- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Karen Read murder trial - Not guilty on main - guilty of OUI(DUI) only
Posted on 6/12/25 at 1:10 pm to winkchance
Posted on 6/12/25 at 1:10 pm to winkchance
No way KR is found guilty. There is so much doubt. The CW did not prove without a reasonable doubt that she hit and killed him. JOK was hit but not with a car and certainly not with KR's Lexus.
0
Posted on 6/12/25 at 1:10 pm to MBclass83
quote:
Guilty of manslaughter. She should be punished for driving that drunk.
You think they proved she hit him with the Lexus?
Otherwise, you're saying she should be convicted of manslaughter because she drove drunk.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 1:30 pm to winkchance
They took her blood for a psyc hold or something to that effect, then much later tested for alcohol.
Not to mention, she could have drank after arriving home that night.
So many problems with the way they went about this.
Not to mention, she could have drank after arriving home that night.
So many problems with the way they went about this.
This post was edited on 6/12/25 at 1:57 pm
Posted on 6/12/25 at 1:32 pm to winkchance
quote:
Did they do a blood test to prove this?
The blood test they did is not the test that is done when you are arrested for DUI. Also, the sample was taken around 8 or 9 am the morning after and the results were an "estimate".
Posted on 6/12/25 at 2:05 pm to OweO
quote:Yep. This is entertainment for us, but to KR it's fighting for freedom vs life in prison.
I'd be a wreck through the whole trial because everyone on any jury can see things in their own way. You have no idea who is thinking what and what juror is influencing other jury members, etc, etc.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 2:12 pm to jchamil
quote:I think the inference was as punishment for driving drunk. Not that he thinks she hit him.
Otherwise, you're saying she should be convicted of manslaughter because she drove drunk
Posted on 6/12/25 at 2:49 pm to Tigers4Lyfe
quote:He said, Guilty of manslaughter. That requires thinking she hit him.
I think the inference was as punishment for driving drunk. Not that he thinks she hit him.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 2:49 pm to MBclass83
quote:
She will not be found guilty but that's what I think
Nobody gives a shite
Posted on 6/12/25 at 3:31 pm to Rebel
quote:That's how you know it's an AI. It didn't spend 3 paragraphs describing the sandwich, and another 4 telling how it would make a better one.
askin’ if he got cozy wit’ de defense team, like eatin’ a ham sandwich at lunch durin’ de first trial. Rentschler, he just shrugged an’ said he stood in de corner, munchin’ his sandwich, nothin’ more.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 3:34 pm to jclem11
Posted on 6/12/25 at 3:55 pm to AlxTgr
quote:I'll say it again, following that up with "should be punished for drunk driving" is an inference that he doesn't really think she's guilty but that it is a just punishment "for drunk driving".
He said, Guilty of manslaughter. That requires thinking she hit him.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 4:03 pm to Tigers4Lyfe
Lest we forget gents….
hos long to die in cold
But yea, according to MBunderclass, there was clear and distinct video of KR running him over then again for good measure
hos long to die in cold
But yea, according to MBunderclass, there was clear and distinct video of KR running him over then again for good measure
Posted on 6/12/25 at 4:05 pm to Tigers4Lyfe
quote:
I'll say it again, following that up with "should be punished for drunk driving" is an inference that he doesn't really think she's guilty but that it is a just punishment "for drunk driving".
So you think he is saying that her punishment for drunk driving is that she should be found guilty of manslaughter?
Posted on 6/12/25 at 4:15 pm to Tigers4Lyfe
quote:I'll say it again, his exact post was,
I'll say it again, following that up with "should be punished for drunk driving" is an inference that he doesn't really think she's guilty but that it is a just punishment "for drunk driving".
quote:
Guilty of manslaughter. She should be punished for driving that drunk.
Your reading of this makes zero sense.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 7:06 pm to MBclass83
quote:
I don't have to state my case. The question was what are you all thinking and I answered that.
I read all the time on TD that women are crazy. Why is this situation so hard to believe? There really seems no other reasonable explanation.
This might be the dumbest thing I have ever read on here and that says a lot... but what's bad is that I actually think you are serious (opposed to trolling).
Maybe I am so far on the side that she didn't do it that I am blinded by a few things... But when you piece it all together I there are too many unanswered questions.
Has it been proven O'keefe went into the Alberts house? KR gave her side of this. She dropped him off, he went inside the Alberts, she left the Alberts a little while after calling and texting him multiple times in which he didn't respond. If he was in the Alberts house then he would have been inside when she left. Has her story been disproven? If you can't tell me for sure that he absolutely wasn't in the house and was outside when she left then how can you say she hit him?
Then they can't even prove his injuries were caused by a vehicle. In fact, experts are saying it looks like dog bites.
So if she hit him how can you explain the injuries on his body?
Posted on 6/13/25 at 6:17 am to OweO
What kind of pretzels will Brennan tie himself into during closing arguments today?
How many times will he misrepresent facts of the case?
Will he make an Ouch objection during Jackson's closing?
How many times will he misrepresent facts of the case?
Will he make an Ouch objection during Jackson's closing?
Posted on 6/13/25 at 8:00 am to civiltiger07
Bev already denied defense motion for "transparency regarding alternate juror selection".
Transparency bad according to Auntie Beverage.
Why is transparency bad, Bev?
Are you hiding something? More shady dealings going on, Bev?
Transparency bad according to Auntie Beverage.
Why is transparency bad, Bev?
Are you hiding something? More shady dealings going on, Bev?
Posted on 6/13/25 at 8:01 am to jclem11
quote:
Bev already denied defense motion for "transparency regarding alternate juror selection".
She does things how she does things.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 8:04 am to civiltiger07
AJ doing the close for defense. Not surprising imo. Expect "lots of visuals" is what I am hearing.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 8:17 am to jclem11
Why would they have such a small courtroom for such a public trial? Weird choice.
Page 116 of 159
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News