- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/15/16 at 5:12 pm to cas4t
quote:quite the opposite. it would mean he'd go to prison for the crimes he pleaded guilty to. he is serving probation now instead of sitting in jail.
What does having your probation revoked mean? Like, let him off of probation?
Posted on 7/15/16 at 5:15 pm to joeyb147
quote:Wait, WTF.
quite the opposite. it would mean he'd go to prison for the crimes he pleaded guilty to. he is serving probation now instead of sitting in jail.
So they're arguing to revoke his probation for the charges that were dropped?
That's our legal system in a nutshell.
Posted on 7/15/16 at 5:16 pm to VerlanderBEAST
1. The video is edited so I'm not sure whether or not he did or did not ask for his ID
2. If he truly didn't ask for it, the cop needs to find a new line of work
2. If he truly didn't ask for it, the cop needs to find a new line of work
Posted on 7/15/16 at 5:20 pm to Old Sarge
the full video was released (it's linked somewhere in here)
and yes, they never asked for his id in the full video
and yes, they never asked for his id in the full video
Posted on 7/15/16 at 5:26 pm to VerlanderBEAST
Attorney William Claiborne is going to set him right.
This post was edited on 7/15/16 at 5:28 pm
Posted on 7/15/16 at 5:27 pm to LSUballs
quote:
Should he have to do that to these dick head cops? No. But if he does he doesn't get tazed and arrested.
That's quite the assessment of what rights we the people once had.
So give up your rights or get assaulted and arrested without cause?
Posted on 7/15/16 at 5:29 pm to shel311
quote:
So they're arguing to revoke his probation for the charges that were dropped?
That's our legal system in a nutshell.
And some people wonder why police in some parts of the country aren't popular.
Meruca
Posted on 7/15/16 at 5:45 pm to dgnx6
I'd like to hear your thoughts now that we know th cops are not doing the right thing
Posted on 7/15/16 at 5:55 pm to shel311
There'a clearly a widespread, systemic problem with cops in this country. Some of the problem has racial undertones, some of it is just cops being dumbasses and abusing their power. The culture needs to change and they need better training so that things like this don't happen, when anyone with common sense could have gotten through this encounter without tazing or arresting the guy.
Posted on 7/15/16 at 5:56 pm to shel311
They didn't botch an arrest, they actually gained one
Posted on 7/15/16 at 6:02 pm to Chad504boy
quote:Charges dropped, they nailed it!!!
They didn't botch an arrest, they actually gained one
Posted on 7/15/16 at 6:14 pm to VerlanderBEAST
The police did nothing unethical here. They approached who they thought was a guy they were looking for. He was very uncooperative. All he had to do was do what the police told him to do and it would have been over and done with in minutes without incident. Instead, he resisted and made things much harder on himself.
Posted on 7/15/16 at 6:15 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
the later lie has little to nuffin to do with how the first 2 minutes went. The officers did not want this guy in the vehicle and has justiable reason for that.
It absolutely has something to do with it. The cop had a responsibility to identify the person he is serving a warrant for. He decided to do this by asking Patrick for his name rather then ask for ID. Patrick complied with this request and provided his name. If he would have done what he lied about doing the 2 minutes would have gone very different.
Posted on 7/15/16 at 6:17 pm to SUB
quote:
There'a clearly a widespread, systemic problem with cops in this country.
And what do you base this on?
Posted on 7/15/16 at 6:22 pm to Whatafrekinchessiebr
quote:
It absolutely has something to do with it. The cop had a responsibility to identify the person he is serving a warrant for. He decided to do this by asking Patrick for his name rather then ask for ID. Patrick complied with this request and provided his name. If he would have done what he lied about doing the 2 minutes would have gone very different.
The first thing a cop is supposed to do in this situation is ask the guy what his name is. The second thing the cop is supposed to do is ask for ID. The cops never had a chance to ask for the ID because Patrick started acting weird and uncooperative. The cops had to get him under control for their own safety.
If Patrick had cooperated the 2 minutes would have gone very different.
This post was edited on 7/15/16 at 6:24 pm
Posted on 7/15/16 at 6:35 pm to Chad504boy
quote:Hilarious
the later lie has little to nuffin to do with how the first 2 minutes went.
Posted on 7/15/16 at 6:39 pm to motorbreath
The second thing the cop asked was for him to stand up out of the car... which Patrick did... after telling him his name... twice...
Posted on 7/15/16 at 6:45 pm to VerlanderBEAST
Ok I think these cops fricked up on this one, but the kid was a dick head from the second they walked up. Everybody in this situation failed.
Posted on 7/15/16 at 6:53 pm to joeyb147
quote:
The second thing the cop asked was for him to stand up out of the car... which Patrick did...
Yeah then the cop asked him to turn around and put his hands on the car and he retreated back into his car. That was the pivotal moment. At that point he forced the cops to take action. If he turns around and puts his hands on the car and continues to comply, everything is resolved in moments without incident.
Why is it so hard to just do what the police say?
Page 34 of 48
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News