- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Posted on 7/8/23 at 4:51 pm to beerJeep
Posted on 7/8/23 at 4:51 pm to beerJeep
quote:
You do know Russia could make peace today if they wanted. All they have to do is return to Russia.
Without assurance Ukraine will not join NATO, that will never happen. Why should we expect Russia to be ok with MORE NATO (American) military on its border? Biden doesn't give two shits about Ukraine, this is all about fueling the MIC profits.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 4:53 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
Why should we expect Russia to be ok with MORE NATO (American) military on its border?
Because if we really wanted to, we could put them balls deep inside their border
Posted on 7/8/23 at 5:04 pm to lake chuck fan
Russia should stop doing things that make its neighbors nervous. Then they wouldn't be so eager to join NATO.
Not one of those countries has said "Nah, we're good. We don't need NATO." Why is that?
Not one of those countries has said "Nah, we're good. We don't need NATO." Why is that?
Posted on 7/8/23 at 5:11 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:
Russia should stop doing things that make its neighbors nervous. Then they wouldn't be so eager to join NATO
Finland went almost 75 years without being in NATO despite their long border with Russia. Russia fixed that pretty quickly when it got froggy.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 5:39 pm to nitwit
quote:
I realize that Sir. Winston posted on clusterbombs as “war crimes” to troll.
However, he didn’t protest when Russia initiated this practice starting in Syria, then from the earliest days of the invasion of Ukraine, using these munitions on civilians in urban areas, with a 25-30 % dud rate.
War crimes indeed.
Cluster bombs aren't considered war crimes or crimes against humanity by any authority for what they do within the combatant community of each side the only issue is the UXOs they leave behind due to the dud rate. The US has purportedly gone to great lengths to reduce the dud rate.
If someone wants to talk about war crimes within the actually battlefield and actual combatants then one needs to visit Russia on the issue of incendiary munitions.
There are always UXOs left after modern warfare doing ones best to keep that number low is the best you can do. People need to keep in mind that cluster bombs are far from the only UXOs left on the battlefield they are just ones that due to their design and function tend to leave more individual smaller munitions unexploded.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 5:43 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
Why should we expect Russia to be ok with MORE NATO (American) military on its border?
Maybe they should stop giving their neighbors reasons to gravely desire outsized defense support
Posted on 7/8/23 at 5:51 pm to DabosDynasty
I sense some long nights for the Russians in the near future
Posted on 7/8/23 at 5:52 pm to GOP_Tiger
quote:
I also wonder if the cluster bomb decision is responsible for the recent slower pace of Ukrainian attacks in the south. Ukraine has known that this decision was coming, and they may have slowed down a bit to wait for these cluster shells.
In contrast, the Bakhmut area doesn't face the same problems (mines and extensive fortifications), so Ukraine has been making more progress there.
In fact, there are reports this morning that Ukraine has captured the last key hill overlooking Klischiivka, which would mean that the capture of the town is imminent.
I would not be surprised if this is true - it looks like they initially attempted a limited breakthrough in the south and then have looked at why it failed and what they could push to obtain to mitigate those reasons while extending their offensive timeline.
Bahkmut has been interesting to watch the last few weeks. There have been claims of substantial gains in several areas over the last several days but without much visual confirmation, I think Ukraine is going a bit dark about what they are up to there either to cover operations or create a perceived threat to force Russia to commit more men.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 5:55 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
Why should we expect Russia to be ok with MORE NATO (American) military on its border?
After the Cold War old Warsaw Pact nations, Russia’s allies lined up to get into NATO, after that we have seen other European nations do the same even neutral Sweden. Now Georgia and Ukraine do too.
Do you really believe NATO is conquering these countries? You couldn’t believe that. Could it be because of Russian brutality, Russian imperialism, and Russian attacks throughout modern history against their neighbors?
Russia is lije the kid who stirred up a hornets nest and is mad because the hornets rallied together to sting him. Russia is why there’s a NATO. Russia is why NATO is expanding.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 6:01 pm to DabosDynasty
The individual bomblets could be used dropped from drones onto Soviet, oops I meant Russia, armor
Posted on 7/8/23 at 6:08 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
Without assurance Ukraine will not join NATO, that will never happen. Why should we expect Russia to be ok with MORE NATO (American) military on its border
NATO's never launched a war as an aggressor, and is an explicitly defensive alliance-- but why the blue flying frick does that matter, though?
What Russia is 'okay' with has nothing to do with what it will have to learn to live with, just as it had to learn to live with Baltic accessions to NATO.
If they don't like it, they can keep bleeding in the Ukraine, and economically imploding. Entirely their fricked up choice, just like this war. They are in it by their choice, and their choice alone.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 6:27 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
Why should we expect Russia to be ok with MORE NATO (American) military on its border? B
Guess the US should be invading Cuba any day now that China is building a base there. That's the logic here right?
Posted on 7/8/23 at 6:29 pm to StormyMcMan
quote:
Guess the US should be invading Cuba any day now that China is building a base there
Not when the CIC of the USA is in the pocket of the CCCP.
quote:
That's the logic here right?
You are way too dense for logic.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 6:30 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
You are way too dense for logic.
quote:
Errerrerrwere
Posted on 7/8/23 at 6:35 pm to cypher
Thanks for the input from you and Obtuse1.
I was going off some things I saw mentioned regarding them but after further investigation I found this was misleading. After doing some digging I have only found this mention on Wikipedia that work was budgeted in 2003 to retrofit the M42/M46 grenades used in 155mm cluster shells with a self destruct fuse. I have updated my original post with the below wiki info.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual-purpose_improved_conventional_munition
These two articles are excellent reads for the history, design and function of cluster munitions as well as some of the history on the convention on cluster munitions and U.S. policy on them. The first focuses on them from the Ukrainian war perspective and the second is about how the policy on them in the US has changed and evolved. I won't quote both as they are very long but have quoted a couple of pertinent parts from the first one.
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/what-dpicm-cluster-munitions-are-and-why-ukraine-wants-them-so-bad
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/16603/heres-what-you-need-to-know-about-the-us-militarys-new-cluster-munition-policy
This is a link to the actual convention text - lots of strong wording but also lots of loop holes that can be used to get around the commitment, though with a significantly reduced chance of UXO's in theory due to limited submunitions. I have only quoted the definition of what the convention considers a cluster munition and is explosive submunitions along with the exceptions.
https://www.clusterconvention.org/convention-text/
Edit: Clarity
quote:
2) My understanding of the cluster munitions they are receiving is that they come with a failsafe that detonates them after several days to avoid unexploded ordinance issues - how effective is this failsafe?
I was going off some things I saw mentioned regarding them but after further investigation I found this was misleading. After doing some digging I have only found this mention on Wikipedia that work was budgeted in 2003 to retrofit the M42/M46 grenades used in 155mm cluster shells with a self destruct fuse. I have updated my original post with the below wiki info.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual-purpose_improved_conventional_munition
quote:
The base bleed mechanism reduces the submunition count to 72. Work was budgeted in 2003 to retrofit the M42/M46 grenades with self-destruct fuses to reduce the problem of "dud" submunitions that do not initially explode, but may explode later upon handling. In Vietnam they were known as "firecracker rounds" owing to the rippling detonation of submunitions over a couple of seconds.
These two articles are excellent reads for the history, design and function of cluster munitions as well as some of the history on the convention on cluster munitions and U.S. policy on them. The first focuses on them from the Ukrainian war perspective and the second is about how the policy on them in the US has changed and evolved. I won't quote both as they are very long but have quoted a couple of pertinent parts from the first one.
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/what-dpicm-cluster-munitions-are-and-why-ukraine-wants-them-so-bad
quote:
"A single [DPICM] round can achieve a similar or greater operational effect as five or more rounds armed with GMLRS-U [227mm Guided Multiple Launch System artillery rockets with unitary warheads] or other high-explosive warheads," that letter also said.
quote:
In 2008, at the very tail end of President George W. Bush's tenure in office, then-Secretary of Defense Robert Gates did put a policy into place calling for the elimination of cluster munitions in U.S. inventory with failure rates above one percent. For nearly a decade after, the U.S. military was steadily moving away from cluster munitions more generally in favor of alternative options. The policy was suspended in 2017 under Preisdent Donald Trump. Congress has since blocked the production, use, or transfer of cluster munitions that do not meet the one percent standard, but the Biden administration officials are of the view this can be waived by citing vital national security interests, according to a report from The Washington Post.
quote:
It is also worth noting that the U.S. military has already publicly acknowledged the inclusion of cluster munition artillery shells loaded with scatterable anti-tank mines (which also present a threat to other kinds of vehicles) in previous aid packages for Ukraine. It is unclear why the 155mm Remote Anti-Armor Mine (RAAM) rounds did not prompt the same kind of policy debate.
quote:
The failure rates of different DPICM munition types are a matter of significant debate. One U.S. Army study in 2000 determined that up to an average of 14 percent of at least some lots of these submunitions could malfunction. Dud rates as high as 20 percent have been documented during past conflicts.
Issues in particular with the sensitivity and reliability of the fuzes in certain DPICM submunitions, as well as older ICM submunitions, especially when presented with certain environmental factors, are well established.
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/16603/heres-what-you-need-to-know-about-the-us-militarys-new-cluster-munition-policy
This is a link to the actual convention text - lots of strong wording but also lots of loop holes that can be used to get around the commitment, though with a significantly reduced chance of UXO's in theory due to limited submunitions. I have only quoted the definition of what the convention considers a cluster munition and is explosive submunitions along with the exceptions.
https://www.clusterconvention.org/convention-text/
quote:
“Cluster munition” means a conventional munition that is designed to
disperse or release explosive submunitions each weighing less than 20 kilograms, and
includes those explosive submunitions. It does not mean the following:
(a) A munition or submunition designed to dispense flares, smoke,
pyrotechnics or chaff; or a munition designed exclusively for an air
defence role;
(b) A munition or submunition designed to produce electrical or electronic
effects;
(c) A munition that, in order to avoid indiscriminate area effects and the
risks posed by unexploded submunitions, has all of the following
characteristics:
(i) Each munition contains fewer than ten explosive submunitions;
(ii) Each explosive submunition weighs more than four kilograms;
(iii) Each explosive submunition is designed to detect and engage a
single target object;
(iv) Each explosive submunition is equipped with an electronic selfdestruction mechanism;
(v) Each explosive submunition is equipped with an electronic selfdeactivating feature;
3. “Explosive submunition” means a conventional munition that in order to
perform its task is dispersed or released by a cluster munition and is designed to
function by detonating an explosive charge prior to, on or after impact;
Edit: Clarity
This post was edited on 7/8/23 at 6:40 pm
Posted on 7/8/23 at 7:58 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
Without assurance Ukraine will not join NATO, that will never happen. Why should we expect Russia to be ok with MORE NATO (American) military on its border? Biden doesn't give two shits about Ukraine, this is all about fueling the MIC profits.
Russia does not get to dictate what other sovereign nations get do.
And without joining a defensive pact what stops Russia from doing this again in 3-5 years…..
If you want peace, Russia has to withdraw and then Ukraine join the EU then NATO. NATO has been the reason we have had no wars in Europe since 1945……
Posted on 7/8/23 at 8:26 pm to tigeraddict
Isw update
quote:
Key Takeaways:
Five hundred days ago Russia launched an unprovoked war of conquest against Ukraine.
Ukrainian forces conducted counteroffensive operations on at least three sectors of the front on July 8. US Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Colin Kahl noted on July 7 that current Ukrainian operations across the front are the "beginning of the middle” of the wider counteroffensive and that it is therefore "too early to judge” how the counteroffensive is going.
The United States announced a new military aid package for Ukraine that includes cluster munitions on July 7.
Russian forces conducted another series of Shahed 131/136 drone and missile strikes against Ukraine's industrial and infrastructure facilities overnight from July 7 to 8.
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan stated that Ukraine “deserves NATO membership” ahead of the July 11 to 12 NATO summit in a press conference on July 7 in Istanbul with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Zelensky returned to Ukraine from Turkey with five Ukrainian commanders involved in the defense of Azovstal Metallurgical Combine in Mariupol, Donetsk Oblast whom Ukraine, Russia, and Turkey had previously agreed would remain in Turkey until the end of the war.
Ukrainian intelligence indicated that Russian authorities are capitalizing on the fear of a provocation at the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP) to drive out Ukrainian personnel and increase the Russian presence at the ZNPP ahead of the upcoming NATO summit.
A Wagner commander stated that the Wagner Group will go to Belarus after completing rest and recuperation through August 2023. The status of the deal between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Prigozhin is unclear, and the deal may be in flux.
The Kremlin may be attempting to ensure that it has control over Wagner leadership and personnel in Africa and the Middle East.
A prominent Russian milblogger speculated that the Russian military leadership may be in the process of making the decision to replace Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu, suggesting that the implications of the June 24 Wagner Group rebellion may still be having ramifications on the highest echelons of military command.
Russian authorities reportedly prevented former Russian officer and ardent nationalist Igor Girkin from holding a talk about the Wagner Group rebellion.
Russian forces conducted ground attacks along the Kharkiv-Luhansk Oblast border and south of Kreminna, and Ukraine likely continues to conduct strikes on Russian concentration areas deep within the rear of occupied Luhansk Oblast.
Ukrainian and Russian forces conducted ground attacks around Bakhmut.
Russian forces conducted limited ground attacks along the Avdiivka-Donetsk City line.
Russian and Ukrainian forces continued ground attacks along the administrative border between Zaporizhia and Donetsk oblasts on July 8.
Ukrainian forces continued counteroffensive operations in western Zaporizhia Oblast.
Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu reportedly observed combat training of Russian contract servicemen at the Southern Military District (SMD) training grounds on July 8, likely in an attempt to favorably portray Russian formalization efforts and incentivize personnel recruitment.
The Ukrainian government has indicated that Russian occupation authorities struggle to compensate staff in critical industries, resulting in staffing shortages that could hinder the Russian war effort.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 11:17 pm to Errerrerrwere
Already there in 2019 when Trump was president.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 11:21 pm to StormyMcMan
Posted on 7/9/23 at 1:04 am to tigeraddict
quote:At the risk of going off-topic (for the thread), that's not quite correct. To illustrate why, consider that Russia did not sign the treaty that created the International Criminal Court, which issued the warrant for Putin; but there are lots of countries that, if they could physically capture Putin, would hand him over to the ICC for prosecution. Or consider another example: do you think the charges against the Nazis that were prosecuted at Nuremberg were limited to ones based on violations of treaties to which Germany was a party at the time the violations occurred?
Can’t get a war crime if not a signatory on the treaty.
People sometimes refer to this as "international law". As a lawyer, that use of that term offends me. It's not truly law at all, it's an international agreement. The Allies' prosecution of the Nazis as Nuremberg was not a legal proceeding in the true sense. It was an exercise of power by those who had it, based on their agreement of how they'd exercise it, applying what they considered to be appropriate standards to which they'd hold those over whom the power was being exercised. Was it the right thing to do? IMO, yes.
But the whole point is, in war the victors make the rules by which they treat the vanquished--or else wars end by agreements. The suggestion that the vanquished cannot be held responsible except based on what they'd agreed to ahead of time is not true. And the suggestion that the victors can be held responsible except what they do to themselves is also no true--which is why I don't think Americans or Ukrainians should worry about the U.S. providing cluster munitions to Ukraine here.
Popular
Back to top


10




