Started By
Message

re: Israel–Hamas War Discussion Thread: News Links On First Page

Posted on 10/10/23 at 10:57 pm to
Posted by ZIGG
Member since Dec 2016
12044 posts
Posted on 10/10/23 at 10:57 pm to
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34717 posts
Posted on 10/10/23 at 11:00 pm to
quote:

Hamas is the elected power in Gaza.


I'm not sure how legitimate their elections are. I'm sure they'd make Putin blush.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103940 posts
Posted on 10/10/23 at 11:01 pm to
Hard to tell who did what in Gaza but Hamas has operated with impunity for years, been elected by these people, and allowed them to operate from their buildings, blaming the Jews for any casualties caused by Hamas violating Geneva.


Do I want all Palestinians dead? No. But I certainly understand Israel’s perspective and their insistence that nothing like this happen again.


It’s like people who live in the hood… if you are too afraid to turn people over to the cops or to move out, my amount of sympathy for being caught in the crossfire when someone comes for the local gang is low.
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
143790 posts
Posted on 10/10/23 at 11:01 pm to
The Gaza residents elected Hamas. Maybe not all of them. But a plurality of them.

Hamas doesn't represent all of Palestine. But represents the citizens of Gaza. After the events of this week, Hamas can no longer be allowed to exist in proximity to Israel.



Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63303 posts
Posted on 10/10/23 at 11:05 pm to
quote:

Currently there is a disconnect in this thread between the understanding that civilians will die and the thirst for wiping out all Palestinians.
-------
Palestinians outside of Gaza should face no harm
I'd love it if innocent Palestinians INSIDE Gaza escaped harm. But it was Hamas' actions that put them in jeopardy. When those innocent people (tragically) are harmed, we need to remember who caused it. Blaming Israel for defending itself is intellectually lazy at best. Dishonest at worst.
Posted by Burt Orangello
DFW
Member since Sep 2023
638 posts
Posted on 10/10/23 at 11:07 pm to
quote:

Burt, honestly I think you are a very bright person. But if we let you lead in America in 1941 the world would be United under the Nazi flag currently.

For every “great evil country” in history, a shite load if not the majority of the actual people of that country weren’t actually bad. They were just foot soldiers for the evil regime. That’s kinda how it goes.


How you draw that conclusion from anything I've argued is beyond me, but okay.

You do realize that some people can make judgments on different situations with different facts, circumstances, and variables, treating each one as unique and requiring a different answer...right?

It's pretty obvious many in this discussion can't, but believe it or not, there are some people out there who can.
Posted by Hawgnsincebirth55
Gods country
Member since Sep 2016
18515 posts
Posted on 10/10/23 at 11:09 pm to
quote:

You lay with dogs you're gonna get fleas.
I’m just saying, I wouldn’t want people judging all Americans off of the queer freaks you see on social media so I’ll try not to judge all Palestinians off. Now I know it’s a whole fricking lot of them that support Hamas and I’m down for the Israelis fricking them up because I believe they deserve it, and I know that there’s gonna be some innocent collaterals in the process, that’s just part of war, but I’m not for Genociding every man woman and child of Palestine. Then you’re no better than they are.
Posted by Duke
Dillon, CO
Member since Jan 2008
36494 posts
Posted on 10/10/23 at 11:09 pm to
quote:

I'd love it if innocent Palestinians INSIDE Gaza escaped harm. But it was Hamas' actions that put them in jeopardy. When those innocent people (tragically) are harmed, we need to remember who caused it. Blaming Israel for defending itself is intellectually lazy at best. Dishonest at worst.


I have in the past called for Israel to keep it proportional to the offense. I do here too, but proportional to this offense is... drastic.

Im with you, sad for the innocents and rightly blaming Hamas for whats to come.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111336 posts
Posted on 10/10/23 at 11:09 pm to
Every country that has been the “big bad” in the War had tons of innocent great people. Many more than Gaza. Stating that Gaza or anyone else “isn’t all bad” isn’t much of a revelation. Or it shouldn’t be to anyone.

It just doesn’t matter in War and it never has. If you try and make it matter, you will never win said war

War is awful. The definition is humans murdering other humans. It’s horrific. Good people will die. I mean I’m not trying to be a smart arse but it can’t be stated any better. Hamas needed to get blown off the planet. To do so Gaza needs to be leveled. To do that means anyone in Gaza is in the crosshairs
This post was edited on 10/10/23 at 11:12 pm
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
19829 posts
Posted on 10/10/23 at 11:11 pm to
quote:

I'm not sure how legitimate their elections are. I'm sure they'd make Putin blush.
let's put it this way, in 2017 Abbas put sanctions on the Gaza Strip as head of the Palestinian Authority.

Yes, the head of the Palestinian Authority put sanctions on the Gaza Strip.... not just Hamas, the whole Gaza Strip.

So the head of the PA did not choose, politically, to separate the GS from Hamas and treated them one in the same.

ETA: and Israel chose to honor Abbas' sanctions in partnership with the PA creating the myth that Israel is the sole cause of their economic hardships.
This post was edited on 10/10/23 at 11:15 pm
Posted by Burt Orangello
DFW
Member since Sep 2023
638 posts
Posted on 10/10/23 at 11:11 pm to
quote:

Nobody is calling for pacifism here. Hamas should be eliminated. That doesn't mean killing all Palestinians, though.



Sir, in this thread there are only two opposing extremes. There is room for judgment. If you don't think all Palestinians are guilty and need killing, then you support the beheading of babies. You have to choose one or the other. It's that simple.
Posted by Hawgnsincebirth55
Gods country
Member since Sep 2016
18515 posts
Posted on 10/10/23 at 11:12 pm to
quote:

I'd love it if innocent Palestinians INSIDE Gaza escaped harm. But it was Hamas' actions that put them in jeopardy. When those innocent people (tragically) are harmed, we need to remember who caused it. Blaming Israel for defending itself is intellectually lazy at best. Dishonest at worst.
who’s blaming israel? Israel has every right to go in and frick then up. But people saying shite like, “ i wouldn’t be against killing all the future terrorist too” is going off the deep end. Your talking about full on baby murder at that point
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
143790 posts
Posted on 10/10/23 at 11:13 pm to
quote:

I do here too, but proportional to this offense is... drastic.



I don't see it so much in terms of proportionality. My view is that it can never be allowed to happen again. Hamas doesn't get a "do-over" this time.

Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111336 posts
Posted on 10/10/23 at 11:13 pm to
quote:

who’s blaming israel? Israel has every right to go in and frick then up. But people saying shite like, “ i wouldn’t be against killing all the future terrorist too” is going off the deep end. You’re talking about full on baby murder at that point
Its basically what we did to Japan. Take away their absolute will in order to save some of our soldiers in the future

What’s the goal as a leader? To protect as many innocent people on the enemies side, or to protect your own troops? It’s an answer that’s not simple

Imagine someone gives you the choice, murder 5,000 innocent enemy women and children to save 50k of your own soldiers. What is the “right” choice as an elected leader who is sworn to protect the people that elected him?
This post was edited on 10/10/23 at 11:17 pm
Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
24238 posts
Posted on 10/10/23 at 11:17 pm to
quote:

Holy frick look at this destruction to Gaza already and Israel has barely started.

Yep, this is all just targeted air strikes. They haven't even began to approach an all out bombardment.

I have a feeling that if Hezbollah or some other entity or state decides to open another front that Israel will show what true "air superiority" looks like and start to unleash everything they have.
Posted by Duke
Dillon, CO
Member since Jan 2008
36494 posts
Posted on 10/10/23 at 11:18 pm to
quote:

I don't see it so much in terms of proportionality


I was saying proportionality is

quote:

is that it can never be allowed to happen again
This post was edited on 10/10/23 at 11:19 pm
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
19829 posts
Posted on 10/10/23 at 11:23 pm to
quote:

Yep, this is all just targeted air strikes. They haven't even began to approach an all out bombardment.

I have a feeling that if Hezbollah or some other entity or state decides to open another front that Israel will show what true "air superiority" looks like and start to unleash everything they have.
there's a reason they are probably limiting sorties right now... if Hisbollah moves they will quickly exhaust their pilots and machines.

They're saving themselves for the really hot chick in the Jordan Valley who pose a serious military threat. You can bet your arse observers are doing their best to identify tail markings and are counting the number of sorties over which intervals. And Israel, as they have done in the past, are changing those tail markings, RTB'g to different aerodromes so that out=/=in to confuse those observers.
Posted by ABearsFanNMS
Formerly of tLandmass now in Texas
Member since Oct 2014
20197 posts
Posted on 10/10/23 at 11:23 pm to
quote:

I still see buildings standing. Israel needs to change that.


Destroyed buildings/rubble are easier to defend….read up in the siege of Stalingrad or the battle for Hue City.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63303 posts
Posted on 10/10/23 at 11:25 pm to
quote:

But people saying shite like, “ i wouldn’t be against killing all the future terrorist too” is going off the deep end. Your talking about full on baby murder at that point
LegendInMyMind said it better than I could, and I quoted it for a reason.
quote:

Currently there is a disconnect in this thread between the understanding that civilians will die and the thirst for wiping out all Palestinians.
Posted by Hawgnsincebirth55
Gods country
Member since Sep 2016
18515 posts
Posted on 10/10/23 at 11:40 pm to
quote:

Its basically what we did to Japan. Take away their absolute will in order to save some of our soldiers in the future What’s the goal as a leader? To protect as many innocent people on the enemies side, or to protect your own troops? It’s an answer that’s not simple Imagine someone gives you the choice, murder 5,000 innocent enemy women and children to save 50k of your own soldiers. What is the “right” choice as an elected leader who is sworn to protect the people that elected him?
yeah we nuked Japan. We didn’t erase the Japanese from the planet. We didn’t kill all the “ future banzai chargers.” So again, I’m all for fricking up Hamas, which means killing some innocents that’s just how war works, but there’s a difference between breaking their will and genociding them. I’m also okay with Israel taking over all of Gaza I just don’t think they should exterminate all Palestinians while they do it.
This post was edited on 10/10/23 at 11:41 pm
Jump to page
Page First 107 108 109 110 111 ... 388
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 109 of 388Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram