- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

How would your state fare in a war with each of its neighboring states?
Posted on 5/19/18 at 12:25 pm
Posted on 5/19/18 at 12:25 pm
No Federal involvement or allies. Mexico is considered a neighbor for Texas for this discussion. Canada for Alaska.
Bonus: Would your state do better to invade the neighbor or play defense and fight a war of attrition similar to Soviets vs Germany?
Bonus: Would your state do better to invade the neighbor or play defense and fight a war of attrition similar to Soviets vs Germany?
This post was edited on 5/19/18 at 12:28 pm
Posted on 5/19/18 at 12:29 pm to weagle99
Louisiana. Play defense. Most heavily armed state last I checked.
Also we have tons of spies in Houston.
ETA: to clarify, we don't beat Texas. Our terrain, terrorist tactics, and their own indigenous invaders beat Texas.
You can't starve out a coonass.
Also we have tons of spies in Houston.
ETA: to clarify, we don't beat Texas. Our terrain, terrorist tactics, and their own indigenous invaders beat Texas.
You can't starve out a coonass.
This post was edited on 5/19/18 at 2:29 pm
Posted on 5/19/18 at 12:29 pm to weagle99
My state borders a bunch of gay Aggies and sister kissers—we would be okay.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 12:31 pm to weagle99
I'm in Illinois.
I'd say pretty good. Have the thugs in Chicago and the rest of the state is gun loving rednecks.
I'd say pretty good. Have the thugs in Chicago and the rest of the state is gun loving rednecks.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 12:33 pm to weagle99
The answer is defense to every state. I really don’t think there is much difference between the average baw from any southeastern state. South Florida would be the easiest target. Other then that its just a population thing. I certainly wouldn’t want to be in a raid party in rural Mississippi
Posted on 5/19/18 at 12:34 pm to weagle99
Louisiana would beat Mississippi and Arkansas and then get swallowed by Texas, however; if we fight Mississippi and Arkansas first and then Texas fights the other neighboring states first, then we can hope they take a big enough hit to give us a fighting chance.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 12:35 pm to weagle99
Is we surrender to Texas do we get a Buc-ee's?
Posted on 5/19/18 at 12:36 pm to el Gaucho
quote:
We could kick Texas arse
Ha Ha Baw you got the dumb
Posted on 5/19/18 at 12:38 pm to weagle99
New York would destroy New Jersey, Vermont, Mass, and Connecticut.
Pennsylvania's rural blue collar population would put up a good fight using guerrilla tactics.
Obviously NY's best fighters will come from upstate. The city is full of pansies who will probably refuse to take part in the fighting.
Also Quebec and Ontario would probably surrender immediately.
Pennsylvania's rural blue collar population would put up a good fight using guerrilla tactics.
Obviously NY's best fighters will come from upstate. The city is full of pansies who will probably refuse to take part in the fighting.
Also Quebec and Ontario would probably surrender immediately.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 12:39 pm to weagle99
Are we able to do a state at a timeor is it all out war?
If it's all out war then each state would get divided. South LA would be against Houston area and South MS. I think LA would do better invading. North LA would get the bluffs of MS and Arkansas. Would be better holding off because that's what they would do. Invade North Texas.
If it's all out war then each state would get divided. South LA would be against Houston area and South MS. I think LA would do better invading. North LA would get the bluffs of MS and Arkansas. Would be better holding off because that's what they would do. Invade North Texas.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 12:39 pm to weagle99
Texas would be able to crush Oklahoma, Louisiana and New Mexico all at the same time
Then we would take over Mexico
It’s not even debatable
Then we would take over Mexico
It’s not even debatable
Posted on 5/19/18 at 12:39 pm to weagle99
Landmass would go down
RKansas would put up a fight
Texas is big for nothing
RKansas would put up a fight
Texas is big for nothing
Posted on 5/19/18 at 12:41 pm to weagle99
North Florida would Oark south Florida
Posted on 5/19/18 at 12:43 pm to Old Sarge
All that’s in Texas is steers and queers
Posted on 5/19/18 at 12:49 pm to weagle99
Missouri is full of gun toting rednecks once you leave st.louis and kc going any direction.
we would skull frick Illinois, Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahomo, and Arkansas.
Southern Illinois would join us to skull frick Springfield up to Chicago. They hate those fricks for shitting on their state and making it broke.
we would skull frick Illinois, Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahomo, and Arkansas.
Southern Illinois would join us to skull frick Springfield up to Chicago. They hate those fricks for shitting on their state and making it broke.
This post was edited on 5/19/18 at 1:00 pm
Posted on 5/19/18 at 12:49 pm to Hu_Flung_Pu
quote:
Are we able to do a state at a timeor is it all out war?
That makes a yuuuge difference.
Tennessee would overwhelm us with sheer size and population if it's one on one.
If it's a free for all Tennessee has eight neighbors they have to fight, Louisiana and R-Kansas have to worry about Texas, and al-Abama has its hands full with Georgia.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 12:50 pm to weagle99
Georgia would handle everyone fairly easily, but Florida might be a challenge with it's meth army
This post was edited on 5/19/18 at 12:51 pm
Popular
Back to top

60





