Started By
Message

re: Israel Pfizer efficacy against covid-19 hospitalizations broken down by age group

Posted on 8/18/21 at 11:20 am to
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
36509 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 11:20 am to
quote:

If you want to do that and multiple the covid risk of myocarditis by 60%, it is STILL HIGHER THAN THAT OF THE VACCINE


I don't disagree, but 40% is a material amount to say doesn't matter

quote:

And that isnt taking into account future infections are still being added


Neither does the vaccine rate take into account future boosters
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108205 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 11:20 am to
quote:

My point was that one lead to the other. If they don’t mislead us originally then the mistrust isn’t nearly as high.


What do you think my point was?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108205 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 11:21 am to
quote:


Neither does the vaccine rate take into account future boosters
Why would that change the rate?
Posted by Lestradamus
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2015
347 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 11:22 am to
quote:

Well you might want to add the covid risk for this as well

.09%

So the vaccine actually helps to reduce this as well


You referring to Singer’s study? Are 12-17 y/o young adults? Do you have anything for myocarditis in young adults?

Also, it seems like they viewed myocarditis as far as 90 days out. Seems like a pretty long time, but I don’t know how long it would take before you can rule out Covid or a vax causing myocarditis
This post was edited on 8/18/21 at 11:25 am
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
23043 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 11:23 am to
quote:

What do you think my point was?


That both sides are being equally irrational. Will there be anti vaccine people regardless sure but that number was amped up exponentially by the medical/govt community’s actions pre-vaccine.

The seemed to get everything wrong with Covid pre-vaccine. And feed us line after line of BS and then all of a sudden we were supposed to trust the science of the vaccine.
This post was edited on 8/18/21 at 11:26 am
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
36509 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 11:24 am to
quote:

Why would that change the rate?



If I smoke one cigarette I'm not going to get lung cancer. If I smoke a pack of cigarettes a day for 20 years, I dramaticly increase that chance.

Is that absolutely going to happen with this vaccine? I don't know, and probably not, but now we're back to that uncertainty.

And even if the chance stays the same relatively, if you subject yourself to that chance twice annually you are increasing the absolute chance
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108205 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 11:24 am to
quote:

Will there be anti vaccine people regardless sure but that number was amped up exponentially by the medical/govt community actions pre-vaccine.

Look man, I dont see how you cant tell that was my exact point when I said this:

quote:

Bottom line is the group pushing the vaccine has done a terrible job of false messaging on the risk of the virus, which undermines their trust factor
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
20660 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 11:26 am to
Yea, but if you already had the infection then go get the shot; your chances go all the way up to .0913%
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
23043 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 11:28 am to
I don’t want to argue. I’m just saying your tone was both sides are to blame equally. I’m saying one side is way more to blame. I would bet many extremely pro-vaccine people are hesitant bc of the BS they’ve been told the last year and a half. And those same people are even more hesitant when the same BS artists are now doubling down by mandating the vaccine bc people are NOT taking it.

This post was edited on 8/18/21 at 11:29 am
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
57839 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 11:30 am to
quote:




So 1% out of 100,000 people who are not vaxxed will have a severe case IF they get infected.

And to avoid that everyone must be injected with an experimental drug which has not been in existence for even two years yet.

Posted by deathvalleytiger10
Member since Sep 2009
9025 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 11:31 am to
quote:

you have no data or medical basis to lean on


100% false. The data is out there and being presented around the world, at least where it is not censored. Of course that doesn't concern you at all does it. Only a fool believes they know everything. And right now, no one knows the long term effects of these vaccines. NO ONE.

I have had covid, did well with it, and still have antibodies. I don't need the vaccine. Here is your data on that.. LINK
And, those that had covid are much more likely to suffer more severe adverse effect from the vaccines. Here is your data again, Dr. Pride... LINK

The vaccine should be administered to our most vulnerable and those with comorbidities.

It absolutely should not be given to children and those who are young and healthy.





Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108205 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 11:31 am to
quote:

I’m just saying your tone was both sides are to blame equally.
And they are as a whole

People who stay quiet but not want the vaccine because of mistrust are simply not wanting it are completey not to blame, same with the pro vaccine proponents who have never falsified the actual virus risk. Neither of those groups of people are to blame at all IMHO

But the pro vaccine crowd who lies and continues to lie, and the anti-vax crowd that posts bullshite over and over are equally blamed
Posted by Tiger985
Member since Nov 2006
7448 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 11:33 am to
The chart tells me we have some real good vaccine candidates out there.

It also tells me mass vaccination is absurd.

People have a right to make their own choice with this vaccine.

It's a real stretch to even claim it's a debatable point.

And for kids? Give me a break.

Thank you for making the case for medical freedom.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108205 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 11:33 am to
quote:

100% false. The data is out there and being presented around the world, at least where it is not censored. Of course that doesn't concern you at all does it. Only a fool believes they know everything. And right now, no one knows the long term effects of these vaccines. NO ONE.
You had covid? What if 7 years down the road your head explodes because of having covid? PROVE THAT WONT HAPPEN
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
23043 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 11:34 am to
quote:


But the pro vaccine crowd who lies and continues to lie, and the anti-vax crowd that posts bullshite over and over are equally blamed



Ok. I’m just saying the current vocal anti-vax crowd grew exponentially bc of what happened in the early stages of Covid.

There are not these kind of hesitancy issues with the MMR vaccine. True anti-vac crowd is against that one too. People are fed up with the BS they have been served and a pushing back extra hard bc of it.
This post was edited on 8/18/21 at 11:37 am
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108205 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 11:35 am to
quote:

Thank you for making the case for medical freedom.

I beleive in medical freedom, I just also beleive in logic

If your Doctor tells you to take tylenol for fever, you do it. 99.99999% chance the fever wont kill or hurt you, but you still do it.


Now, we say frick that bullshite.


Yeh yeh yeh, "LONG TERM EFFECTS"

Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112623 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 11:36 am to
quote:

Well you might want to add the covid risk for this as well

.09%

So the vaccine actually helps to reduce this as well

quote:

And regardless, I think its impossible to not be exposed to the viral particles of covid at this point

Those arguing against you have said the same exact thing since this whole thing started


This post was edited on 8/18/21 at 11:38 am
Posted by Tiger985
Member since Nov 2006
7448 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 11:41 am to
quote:

If your Doctor tells you to take tylenol for fever, you do it. 99.99999% chance the fever wont kill or hurt you, but you still do it.


Fever is a weapon against illness.

Most fevers should not be treated.

You are again making the medical freedom case.

I take it when I want it.

Keep going!
Posted by deathvalleytiger10
Member since Sep 2009
9025 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 11:42 am to
quote:

You had covid? What if 7 years down the road your head explodes because of having covid? PROVE THAT WONT HAPPEN



What an intelligent statement.

Would your pride and joy vaccine have prevented me from getting it?
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85368 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 11:42 am to
quote:

You are again making the medical freedom case.


when has pride argued against the medical freedom case?
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram