Started By
Message

re: Is chasing Theoretical Physics a waste of time if you’re not brilliant?

Posted on 12/28/25 at 10:13 pm to
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
21424 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 10:13 pm to
quote:

Seems like someone who spoke English, had any kind of personality, and had a little common sense would be way ahead of their peers in that field.


That isn't how theoretical physics works. None of that helps you solve the problems.
Posted by Hou_Lawyer
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2019
2175 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 10:31 pm to
Put the fries in the bag.
Posted by DesScorp
Alabama
Member since Sep 2017
9624 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 10:40 pm to
quote:

If you love it don’t stop doing it. Don’t pay attention to what anyone says even if you aren’t making a ton of money or whatever. You will be happier making less money doing what you love versus the alternative.


Do what you love and the money will follow is the worst career advice in the history of career advice. No one is happy that is in constant want and deep debt. And thats how most dreamers end up.

Learn a skill that the market needs and that you don't hate. Make money. Then do what you love for fun.

Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
36037 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 5:58 am to
Try Quantum Physics.....it will challenge all you thought you knew about physics from a .......theoretical standpoint.
Posted by Mr Happy
Member since May 2019
2392 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 6:10 am to
A few years ago I was determined to get a basic understanding of quantum physics. I read two or three books on it but got frustrated because of all the contradictions and nonsensical explanations. I was left feeling that the physicists are just making stuff up to fit the data.

It seems like, historically speaking at least, when scientific explanations are complicated and contradictory, they're often wrong.

I gave up.
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
24147 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 6:26 am to
Then you have an unique take on the subject. Its not always the brightest in a field that makes great discoveries, it is sometimes people that look at things differently. Maybe, they are so far past everyone else they can't see the obvious.
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
19431 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 6:42 am to
quote:

Questioning my ability and my goals.
if you don't try it and observe the results you simultaneously 'have it' and do 'not have it'
Posted by uaslick
Tuscaloosa
Member since May 2011
1205 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 6:44 am to
quote:

Relativity?


Boi, dat ain’t nobody, dats juss my baby daddy.
Posted by Rouge
Floston Paradise
Member since Oct 2004
138204 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 6:47 am to
quote:

But I feel I don’t have “it”


I assume you mean "severe autism" because that is who makes it in those fields. They have a level of singular drive for a specific subject matter that cannot be matched.
Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
20480 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 7:26 am to
I just round pi off to 3 to simplify the math.

This post was edited on 12/29/25 at 7:27 am
Posted by SantaFe
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2019
7649 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 7:31 am to
I did land surveying for about a year and wasn’t making any money at it and heard of a job opening at a Christmas party.

Four physics professors had gotten a grant from the National Science Foundation for proving some probability theory on muons and needed a detector built to test their theory . The detector would operate in a small collider in Germany. I interviewed and got the job. I was to do the engineering on the project and was ‘ given’ 6 grad students to the grunt work. We a had year to build it.

While building this contraption I learned a lot. Like anything else there is a vast amount of politics in science. If there is money politics will follow and you have to be able to navigate it. With this NSF grant other universities were involved . One in Hamburg, Boston U, Univ. of Chicago and Los Alamos. They were responsible for their parts of the project and I got to travel and work at those places.

Without probability all of Quantum physics collapses. I met physics people who had met all the requirements of of PhD but were not allowed to be physics professors, they were called post docs, sort of like a purgatory of physics professors.

After this muon detector was completed I worked on a neutrino detector at Los Alamos. When the grant money runs out the jobs evaporate.
Don’t get any romantic notions about being a physics professor, sure they teach at places like Harvard, but also in places like Nicholls and Grambling.

Now I work construction building bridges and highways.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
297608 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 7:33 am to
quote:

A few years ago I was determined to get a basic understanding of quantum physics. I read two or three books on it but got frustrated because of all the contradictions and nonsensical explanations. I was left feeling that the physicists are just making stuff up to fit the data.


The theories are what makes it interesting. I agree some are pretty far fetched, but I assume its due to my understanding and lack of formal physics education.

Posted by deltadummy
Member since Mar 2025
1708 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 7:34 am to
If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics ~ Richard Feynman


Posted by deltadummy
Member since Mar 2025
1708 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 7:36 am to
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
22797 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 7:47 am to
quote:

Questioning my ability and my goals.

If you aren't capable of Nobel Prize work, don't do it.
Posted by madmaxvol
Infinity + 1 Posts
Member since Oct 2011
21656 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 7:47 am to
quote:

Is chasing Theoretical Physics a waste of time if you’re not brilliant?



There are plenty of Theoretical Physicists out there that enjoy their careers, knowing they aren't going to be the next Richard Feynman.

What really interests you about it? There are some really cool things going on with Neutrino detection and Dark Matter research.

Does it have to be Theoretical Physics. Could you branch into the areas where the lines between Theoretical and Applied Physics become a bit blurred?
Posted by madmaxvol
Infinity + 1 Posts
Member since Oct 2011
21656 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 8:07 am to
quote:

Four physics professors had gotten a grant from the National Science Foundation for proving some probability theory on muons and needed a detector built to test their theory . The detector would operate in a small collider in Germany. I interviewed and got the job. I was to do the engineering on the project and was ‘ given’ 6 grad students to the grunt work. We a had year to build it.

After this muon detector was completed I worked on a neutrino detector at Los Alamos. When the grant money runs out the jobs evaporate.



Right now, joint NSF/DOE projects like those are competing heavily against each other for the declining amount of funding. Constricting availability and astronomically high costs of things like Ge-76 these days, certainly don't help.
Posted by Mr Breeze
The Lunatic Fringe
Member since Dec 2010
6685 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 9:04 am to
quote:

Is chasing Theoretical Physics a waste of time if you’re not brilliant?

Not at all.

We may not understand at the phd physics level, yet maintaining intellectual curiosity in any scientific field keeps my brain engaged and exercised.

Time, for example, is an interesting property. The GPS system is, at root, a large, precise clock system, compensated by both Einstein's General and Special relativity equations.

Absent that, clock errors accumulate at about 38 microseconds a day (IIRC) a large error (1 microsecond ~ 300 meters) when a few 10's of nanosecond time fidelity is needed, related to the speed of light and electromagnetic RF propagation.

Similarly, the cellular system doesn't work without the precise time base derived from GPS timing receivers, synchronizing transmission and reception for multitudes of users at the 100 nanosecond level.

Hawking's second edition of "A Brief History of Time" was simplified from the first and more accessible. Feynman's lectures give a deeper dive into theoretical physics, one example summarized below from his original lecture.


I'll never remotely understand quantum physics yet fascinated by what its practical applications might become. Thus....

Posted by StanSmith
Member since May 2018
1067 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 9:25 am to
If you don't have a strong grasp of calculus, multivariate calculus, differential equations and a few other advanced math topics stick to physics as a fun hobby. I like reading about various topics in physics and have started reading and watching videos about the physics that was covered in the book, The Making of the Atomic Bomb.
Posted by jflsufan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Mar 2013
5023 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 9:55 am to
Theoretical physics can prove that an elephant can hang from a cliff with its tail tied to a daisy.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram