the front. For the next year or so Ukraine needs to work hard on sending Russians back home in boxes by the train load.

Clearly the most offensive will be the continued attacks on Crimea by any means necessary and just holding ground in Ukraine. I agree that the experienced crews should have been given first option on the western tanks, that was a big mistake. It’s a good idea to put them back to the training ground but this time they need to send some of the soviet tank crews to learn on them because I do expect eventually Ukraine gets another package of Abrams and Bradleys once the funding is settled. I was under the impression that most of the Abrams crews were picked from Ukrainian T-80 crews because they had turbine engines like the M1A1. They should never be sitting g still though like they were. The Abrams shoots accurately on the move anyway so that’s just bad training and execution.
Posted by Trevaylin
south texas
Member since Feb 2019
11199 posts
Posted on 3/5/24 at 9:22 pm to
The last 6 months, I look into the sputnik news war progress report daily. It's about as biased as KJPierre, but in the last 8 weeks they have shown a very westward progress of the battle front. Ukraine is buckling
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88509 posts
Posted on 3/5/24 at 9:25 pm to
quote:

Why would we actively engage over a war zone with our F-35s to locate anti-aircraft systems? That seems like a lose, lose type of situation if God forbid something happens. I’m not saying it couldn’t happen, but the source and risk VS reward doesn’t make sense.


I mean I think when they send those up it’s with the understanding that if something happens they will cover it up or otherwise explain it away.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45688 posts
Posted on 3/5/24 at 9:31 pm to
quote:

I was under the impression that most of the Abrams crews were picked from Ukrainian T-80 crews because they had turbine engines like the M1A1.


No according to my former roommate, some of the T80 repair crews and maintenance workers were going to be sent to train in the M1A1, but Ukraine always was planning on sending rookies to operate the M1A1s.

quote:

They should never be sitting still. The Abrams shoots accurately on the move anyway so that’s just bad training and execution.


Agreed but what do you expect from a rushed training program? Ukraine needs to get its western MBTs but especially the M1A1s off the line and get its crews in the simulators.
This post was edited on 3/5/24 at 9:40 pm
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45688 posts
Posted on 3/5/24 at 9:32 pm to
quote:

The last 6 months, I look into the sputnik news war progress report daily. It's about as biased as KJPierre, but in the last 8 weeks they have shown a very westward progress of the battle front. Ukraine is buckling


Stidham is that you? Russia has moved like 20 km since October.
Posted by StormyMcMan
USA
Member since Oct 2016
4689 posts
Posted on 3/5/24 at 9:49 pm to
ISW Update

quote:

Key Takeaways:

Ukraine destroyed the Project 22160 Sergei Kotov large patrol ship of the Black Sea Fleet (BSF) off the coast of the Kerch Strait on the night of March 4-5.

Russian milbloggers responded to the sinking of the Sergei Kotov by decrying the Russian military command’s lack of response to the incident and mounting a wider critique against the bureaucratic inertia of the Russian military apparatus.

Russian aircraft appear to be continuing to conduct a relatively high volume of glide bomb strikes in Ukraine despite Ukrainian officials’ reports that Ukrainian forces have downed several bomber aircraft in recent weeks.

Russia and China are deepening their strategic space cooperation, including cooperation on satellite surveillance and space exploration.

The International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for two senior Russian commanders for their responsibility in perpetrating Russian war crimes – the first time the ICC has charged Russian military commanders.

Russian forces are reportedly operating a “black market” to sell Ukrainian prisoners of war (POWs), including to Russian paramilitary groups that may be conducting their own POW exchanges with Ukraine.

The director of the Moldovan Intelligence and Security Service, Alexandru Musteata, stated on March 5 that the Kremlin has begun to conduct multi-year hybrid operations aimed at destabilizing Moldova and preventing its accession to the EU.

Russian forces recently made confirmed advances near Donetsk City amid continued positional engagements along the entire line of contact on March 5.

Russian authorities are reportedly disbanding elements of the former Wagner Group that were supposed to join Rosgvardia or are currently in Belarus.

Russian law enforcement is likely intensifying crackdowns against Crimean Tatars in occupied Crimea.


first pageprev pagePage 3555 of 5046Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram