- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/9/23 at 2:36 pm to GOP_Tiger
It’s actually more likely around double that if you say one regular 105 mm HE round costs between $300-$350. So between 90,000-100,000 rounds. It’s about time Belgium started pulling their weight.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 4:06 pm to LSUPilot07
US Congress introduced a resolution demanding to provide Ukraine with ATACMS
European Pravda — Friday, 9 June 2023, 21:26
On Friday, members of the US House Committee on Foreign Affairs representing the Democratic and Republican parties announced a resolution calling on President Joe Biden's administration to hand over ATACMS long-range missiles to Ukraine.
Source: European Pravda.
According to Republican Michael McCall, the co-author of the Resolution, and chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, if the United States does not provide Ukraine with all the necessary weapons, it will help prolong the war.
"The success of the Ukrainian counteroffensive is directly related to the military assistance provided by the United States and our allies. Therefore, it is extremely disappointing that the administration is delaying billions of dollars of military funding, which could be immediately transferred to Ukraine and in turn help its Armed Forces significantly change the situation on the battlefield," he said.
In the document, the decisions of the governments of the UK and France to transfer Storm Shadow and SCALP-EG long-range missiles, respectively, both with a range of 250 kilometres, are mentioned.
"The United States and its allies jointly own thousands of ATACMS missiles that could be transferred to Ukraine," the draft resolution said, stating that Russia's current dominance in long-range weapons "forces Ukrainian forces to fight at a much greater disadvantage".
If passed, the House of Representatives will call on the United States to "immediately transfer to Ukraine a sufficient number of ATACMS to accelerate Ukraine's victory in Russia's unprovoked aggressive war, while maintaining the combat readiness of the US military".
"The expeditious provision of this critical weapon system will provide the Ukrainian military with a critical deep-strike capability they currently lack, disrupt Russia’s warfighting ability, and could hasten Ukraine’s victory," the resolution says.
Ukrainska Pravda
European Pravda — Friday, 9 June 2023, 21:26
On Friday, members of the US House Committee on Foreign Affairs representing the Democratic and Republican parties announced a resolution calling on President Joe Biden's administration to hand over ATACMS long-range missiles to Ukraine.
Source: European Pravda.
According to Republican Michael McCall, the co-author of the Resolution, and chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, if the United States does not provide Ukraine with all the necessary weapons, it will help prolong the war.
"The success of the Ukrainian counteroffensive is directly related to the military assistance provided by the United States and our allies. Therefore, it is extremely disappointing that the administration is delaying billions of dollars of military funding, which could be immediately transferred to Ukraine and in turn help its Armed Forces significantly change the situation on the battlefield," he said.
In the document, the decisions of the governments of the UK and France to transfer Storm Shadow and SCALP-EG long-range missiles, respectively, both with a range of 250 kilometres, are mentioned.
"The United States and its allies jointly own thousands of ATACMS missiles that could be transferred to Ukraine," the draft resolution said, stating that Russia's current dominance in long-range weapons "forces Ukrainian forces to fight at a much greater disadvantage".
If passed, the House of Representatives will call on the United States to "immediately transfer to Ukraine a sufficient number of ATACMS to accelerate Ukraine's victory in Russia's unprovoked aggressive war, while maintaining the combat readiness of the US military".
"The expeditious provision of this critical weapon system will provide the Ukrainian military with a critical deep-strike capability they currently lack, disrupt Russia’s warfighting ability, and could hasten Ukraine’s victory," the resolution says.
Ukrainska Pravda
Posted on 6/9/23 at 4:50 pm to GOP_Tiger
Ukraine is definitely going for the dagger by attacking the teeth of Russian defensive lines in order to cut off Crimea.
I have to say, I’m not sure I agree with the move, but it’s their business.
I have to say, I’m not sure I agree with the move, but it’s their business.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 5:07 pm to Hateradedrink
In the Bakhmut area, Ukrainian operations north of the city appear to have stalled for the time being. Not so on the south flank.
Here's @NOELreports map showing today's Ukrainian gains around Klischiivka, south of Bakhmut.
Here's @NOELreports map showing today's Ukrainian gains around Klischiivka, south of Bakhmut.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 5:15 pm to GOP_Tiger
quote:
Russian telegram channel Veteran's notes: "Tonight will be even hotter than last. The enemy is bringing more brigades into battle than yesterday"
This comes amid reports of renewed offensive actions on the Zaporizhzhia front.
LINK
Eta
quote:
#UkraineWar: Ukrainian losses updated with:
3x Leopard 2A6 (1 destroyed, 2x abandoned)
4x M2 Bradley (abandoned)
1x VAB APC (abandoned)
1x Oshkosh M-ATV MRAP (abandoned)
More losses will be added tonight (including ~six more M2 Bradleys).
LINK
quote:
British Foreign Minister James Cleverley accused Iran of supplying ammunition to russia, –– Sky News reports.
This is London's first accusation against Tehran.
Cleverly stated that "Iran is constantly supplying russia with weapons and ammunition that are used to kill civilians in Ukraine."
In return, the Russian Federation supplies Iran with "modern military technology, financial support and advice that the regime can use to threaten our partners in the Middle East and suppress protests."
LINK
This post was edited on 6/9/23 at 5:19 pm
Posted on 6/9/23 at 5:34 pm to StormyMcMan
quote:
Russian telegram channel Veteran's notes: "Tonight will be even hotter than last. The enemy is bringing more brigades into battle than yesterday"
This comes amid reports of renewed offensive actions on the Zaporizhzhia front.
Even with the new part of the front opening now south of Hulyapole, that still only puts us up to six or maybe seven Ukrainian brigades in action so far, and there were fifteen allocated for the offensive. We haven't seen a single picture yet of a Challenger, Stryker, or CV-90 on the field. Ukraine is definitely just getting started.
I really think that Ukraine is going to continue to broaden the field. There's a rumor that one of these brigades is in the far north, near Kupiansk.
EDIT: here's Dr. Mike Martin (former British Army and now professor of War Studies at King's College, London)
quote:
I have a hunch. Tokmak could be to fix the Russian reserve (as the most obvious axis of assault) and Vuhledar the main axis.
If I were Ukraine I would want to see Russia commit its reserve.
This post was edited on 6/9/23 at 5:50 pm
Posted on 6/9/23 at 5:36 pm to GOP_Tiger
They need to go all in on the southern offensive imo
Posted on 6/9/23 at 5:53 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
They need to go all in on the southern offensive imo
Based on political or military considerations?
Posted on 6/9/23 at 6:00 pm to Athanatos
Both. Ukraine needs to get a resounding defeat of the Russian army in this offensive. Cutting off Crimea serves both political and military goals. A successful and headline grabbing victory for Ukraine will keep the money and bullets flowing from the west.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 6:21 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
They need to go all in on the southern offensive imo

Posted on 6/9/23 at 6:34 pm to Comancheria
Hope they lead with the mine-clearers.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 6:41 pm to jeffsdad
Mine clears help with clearing the mines but in a narrow path. So it acts like a funnel where you need to quickly get past or quickly destroyed as u bunch up.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 6:41 pm to Comancheria
Sometimes that poster is on sometimes way off.
Ukraine does have to guard for tactical nukes from Russia.
Ukraine does have to guard for tactical nukes from Russia.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 6:47 pm to CitizenK
quote:
Sometimes that poster is on sometimes way off.
Yeah he is hit or miss. The channels on both sides right now are very quiet. I think something big is definitely brewing tonight but I don't know if I believe 10 brigades
Posted on 6/9/23 at 6:56 pm to CitizenK
If Russia uses tactical nukes then Ukraine is the least of the Russian’s worries. That would be too much for the west to just stand by and allow, especially Poland.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 7:00 pm to GOP_Tiger
Mayhaps. It would make sense based off the “dilemma” tactics.
Make them have to reinforce to protect Tomak and then the field is set.
Russia has to know that’s the plan and is trying to avoid reinforcing.
Make them have to reinforce to protect Tomak and then the field is set.
Russia has to know that’s the plan and is trying to avoid reinforcing.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 7:19 pm to LSUPilot07
I can't really see them using one in Ukraine. Unless a large force crosse the border and headed for the capital, I think they would refrain. They know if they use one it's go time. They might as well light them all off
Popular
Back to top


0




