Started By
Message

re: Is the OT with the dock workers or against?

Posted on 10/2/24 at 6:35 am to
Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
21646 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 6:35 am to
quote:

they want a written guarantee that port owners won't automate anything like most foreign ports have done or are doing

Didn't they fix this in like 2001 in season 2 "The Wire"?
This post was edited on 10/2/24 at 6:36 am
Posted by cubsfinger
On The Road
Member since Mar 2017
1753 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 6:37 am to
I also work in the automation field and while we do take the manual labor positions, more plants than not will find a spot for the guy whose job is being replaced.
Posted by stelly1025
Lafayette
Member since May 2012
9481 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 6:45 am to
I can understand wanting to bargain for higher wages ,but 77% and cut out any and all automation? Yeah, that is absolutely crazy and completely unreasonable.
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
148031 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 6:47 am to
quote:

Do they not realize that what they're doing now is how we get robots?



Do they not realize they are stepping on their own dicks?
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
55411 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 6:47 am to
quote:

What are they asking for? I’ve heard they’re wanting something like a 75% pay raise. Is that true?


77% raise parsed out over the next 6 years (nothing like knowing you're getting a guaranteed 12.8% raise each year, eh?) and an agreement that there will be no further automation in their jobs.

The higher labor costs go, the more cost-effective automation becomes. With this deal, they are wanting to not only frick consumers (because consumers ultimately pay these extra costs), but they want a guarantee they can continue fricking us far into the future.
Posted by kciDAtaE
Member since Apr 2017
16650 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 6:52 am to
Yeah. frick these people. I’ve never really cared or thought about the dock workers. They were just another unskilled, manual labor profession.

Now that I’ve been force to think about them, they suck and should be replaced with robots as soon as possible
Posted by OU812ME2
Earth
Member since Jun 2021
1160 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 7:07 am to
They aren't dock workers. They're dock strikers. Don't like your job, then get another one that's better. Never understood a union in a free country.
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
148031 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 7:08 am to
These people should be lucky to even have a job in the first place







Posted by CDUBTX
TX
Member since Mar 2022
260 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 7:11 am to
I’m all for employees negotiating better terms for themselves but not for everyone. These unions hold the rest of us hostage. If you excel at your job, then you should make more or be able to leave for the competition. This shite has to stop. I’m sure these guys work hard but they want $69 an hour and no automation. There are very few industries insulated from technological advancement. We’re all at risk to some extent. F these unions.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
39108 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 7:27 am to
The irony here is the only reason they have jobs is because the greedy corporations sent all our manufacturing overseas and now we need to import product back in.

Automation is coming, they are trying to get all the cash they can, while they can.
Posted by bulldog95
North Louisiana
Member since Jan 2011
21027 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 7:47 am to
Unions were good in the early 90’s they are terrible for the 2000’s. Obsolete and cause more problems than they solve.
Posted by Bluefin
The Banana Stand
Member since Apr 2011
13385 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 7:50 am to
I was doing some work with a large shipping company several years ago, and spent some time at several ports on the east coast and in Houston. I was amazed at how useless 90% of dock workers are.

Legitimately the crane operators were the only ones who I saw as somewhat valuable. The guys who "oversee" the containers getting loaded onto the trucks are usually chilling in fold out chairs while they collect $75/hr. The guys "organizing" the flow of trucks are just driving in circles and wasting gas around the port listening to sports radio.

As a team, their entire purpose is to move as slowly as possible so that they can go into overtime hours and collect overtime pay for a job they could do in half the time. I witnessed a crane operator pretend to load the same container onto four different trucks because they were on the verge of overtime.

Like all unions, these guys only let their buddies join and reap the benefits. They only reason they're paid handsomely is because every few years one of them gets squished by a container due to a crane operator's negligence.

frick the ILA and I can't wait for them to get replaced by a private VC-backed automation enterprise.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
281843 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 7:50 am to
quote:


I think they turned down a 50% raise already and they want protections against robots

theyre so stupid

That kind of raise will ensure robots ASAP.

I'm team scab/robot
Posted by cssamerican
Member since Mar 2011
7620 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 7:55 am to
I get asking for a raise. I get trying to get the highest raise possible. I don’t understand how employees can tell a business what type of economic decisions they should make over the next decade though. You are the employee if you wanted to make all the management decisions, you should start your own company and become the employer.
This post was edited on 10/2/24 at 8:00 am
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
68357 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 7:57 am to
I typically side with private sector unions in disputes like these, but they turned down a more than generous offer. These striking workers are greedy.
Posted by carhartt
Member since Feb 2013
8057 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 8:00 am to
Against. Asking for a 70-75% pay raise is ridiculous, out of touch and greedy.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
56722 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 8:06 am to
Sad to see all you pink collar email job types complaining about how they gotta pay more for their funko pops and pizza rolls


Every computer in this country could break today and us blue collars would still keep the lights on and keep America going. We’d take care of y’all and yalls old ladies too
Posted by WhiteRussianDude
Member since Feb 2023
409 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 8:10 am to
Unions pervert free markets by providing a means for workers to form a monopoly and blackmail employees/customers for compensation that is a multitude higher than their skills are worth on the open market.

They should be abolished.
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
33828 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 8:22 am to
quote:

Just FYI the union president brings in nearly $1mil in salary from the union,,,his son is the exec VP and brings in more than $600k


That 1%er is cool though, because he's down with the cause.

Just like billionaires are the devil's spawn...except for Oprah and Pritzker, cuz they're awesome.
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
19998 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 8:23 am to
I'm fine with union strikes until they prevent other people who want to work from working. That is just unacceptable and every time it happens, the union should end up losing wages and not get any improvements.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram