- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is chasing Theoretical Physics a waste of time if you’re not brilliant?
Posted on 12/28/25 at 10:13 pm to FCP
Posted on 12/28/25 at 10:13 pm to FCP
quote:
Seems like someone who spoke English, had any kind of personality, and had a little common sense would be way ahead of their peers in that field.
That isn't how theoretical physics works. None of that helps you solve the problems.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 10:31 pm to The Silverback
Put the fries in the bag.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 10:40 pm to jizzle6609
quote:
If you love it don’t stop doing it. Don’t pay attention to what anyone says even if you aren’t making a ton of money or whatever. You will be happier making less money doing what you love versus the alternative.
Do what you love and the money will follow is the worst career advice in the history of career advice. No one is happy that is in constant want and deep debt. And thats how most dreamers end up.
Learn a skill that the market needs and that you don't hate. Make money. Then do what you love for fun.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 5:58 am to RogerTheShrubber
Try Quantum Physics.....it will challenge all you thought you knew about physics from a .......theoretical standpoint.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 6:10 am to The Silverback
A few years ago I was determined to get a basic understanding of quantum physics. I read two or three books on it but got frustrated because of all the contradictions and nonsensical explanations. I was left feeling that the physicists are just making stuff up to fit the data.
It seems like, historically speaking at least, when scientific explanations are complicated and contradictory, they're often wrong.
I gave up.
It seems like, historically speaking at least, when scientific explanations are complicated and contradictory, they're often wrong.
I gave up.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 6:26 am to The Silverback
Then you have an unique take on the subject. Its not always the brightest in a field that makes great discoveries, it is sometimes people that look at things differently. Maybe, they are so far past everyone else they can't see the obvious.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 6:42 am to The Silverback
quote:if you don't try it and observe the results you simultaneously 'have it' and do 'not have it'
Questioning my ability and my goals.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 6:44 am to thermal9221
quote:
Relativity?
Boi, dat ain’t nobody, dats juss my baby daddy.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 6:47 am to The Silverback
quote:
But I feel I don’t have “it”
I assume you mean "severe autism" because that is who makes it in those fields. They have a level of singular drive for a specific subject matter that cannot be matched.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 7:26 am to The Silverback
I just round pi off to 3 to simplify the math.
This post was edited on 12/29/25 at 7:27 am
Posted on 12/29/25 at 7:31 am to The Silverback
I did land surveying for about a year and wasn’t making any money at it and heard of a job opening at a Christmas party.
Four physics professors had gotten a grant from the National Science Foundation for proving some probability theory on muons and needed a detector built to test their theory . The detector would operate in a small collider in Germany. I interviewed and got the job. I was to do the engineering on the project and was ‘ given’ 6 grad students to the grunt work. We a had year to build it.
While building this contraption I learned a lot. Like anything else there is a vast amount of politics in science. If there is money politics will follow and you have to be able to navigate it. With this NSF grant other universities were involved . One in Hamburg, Boston U, Univ. of Chicago and Los Alamos. They were responsible for their parts of the project and I got to travel and work at those places.
Without probability all of Quantum physics collapses. I met physics people who had met all the requirements of of PhD but were not allowed to be physics professors, they were called post docs, sort of like a purgatory of physics professors.
After this muon detector was completed I worked on a neutrino detector at Los Alamos. When the grant money runs out the jobs evaporate.
Don’t get any romantic notions about being a physics professor, sure they teach at places like Harvard, but also in places like Nicholls and Grambling.
Now I work construction building bridges and highways.
Four physics professors had gotten a grant from the National Science Foundation for proving some probability theory on muons and needed a detector built to test their theory . The detector would operate in a small collider in Germany. I interviewed and got the job. I was to do the engineering on the project and was ‘ given’ 6 grad students to the grunt work. We a had year to build it.
While building this contraption I learned a lot. Like anything else there is a vast amount of politics in science. If there is money politics will follow and you have to be able to navigate it. With this NSF grant other universities were involved . One in Hamburg, Boston U, Univ. of Chicago and Los Alamos. They were responsible for their parts of the project and I got to travel and work at those places.
Without probability all of Quantum physics collapses. I met physics people who had met all the requirements of of PhD but were not allowed to be physics professors, they were called post docs, sort of like a purgatory of physics professors.
After this muon detector was completed I worked on a neutrino detector at Los Alamos. When the grant money runs out the jobs evaporate.
Don’t get any romantic notions about being a physics professor, sure they teach at places like Harvard, but also in places like Nicholls and Grambling.
Now I work construction building bridges and highways.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 7:33 am to Mr Happy
quote:
A few years ago I was determined to get a basic understanding of quantum physics. I read two or three books on it but got frustrated because of all the contradictions and nonsensical explanations. I was left feeling that the physicists are just making stuff up to fit the data.
The theories are what makes it interesting. I agree some are pretty far fetched, but I assume its due to my understanding and lack of formal physics education.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 7:34 am to Mr Happy
If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics ~ Richard Feynman
Posted on 12/29/25 at 7:47 am to The Silverback
quote:
Questioning my ability and my goals.
If you aren't capable of Nobel Prize work, don't do it.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 7:47 am to The Silverback
quote:
Is chasing Theoretical Physics a waste of time if you’re not brilliant?
There are plenty of Theoretical Physicists out there that enjoy their careers, knowing they aren't going to be the next Richard Feynman.
What really interests you about it? There are some really cool things going on with Neutrino detection and Dark Matter research.
Does it have to be Theoretical Physics. Could you branch into the areas where the lines between Theoretical and Applied Physics become a bit blurred?
Posted on 12/29/25 at 8:07 am to SantaFe
quote:
Four physics professors had gotten a grant from the National Science Foundation for proving some probability theory on muons and needed a detector built to test their theory . The detector would operate in a small collider in Germany. I interviewed and got the job. I was to do the engineering on the project and was ‘ given’ 6 grad students to the grunt work. We a had year to build it.
After this muon detector was completed I worked on a neutrino detector at Los Alamos. When the grant money runs out the jobs evaporate.
Right now, joint NSF/DOE projects like those are competing heavily against each other for the declining amount of funding. Constricting availability and astronomically high costs of things like Ge-76 these days, certainly don't help.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 9:04 am to The Silverback
quote:
Is chasing Theoretical Physics a waste of time if you’re not brilliant?
Not at all.
We may not understand at the phd physics level, yet maintaining intellectual curiosity in any scientific field keeps my brain engaged and exercised.
Time, for example, is an interesting property. The GPS system is, at root, a large, precise clock system, compensated by both Einstein's General and Special relativity equations.
Absent that, clock errors accumulate at about 38 microseconds a day (IIRC) a large error (1 microsecond ~ 300 meters) when a few 10's of nanosecond time fidelity is needed, related to the speed of light and electromagnetic RF propagation.
Similarly, the cellular system doesn't work without the precise time base derived from GPS timing receivers, synchronizing transmission and reception for multitudes of users at the 100 nanosecond level.
Hawking's second edition of "A Brief History of Time" was simplified from the first and more accessible. Feynman's lectures give a deeper dive into theoretical physics, one example summarized below from his original lecture.
I'll never remotely understand quantum physics yet fascinated by what its practical applications might become. Thus....

Posted on 12/29/25 at 9:25 am to The Silverback
If you don't have a strong grasp of calculus, multivariate calculus, differential equations and a few other advanced math topics stick to physics as a fun hobby. I like reading about various topics in physics and have started reading and watching videos about the physics that was covered in the book, The Making of the Atomic Bomb.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 9:55 am to The Silverback
Theoretical physics can prove that an elephant can hang from a cliff with its tail tied to a daisy.
Popular
Back to top



0











