- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Karen Read murder trial - Not guilty on main - guilty of OUI(DUI) only
Posted on 5/21/25 at 10:20 am to OweO
Posted on 5/21/25 at 10:20 am to OweO
They have this neuroscience expert on the stand. No one is debating whether or not he had a head injury. He’s describing a traumatic brain injury. They don’t need the pathophysiology lesson of a subarachnoid hemorrhage/ subdural. I think this will be a problem for the CW on cross.
2
Posted on 5/21/25 at 10:33 am to 10tiger
all 18 jurors are still present.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 10:52 am to 10tiger
I think the purpose of this doctor to show that John didn’t die immediately after he received the head injury. The CW is trying to show Karen could have saved his life if she did hit him with her car to go more towards she intended for him to die.
Hank Brennan is dumb if he actually believes Karen did this.
Hank Brennan is dumb if he actually believes Karen did this.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 11:23 am to civiltiger07
quote:
The CW is trying to show Karen could have saved his life if she did hit him with her car to go more towards she intended for him to die.
Am I correct to assume that the 2nd degree murder charge kind of hinges on this?
Posted on 5/21/25 at 12:18 pm to civiltiger07
quote:
John didn’t die immediately after he received the head injury.
Hos long to die in cold
Posted on 5/21/25 at 12:27 pm to lostinbr
quote:
Am I correct to assume that the 2nd degree murder charge kind of hinges on this?
From my understanding 2nd degree is intent to kill someone. They have to show that she knowingly and purposely reversed the Lexus intending to hit and kill John. So it would be possible she did reverse the vehicle but not intend to kill John.
This post was edited on 5/21/25 at 12:28 pm
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:08 pm to civiltiger07
quote:
They have to show that she knowingly and purposely reversed the Lexus intending to hit and kill John.
meanwhile, Jen McCabe had looked out the window twice in 15 minutes and heard nothing and saw nothing. Heard no engine revving or tires skidding in the snow and did not hear a car hitting a human body or a person yell having been smashed by a car. Also did not notice a body lying in the light snow when she looked out the second time in 15 minutes and the car was gone.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:40 pm to civiltiger07
Who is this witness? She is kind of cute.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 2:00 pm to OweO
Was thinking the same. Take her hair down and drop the nerdy glasses and she'd be like Laney Boggs 
Posted on 5/21/25 at 2:05 pm to idlewatcher
It looks like the state has rested their case in chief!
The judge just ended court for today and no court tomorrow.
The judge just ended court for today and no court tomorrow.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 2:07 pm to civiltiger07
Maybe I misunderstood the ending b/c the audio still blows, but didn't she say it would be a half day tomorrow?
Posted on 5/21/25 at 2:07 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
didn't she say it would be a half day tomorrow?
They were supposed to have a half day tomorrow but she gave them the day off.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 2:14 pm to civiltiger07
Well they get a nice little break.
How long do yall think is left in this trial?
How long do yall think is left in this trial?
Posted on 5/21/25 at 2:21 pm to OweO
quote:
How long do yall think is left in this trial?
The defense has said they expect their case to take a week and a half. So if the state is indeed resting their case, lets say the defense will take 2 weeks then the state will probably have a rebuttal case. Lets say a week for the rebuttal case and this case may be in the jury's hands by the middle of June.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 2:43 pm to civiltiger07
Well, Well, Well
Shanon Burgess' profile on Apertures website no longer list a degree from UAB and his CV and LinkedIn links are no longer on his profile either.
Aperture Website
Shanon Burgess' profile on Apertures website no longer list a degree from UAB and his CV and LinkedIn links are no longer on his profile either.
Aperture Website
Posted on 5/21/25 at 2:55 pm to civiltiger07
How pathetic. Hope AJ brings that up in closing. On another note, what is the board's take on the pieces/shards of glass found at the scene that don't match. Did glass just magically appear because the glass from the scene did not match the (alleged) piece of glass from the bumper.
LINK
Posted on 5/21/25 at 3:27 pm to idlewatcher
Was that not from the cocktail glass that he allegedly had in his hand ? I can’t keep up with all the random evidence that they pick and choose what to acknowledge.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 3:39 pm to winkchance
quote:
meanwhile, Jen McCabe had looked out the window twice in 15 minutes and heard nothing and saw nothing. Heard no engine revving or tires skidding in the snow and did not hear a car hitting a human body or a person yell having been smashed by a car. Also did not notice a body lying in the light snow when she looked out the second time in 15 minutes and the car was gone.
She stated that she looked out at least 3 times, likely more.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 4:47 pm to civiltiger07
quote:
It looks like the state has rested their case in chief!
Don’t they still have to call the witness back from yesterday?
Posted on 5/21/25 at 5:27 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
Don’t they still have to call the witness back from yesterday?
She finished her testimony today.
Page 87 of 159
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News