- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If you had to fight a guerrilla war on US turf, where would you choose?
Posted on 2/25/22 at 6:28 am to Jim Rockford
Posted on 2/25/22 at 6:28 am to Jim Rockford
I would not try to protect a major city. I would destroy all the infrastructure I could and leave it behind.
Go to desolate low populations places. Defend those as needed. Launch harassment incursions on their fronts. Disrupt their supply lines from the rear.
I am not sure that an occupation of the U.S. is even remotely possible give the armed populace.
Go to desolate low populations places. Defend those as needed. Launch harassment incursions on their fronts. Disrupt their supply lines from the rear.
I am not sure that an occupation of the U.S. is even remotely possible give the armed populace.
Posted on 2/25/22 at 6:32 am to UndercoverBryologist
quote:NYC
If you were in a similar situations as the Ukrainians?
Posted on 2/25/22 at 6:39 am to UndercoverBryologist
My property backs up to the Natchez Trace and I know it pretty well, don’t think I’d go anywhere else.
Posted on 2/25/22 at 6:42 am to TexasTiger27
quote:sure
Texas! We have guns
quote:very few of you
and will use them.
Posted on 2/25/22 at 7:50 am to UndercoverBryologist
With all of the infrared and nightvision scopes most modern militaries have, urban guerilla warfare would be the ticket. Though surviving in the wilderness would be likely easier, evading capture and setting up ambushes in a large city would be much easier. Think of what the Russians did to the Germans in Leningrad. It was a 900-day siege with the Russians peppering the Germans with snipers and boobytraps until the Germans finally got outflanked and surrounded.
Posted on 2/25/22 at 7:59 am to UndercoverBryologist
Headed to the parent's place in Montana. frick around and find out, putin.
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:10 am to UndercoverBryologist
You'd have to have a few things. Access to water. Access to food, supplies ammunition. The ability to blend into the terrain. A combination of access but at the same time remoteness. The fighters should have the ability to survive in the landscape while at the same time making it very difficult for the opposition to traverse the same terrain.
In my part of the world, I think it would be Echo Canyon near Echo, Utah or Sherman Hill and Telephone Canyon on I-80 in Wyoming. You could easily disrupt east-west travel for the invaders.
Similarly the area between Richfield, Hanksville and Green River, Utah would be easy to get lost in and could disrupt travel on I-70.
I-40 between Asheville, NC and Knoxville, TN would be a similar choke point.
In my part of the world, I think it would be Echo Canyon near Echo, Utah or Sherman Hill and Telephone Canyon on I-80 in Wyoming. You could easily disrupt east-west travel for the invaders.
Similarly the area between Richfield, Hanksville and Green River, Utah would be easy to get lost in and could disrupt travel on I-70.
I-40 between Asheville, NC and Knoxville, TN would be a similar choke point.
This post was edited on 2/25/22 at 8:21 am
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:16 am to Lonnie Utah
West Virginia
Rugged terrain and burning couches for road blocks
Rugged terrain and burning couches for road blocks
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:22 am to lowhound
quote:
With all of the infrared and nightvision scopes most modern militaries have,
I hear you, but lots of BAW's have those things too now days....
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:25 am to jamiegla1
quote:
it depends on the enemy.
This is the correct answer.
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:30 am to UndercoverBryologist
The swamps in LA or FL
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:30 am to Frac the world
There are a few videos of German troops doing this when the allies columns were advancing in Germany. They were killed pretty much instantly.
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:30 am to lowhound
The hog hunting craze has thousands of good ole boys sporting high grade thermal imaging scopes and many have suppressors. Even the civilian population here has a decent supply of night capability. No one wants to be an occupying force here. Their best bet is to take out our grid and leave us to destroy ourselves from within taking us out of the global fight
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:47 am to UndercoverBryologist
Probably San Diego. You could go sailing between skirmishes and probably still find a taco stand somewhere when your done.
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:50 am to bayoudude
The Appalachian mountains no mechanized vehicles would get to you easily blow the bridges on I 40 I 81 I 77 I 85 only thing would be missiles and you wouldn’t have any large numbers of people in any location. Plus blowing the bridge causes huge problems for helicopter refueling making missions in the mountains very difficult now other aircraft not as much. but with drone heat seeking vision ect that’s gonna be a problem. Some of these drones as you have seen are insanely effective. You need a bunker under ground with 6 months of supplies to even have a prayer few containers and a hell of an excavator. Key don’t get into a dang war.
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:51 am to Wolfhound45
quote:
Appalachians (including sub-ranges like the Smokies)?
This would be my preferred environment as well.
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:52 am to UndercoverBryologist
quote:
Appalachians (including sub-ranges like the Smokies)?
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:52 am to UndercoverBryologist
quote:
If you had to fight a guerrilla war on US turf, where would you choose?
If I'm trying to invade the US....I would not want to frick with Louisiana (difficult terrain, armed populace, impossible to move vehicles if you can't control the bridges) or Texas (literally everyone is ready to fight you).
If I'm defending the US, I would really hate to go up against anyone in Kansas or Oklahoma, where the terrain is wide open and there's no place to really hide your movements.
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:55 am to Cracker
quote:
You need a bunke
Plenty of old mines back in them hills baw.
Popular
Back to top


1









