Started By
Message

re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Posted on 1/2/24 at 8:56 pm to
Posted by LSUandAU
Key West, FL & Malibu (L.A.), CA
Member since Apr 2009
5165 posts
Posted on 1/2/24 at 8:56 pm to
I corrected my post. 2% is agreed upon. Trump suggested 4% and the more the better.
Posted by LSUPilot07
Member since Feb 2022
8662 posts
Posted on 1/2/24 at 10:58 pm to
Ukraine knocked out 3 MSTA-S SPGs, 3 BM-21 Grad rocket launchers, 1 BM-27 Uragan, 1 2S4 Tyulpan 240 mm self propelled mortar and a Strela-10 air defense system in Donetsk. It’s amazing that they can take losses like this regularly and just always seem to have a replacement but eventually that even has to end and I suspect they will run out of trained crews before actual artillery systems.

LINK

Ukraine has taken delivery of 26 new Czech Dana-M2 152 mm wheeled SPGs that were given to the 56th Motorized Brigade, aka the Mariupol Brigade that is currently fighting in the Donetsk area.

LINK
This post was edited on 1/2/24 at 11:57 pm
Posted by SirWinston
Say NO to War
Member since Jul 2014
104464 posts
Posted on 1/3/24 at 3:05 am to
He's fighting the extinctionists and social leftists and the NWO. Not for squeaky clean reasons, mind you. But clean enough for many free-thinking intellectuals to support Russia earning a victorious cease fire and retaining the regained portions of their land.
This post was edited on 1/3/24 at 3:08 am
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139766 posts
Posted on 1/3/24 at 4:27 am to
quote:

Wait, I thought Putin launched this was to fight Nazis in Ukraine.
Did you? Really?

Posted by Scuttle But
Member since Nov 2023
1301 posts
Posted on 1/3/24 at 4:44 am to
quote:

Ukraine knocked out 3 MSTA-S SPGs, 3 BM-21 Grad rocket launchers, 1 BM-27 Uragan, 1 2S4 Tyulpan 240 mm self propelled mortar and a Strela-10 air defense system in Donetsk. It’s amazing that they can take losses like this regularly and just always seem to have a replacement but eventually that even has to end and I suspect they will run out of trained crews before actual artillery systems.



It's amazing to me that Ukraine can inflict those types of losses and still nor gain any ground.
Posted by No Colors
Sandbar
Member since Sep 2010
13515 posts
Posted on 1/3/24 at 5:38 am to
quote:

retaining the regained portions of their land.


When was Ukraine ever part of Russia? The Tsarist Empire conquests of like 1667? Really?

So we can let all nations go back to whatever their borders were in medieval times?


Does Germany get to invade France again ? What about Mexico taking back the part of Texas that used to be theirs? Seems only right
This post was edited on 1/3/24 at 6:01 am
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
21037 posts
Posted on 1/3/24 at 6:42 am to
SirWinston, do you also support Xi, the mullahs in Tehran, and the Norks?

They are all also fighting against whatever NWO you imagine, and the LGBT movement, etc. And they are all extremely close allies of Russia.

What's the difference?
Posted by Hateradedrink
Member since May 2023
4156 posts
Posted on 1/3/24 at 6:52 am to
Your intellectual peers on the poliboard are still citing ukranian nazis.

A quick search revealed a post about how Laura Loomer ( ) is exposing nazi ukranian infiltrators in Florida
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
16134 posts
Posted on 1/3/24 at 7:03 am to
Note that the TTF (equivalent to Henry Hub in the USA) shows that natural gas prices for Europe are the lowest since June of 2021.
Posted by cypher
Member since Sep 2014
5738 posts
Posted on 1/3/24 at 7:37 am to
British Defence Intelligence
INTELLIGENCE UPDATE
UPDATE ON UKRAINE 03 January 2024

Since 29 December 2023, Russia has increased the intensity of its long-range strike operations against Ukraine. Its forces have committed a significant proportion of the stock of air launched cruise missiles and ballistic missiles they had built up over recent months.

The recent strikes likely primarily targeted Ukraine's defence industry. This contrasts with its major attacks last winter which prioritised striking Ukraine's energy infrastructure. Russia appeared set to restart this campaign by hitting energy sites in early December 2023.

These new operations suggest at least a temporary change of approach in Russia's use of long-range strikes. Russian planners almost certainly recognise the growing importance of relative defence industrial capacity as they prepare for a long war.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42753 posts
Posted on 1/3/24 at 8:01 am to
quote:

Wait, I thought Putin launched this was to fight Nazis in Ukraine.


He launched the war in 2014. Supposedly to take back which was rightfully theirs and to “rescue” Russian speaking people from harassment.

The large scale invasion was getting organized as early as March of 2021 right after Biden took office.

I don’t believe Putin was worried about NATO, he saw a weak US president so he elected to make his biggest move.
Posted by BayouBlitz
Member since Aug 2007
18126 posts
Posted on 1/3/24 at 8:58 am to
quote:

he saw a weak US president so he elected to make his biggest move.


How's that working out for him?
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42753 posts
Posted on 1/3/24 at 9:15 am to
quote:

How's that working out for him?


I think he was surprised that Biden and the West got so involved after the stunning reversal Russia suffered around Kiev.
Posted by LeClerc
USVI
Member since Oct 2012
2841 posts
Posted on 1/3/24 at 11:30 am to
quote:

Turkey has refused to allow Royal Navy minehunters donated to Ukraine to pass through its waters, blocking them from reaching the Black Sea.

The two ships were pledged to Kyiv in December to help its navy in the battle against Russia.

But on Tuesday, the office of president Recep Tayyip Erdogan said the transfer would violate the 1936 Montreux Convention which stops warships passing through its Bosphorus and Gallipoli straits during conflicts.

The straits are the only sea route to the Black Sea and Nato member Turkey insists it has implemented the ban impartially since the war in Ukraine began.

Russia has no need to use the straits to access the Ukrainian coast.

“Our pertinent allies have been duly apprised that the minehunting ships donated to Ukraine by the United Kingdom will not be allowed to pass through the Turkish Straits to the Black Sea as long as the war continues,” Turkey said in a statement posted on Twitter.

Britain is yet to comment.

The two ships were the leading parts of a new naval coalition formed with Norway to strengthen Ukraine’s capabilities in the mine-ridden Black Sea.

The Maritime Capability Coalition aimed to counter the threat of Russian sea explosives to help restore Ukraine’s grain exports and make importing supplies easier.

The Telegraph understands that the Ministry of Defence expected the ships to be banned from passing through Turkish waters when it donated them.




MSN (Telegraph)
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139766 posts
Posted on 1/3/24 at 11:37 am to
quote:

I don’t believe Putin was worried about NATO
quote:



Russia issues list of demands it says must be met to lower tensions in Europe
Contentious security guarantees Moscow is seeking include a ban on Ukraine from entering Nato

by Andrew Roth
17 Dec 2021


Russia has put forward a highly contentious list of security guarantees it says it wants the west to agree to in order to lower tensions in Europe and defuse the crisis over Ukraine, including many elements that have already been ruled out.

The demands include a ban on Ukraine entering Nato and a limit to the deployment of troops and weapons to Nato’s eastern flank, in effect returning Nato forces to where they were stationed in 1997, before an eastward expansion.

The eight-point draft treaty was released by Russia’s foreign ministry as its forces massed within striking distance of Ukraine’s borders. Moscow said ignoring its interests would lead to a “military response” similar to the Cuban missile crisis of 1962.
In summary, the eight-point draft treaty sought:

• Binding guarantees that Ukraine would never join NATO. This was the crux demand. Russia contented NATO expansion eastward threatened Russia's security.
• NATO roll back its military deployments in eastern European countries which joined after 1997, Russia contented NATO was encroaching too close to Russia's borders.
• Recognition and agreements about Russian control over the Crimean peninsula.
• That Ukraine allow a much greater level of autonomy and independence for the eastern Ukrainian regions of Donetsk and Luhansk.

---

The US and Russia discussed the Russian NATO proposal in Jan 2022. The US told Russia to pound sand.
quote:

NPR

Russia digs in on Ukraine never joining NATO, on a day of talks with the U.S.

By Bill Chappell
January 10, 2022


The idea that Ukraine, Russia's neighbor, might someday join NATO "is one of the areas where we have the greatest difference of views with the U.S.," Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said on Monday, after an hours-long discussion with his U.S. counterpart, Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman.

Sherman and Ryabkov posed together at the start of the session, convened as an effort to ease tensions aroused by Russia's positioning of some 100,000 troops along its border with Ukraine. But they both said the discussions achieved no breakthroughs — and after the talks were over, Sherman and Ryabkov each held separate briefings with the media rather than appear together.
...

"For us, it's absolutely mandatory to make sure that Ukraine never, never, ever becomes a member of NATO," Ryabkov said at a news conference after the day-long meeting in Geneva, Switzerland.

But Sherman said NATO's open-door policy is one of the alliance's key strengths, and she said the U.S. "will not allow anyone" to slam that door shut. She also said the U.S. won't allow Russia to dictate how it cooperates with other sovereign states.
...

Of the Russian side, Ryabkov said the country is "fed up" with what he called loose talk and half promises.

"We do not trust the other side," he stated. "We need ironclad, waterproof, bulletproof, legally binding guarantees — not assurances, not safeguards — guarantees with all the words" spelling out with certainty that Ukraine shall never become a member of NATO.

It was an odd set of proposals and emphases if Putin was not worried about NATO.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42753 posts
Posted on 1/3/24 at 11:47 am to
quote:

It was an odd set of proposals and emphases if Putin was not worried about NATO.


It was an odd set of proposals guaranteeing rejection by the West and giving Putin an excuse to invade.

It’s so much window dressing. Putin knew his proposal would never be accepted. He had been making concrete plans and he had been taking steps to invade deeper into Ukraine since Biden took office.
Posted by tigersmanager
Member since Jun 2010
11549 posts
Posted on 1/3/24 at 12:08 pm to
wasting our kids future on another countries war
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
21037 posts
Posted on 1/3/24 at 12:19 pm to
If anyone really cares about their kids' future, they wouldn't want them to live in a world dominated by Russia and China.
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
16134 posts
Posted on 1/3/24 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

wasting our kids future on another countries war


I cannot begin to count how many childless men (some incels) who make this claim. Not supporting Ukraine will do EXACTLY the opposite.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42753 posts
Posted on 1/3/24 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

wasting our kids future on another countries war


How so? We aren’t sending troops to fight.
This post was edited on 1/3/24 at 12:50 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3426 of 5046Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram