- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Im not sure but is what these BRPD are doing, legal?
Posted on 7/11/16 at 10:47 am to monsterballads
Posted on 7/11/16 at 10:47 am to monsterballads
quote:
This is literally the opposite of what happened. The homeowner, trinity, came out telling the COPS to get off her property.
You truly might be the dumbest person in this thread.
The yard isn't fricking base in a game of tag.
The "homeowner" (a renter piece of shite actually) should have been arrested for disturbing the peace for having a disruptive party on "her" property.
In short, please sit in your garage with the car running.
0
Posted on 7/11/16 at 10:48 am to BRTiger2005
in that video the cops were telling the protesters to leave that woman's yard, and they didn't and it looks like thats why they rushed in and started arresting people.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 10:48 am to DBU
quote:
Yes we do.
Cool, i missed that. What happened?
Posted on 7/11/16 at 10:48 am to DBU
quote:
and protesters completely blocking the sidewalk.
By personal experience, I know for a fact that simply standing (even partially) on a sidewalk or any public right-of-way, given the circumstances, can be grounds for arrest. If I recall correctly, it was deemed "obstructing public passage".
I was simply observing a fight between several people outside a bar. I heard the police demanding to "get out of the street" but I assumed they were directing that to the participants in the fight. Next thing I knew I felt a night stick crack across the side of my knee and I went down. Cuffs were applied. Written up but not taken downtown.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 10:48 am to monsterballads
Which means she is lucky they didn't arrest her.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 10:48 am to torrey225
What are the ramifications of not having Ms. Batiste's approval? I guess she might file a complaint at the Police Dept.?
Posted on 7/11/16 at 10:48 am to Golfer
quote:
Yeah, you might want to go re-read servitude and zoning laws.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 10:49 am to Golfer
quote:
Yeah, you might want to go re-read servitude and zoning laws.
I know there is a public servitude and zoning says property owner can't build there but is the actual property line at the street or at the servitude?
I figure the street so they can tax you on the SF of land even though you can't build on it.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 10:49 am to torrey225
quote:
And sidewalk is the owner's land. Not the city's. The city may have installed a sidewalk there but it is the homeowner's property and responsibility. That's why sidewalks become terrible. Homeowners believe the city will come back one day and fix it. There are a few instances (Brightside Drive, for example) where the city maintains the sidewalk.
Oh so if I prefer grass I can just go ahead and tear out the sidewalk and the city will be just fine with it right?
Posted on 7/11/16 at 10:49 am to Salmon
Homeowner called cops but then was telling cops to face they can stay be even though she wanted them gone. She didn't want them people's to know she wanted them gone
Posted on 7/11/16 at 10:50 am to torrey225
quote:
And sidewalk is the owner's land. Not the city's. The city may have installed a sidewalk there but it is the homeowner's property and responsibility.
Ahhhh...no.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 10:50 am to jbgleason
It doesn't matter where the property line is. You cannot completely block the right of passage on the sidewalk. The sidewalk is public.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 10:51 am to bobbyleewilliams
The lack of even basic legal knowledge by some in this thread is sad and astounding.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 10:51 am to Chad504boy
quote:
Homeowner called cops but then was telling cops to face they can stay be even though she wanted them gone. She didn't want them people's to know she wanted them gone
That is what I figured as well. Publicly going against the protesters as a civilian is a bold move
Posted on 7/11/16 at 10:51 am to Chad504boy
quote:Apparently renter.
Homeowner
Posted on 7/11/16 at 10:52 am to Chad504boy
quote:
Homeowner called cops but then was telling cops to face they can stay be even though she wanted them gone. She didn't want them people's to know she wanted them gone
Correct. She didn't want her house destroyed or to be labeled.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 10:52 am to slackster
quote:
Publicly going against the protesters as a civilian is a bold move
would have been awesome if they ran to the private property and then the owner came out with a gun and the protesters were then trapped between the cops and the owner in this weird limbo with so many confused faces
Posted on 7/11/16 at 10:52 am to torrey225
I love when people post stupid shite like this like they are dropping some knowledge when in fact they are completely wrong. You're a fool.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 10:53 am to Wolfhound45
quote:
Apparently renter
Likely grounds for terminating her lease
Posted on 7/11/16 at 10:54 am to DBU
If I owned that place it would be in the process right now. Then I'd lease it to BRPD to use the yard for snatch and grabs.
Page 6 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News