- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Karen Read murder trial - Not guilty on main - guilty of OUI(DUI) only
Posted on 6/12/25 at 9:40 am to LSBoosie
Posted on 6/12/25 at 9:40 am to LSBoosie
quote:
I mean we know from the last trial that the jury was apparently all in agreement on some charges but split on others.
We've watched a good chunk of the trial and there's more than enough evidence for reasonable doubt based on the evidence but I think this one is more of a setup. I think the jury finds her guilty of a lesser charge.
I think she's not guilty.
1
Posted on 6/12/25 at 9:43 am to LSUBALLER
Not Guilty. FKR.
Lock up Auntie Beverage and Hank and throw away the keys.
Lock up Auntie Beverage and Hank and throw away the keys.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 9:45 am to BeepBopBoop
quote:
We've watched a good chunk of the trial and there's more than enough evidence for reasonable doubt based on the evidence
Agreed, but I also said the same thing last trial. I honestly have no idea what I think the verdict will be other than the fact that I think there is a 0% chance she is found guilty of murder.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 9:47 am to civiltiger07
quote:So the jury doesn't have to hear Hank's voice?
Why in the world is Lally doing this argument?
Posted on 6/12/25 at 9:50 am to LSBoosie
There is always a 5% to 10% chance of catching a guilty verdict just by virtue of being in the defendant's chair.
But yea -- there is no way they can find guilty on murder. There is no support for that.
Frankly, the CW did not prove that OJO was even hit by the Lexus so it should be an easy clean sweep NG on all counts in a sane, just world.
Sadly, this court and county are corrupt as shite, so it won't be that easy.
But yea -- there is no way they can find guilty on murder. There is no support for that.
Frankly, the CW did not prove that OJO was even hit by the Lexus so it should be an easy clean sweep NG on all counts in a sane, just world.
Sadly, this court and county are corrupt as shite, so it won't be that easy.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 9:57 am to jclem11
quote:This is where I am.
Frankly, the CW did not prove that OJO was even hit by the Lexus
Posted on 6/12/25 at 9:58 am to AlxTgr
quote:
quote:
Frankly, the CW did not prove that OJO was even hit by the Lexus
This is where I am.
I think there's proof that he was not hit.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 10:01 am to Gris Gris
quote:
I think there's proof that he was not hit.
absolutely this
Posted on 6/12/25 at 10:08 am to Gris Gris
quote:
I think there's proof that he was not hit.
Agree completely. My comments are just from the point of view that the defense doesn't have to prove OJO was NOT hit but rather that the CW did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that OJO WAS hit by the Lexus.
If OJO is not hit by the Lexus then we are done and the CW theory and house of cards come crashing down.
All the other commentary about shady investigation and Proctor being shady and Jen lying are irrelevant if OJO is never hit by the Lexus.
This post was edited on 6/12/25 at 10:21 am
Posted on 6/12/25 at 10:41 am to jclem11
the defense is still worried about the formatting of the jury slip, and the judge doesn't seem willing to make any changes to the jury slip at all.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 10:44 am to civiltiger07
The state wants to argue the fact that Karen moved her Lexus from John's house to her parents house as a consciousness of guilt. Of course the judge replies, "I'm going to allow that".
Posted on 6/12/25 at 10:45 am to MBclass83
quote:
Guilty of manslaughter. She should be punished for driving that drunk.
At least state your case. Why do you think this?
Posted on 6/12/25 at 10:49 am to MBclass83
quote:This may be one of the dumbest things I have read on this site and that's saying a lot.
Guilty of manslaughter. She should be punished for driving that drunk.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 10:53 am to OweO
I don't have to state my case. The question was what are you all thinking and I answered that.
I read all the time on TD that women are crazy. Why is this situation so hard to believe? There really seems no other reasonable explanation.
She will not be found guilty but that's what I think.
I read all the time on TD that women are crazy. Why is this situation so hard to believe? There really seems no other reasonable explanation.
She will not be found guilty but that's what I think.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 10:55 am to MBclass83
quote:
I read all the time on TD that women are crazy. Why is this situation so hard to believe? There really seems no other reasonable explanation.
what a strange fricking statement
Are you not able to keep a girlfriend or something?
Posted on 6/12/25 at 10:56 am to MBclass83
Surely this is a troll. Yes. All women are crazy and every time someone drives drunk they mow someone down in reverse throwing a body 20 feet and sustaining dog bites to their arms. How silly of us to even have a trial.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 11:04 am to MBclass83
quote:Because you have never said what convinced you that the vehicle made contact with the body. You just seem to want to find her guilty because she's crazy and was drunk. That's like 70 IQ shite right there.
I read all the time on TD that women are crazy. Why is this situation so hard to believe? There really seems no other reasonable explanation.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 11:23 am to AlxTgr
I believe Brennan is covering his own arse. It’s my opinion he canceled the rebuttal case because calling welcher and Hartnett to the stand could get into misconduct on his part.
Welcher may have testified that Brennan didn’t give him X-rays or OJO right arm.
Hartnett may have testified that they discussed her taking the clippings from the hoodie in testimony prep meetings.
Then today Lally handles all of the argument for charges and Brennan is just sitting silent at the table.
Welcher may have testified that Brennan didn’t give him X-rays or OJO right arm.
Hartnett may have testified that they discussed her taking the clippings from the hoodie in testimony prep meetings.
Then today Lally handles all of the argument for charges and Brennan is just sitting silent at the table.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 11:25 am to civiltiger07
quote:Hmmm
Hartnett may have testified that they discussed her taking the clippings from the hoodie in testimony prep meetings.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 1:05 pm to civiltiger07
quote:
She should be punished for driving that drunk.
Did they do a blood test to prove this?
Page 115 of 159
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News