- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How would your state fare in a war with each of its neighboring states?
Posted on 5/19/18 at 4:42 pm to SeeeeK
Posted on 5/19/18 at 4:42 pm to SeeeeK
quote:
we would skull frick Illinois, Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahomo, and Arkansas
Ehh. Slow your roll on Arkansas.
The Ozarks would be a very difficult place to mount an offensive campaign against a population like arkansans
0
Posted on 5/19/18 at 4:43 pm to weagle99
I have 7 border states and another 3 less than 50 miles away.
That’s nearly 20% of the entire States.
That’s nearly 20% of the entire States.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 4:54 pm to white perch
quote:
Mississippi would win by playing defense. All the surrounding states would rush in for an invasion then wear themselves out and use up too much fuel trying to find anything to attack because we’re so damn spread out then they’d just leave
Yup. Very few good Targets in Mississippi. Population is too spread out
Posted on 5/19/18 at 4:57 pm to magildachunks
quote:
That's what the British thought about their manpower advantage.
Took us just over an hour to defeat them
People underestimate home field advantage and with a terrain like south Louisiana, with all the secret, navigable twisting waterways it makes it an impossible place to invade.
Just look at how the US fared against Vietnam. Should have been a cakewalk. Not so fast my friend. Vietnam and south Louisiana climate and topography aren't all that different. There's a reason that south Louisiana has such a huge Vietnamese population
This post was edited on 5/19/18 at 4:58 pm
Posted on 5/19/18 at 4:58 pm to nola000
So la takes over ms. Now Alabama is out neighbor. I'm sure we take them and then from there we grow and take Texas and the rest of the south.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 4:59 pm to weagle99
Well good luck beating Louisianians in the swamp. And we have Barksdale.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 5:00 pm to nola000
We kicked the NV/Cong’s arse my friend, blame that loss on the politicians
Posted on 5/19/18 at 5:00 pm to white perch
quote:
Mississippi
No one is going to attack the Landmass. Even if you win, best case scenario is that you own Mississippi now.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 5:05 pm to weagle99
Louisiana could beat Mississippi or Arky but get its shite pushed in by Texas.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 5:06 pm to teke184
Bullshiit
Posted on 5/19/18 at 5:08 pm to BlackPawnMartyr
quote:
educated men and women
quote:
coonasses
Oxymoron.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 5:09 pm to 3deadtrolls
quote:
No one is going to attack the Landmass. Even if you win, best case scenario is that you own Mississippi now.
We'd do it for complete control of the Old Man's southern parts.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 5:11 pm to DeafJam73
Y’all act is if the swamp is impervious to bunker busters or napalm 
Posted on 5/19/18 at 5:11 pm to Pecker
quote:
Texas decimates all of its neighbors, probably all at the same time.
You sure about that?
Don't forget that just about every state that surrounds Texas has no good targets to hit as far as big city centers, most of their populations are spread out in the countryside and with the exception of New Mexico, all of them can live off the land.
Houston, Dallas, San Antonio and Austin can all be shelled and bombed from the air and that would take care of most of the population in Texas right there. Think about Switzerland during World War II and why the Nazis didn't go after them.
Pyrrhic victories for Texas in those States.
This doesn't even take into consideration the water issues that Texas has trying to sustain its large population being dense City centers in a mostly dry state. Oklahoma would damn off their feeder Rivers to Texas and dry out Dallas in no time.
San Antonio and Houston would have a problem after Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama blockades their Coast from receiving food shipments.
Texas' large population being concentrated in major city centers is a ball and chain. The small town Texan would have to abandon their fellow Texans in Houston Dallas San Antonio and Austin and take refuge in the forest cover and natural water supply in Southeast Texas
This post was edited on 5/19/18 at 5:16 pm
Posted on 5/19/18 at 5:12 pm to weagle99
I would think AZ would easily outgun California, New Mexico, Nevada, Colorado, and possibly Utah simply because of how easy it is to conceal carry here.
As for supplies...Utah might have us outbeat. You ever seen a Mormon family's basement??? Friends of ours lived in Utah. Told us all the homes they looked at when looking for a house had these huge dry storage pantries in the basement. Something about how Mormons are supposed to always keep several months worth of food, etc. stocked in their home. Mormon doomsday preppers basically
ETA: Ok just saw the map above....looks like AZ might not be able to beat New Mexico and Nevada
As for supplies...Utah might have us outbeat. You ever seen a Mormon family's basement??? Friends of ours lived in Utah. Told us all the homes they looked at when looking for a house had these huge dry storage pantries in the basement. Something about how Mormons are supposed to always keep several months worth of food, etc. stocked in their home. Mormon doomsday preppers basically
ETA: Ok just saw the map above....looks like AZ might not be able to beat New Mexico and Nevada
This post was edited on 5/19/18 at 5:13 pm
Posted on 5/19/18 at 5:13 pm to nola000
Texans would be too busy making up lies/bragging about the Alamo or something like that, bunch of blowhards
Posted on 5/19/18 at 5:15 pm to nola000
Now post population sizes of each state.
We also have Ft. Hood and would take Barksdale immediately for air superiority.
Barksdale would literally be the first target Texas attacks
We also have Ft. Hood and would take Barksdale immediately for air superiority.
Barksdale would literally be the first target Texas attacks
Posted on 5/19/18 at 5:16 pm to 50_Tiger
Never find the buffs, you’d be glass in a couple of hours
Posted on 5/19/18 at 5:18 pm to weagle99
I dont think anyone really wants to invade FL with all the crazy we have going on.
So FL could probably just sit out the war if they felt like it.
So FL could probably just sit out the war if they felt like it.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 5:26 pm to 777Tiger
Lol I’m beside myself at how many delusional Louisianians believe they could take Texas or any state outside of Mississippi.
We have the largest mechanized unit in the country.
Those B-52’s at Barksdale better be in the air premptive to War beginning. Lol....
We have the largest mechanized unit in the country.
Those B-52’s at Barksdale better be in the air premptive to War beginning. Lol....
This post was edited on 5/19/18 at 5:27 pm
Page 5 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News