Started By
Message

re: How generations plan to transfer assets

Posted on 4/3/25 at 11:49 am to
Posted by forkedintheroad
Member since Feb 2025
250 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 11:49 am to
I have no strong disagreement with the notion of enjoying some of your wealth while alive, but this right here

quote:

the general concept is most people vastly over save for retirement


Is bullshite of the highest order.
Posted by Slagathor
Makin' jokes about your teeny tiny
Member since Jul 2007
38745 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 11:53 am to
As all my wealth is tied up in Beanie Babies, I just plan on giving the max number of tax-free ones to my dog each year.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
59289 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 11:53 am to
quote:

This is interesting…and largely true. What I don’t understand about the statistics is how the percentages can add up to more than 100%.


I don’t think those are mutually exclusive answers to a question.

They are independent questions that presumably give insight into the thinking if each generation.
Posted by bird35
Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
13075 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 12:00 pm to
My boomer parents set up a life insurance policy for my kids where my kids will receive 100k from my parents when I die.

I usually don’t offer thoughts on how they spend their money or what they plan to do with it because it’s not mine. They earned it, they can do whatever they want to with it. But this time they asked.

I told them my kids are in college and 20,000 after college graduation will help them much more than 100,000 when they are in their 60s.


The boomers didn’t listen and bought the policy anyway.

I guess it will be a nice reminder of the kids grandparents when they are grandparents themselves.

Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
18990 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 12:12 pm to
If you look at the questions, you could actually answer Yes to all 3. None of them are an all or nothing option.

Depending on how you read them, if you look at Q1 & Q3, "I want my kids to enjoy my money while alive" & "I plan to distribute some wealth during my lifetime". If you give your kids a portion of your wealth while alive, you have now satisfied questions 1 & 3; and could still have enough money for #2.
Posted by TorchtheFlyingTiger
1st coast
Member since Jan 2008
2606 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 12:29 pm to
Reality has set in for Boomers most of whom haven't saved enough for their own needs much less their heirs. Younger generations meanwhile are paying for their adult kids' bills and health care to age 26 and beyond. X and millenials will soon realize most of them are underfunded for their own retirements.
Posted by dat yat
Chef Pass
Member since Jun 2011
4647 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 12:58 pm to
I am older Gen X. My folks are Silent Gen, still kicking and doing very well financially. My sibs and I don't need an inheritance, but it could be substantial if parents don't have major prolonged illness at the end.

When my paternal GM passed, dad only inherited about $100K. He divided it up between kids, grands and great-grands and said to do something nice for yourself. I will do something similar with my kids so I get to see them doing more than I would with it.
Posted by Fat and Happy
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2013
18528 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 1:11 pm to
I think most folks that are 40s and 50s are gonn not be all that wealthy after 65 as cost keeps rising.

Choices will either be keep working or live modest
Posted by faraway
Member since Nov 2022
3218 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 1:12 pm to
only one of those generations has assets. easy to sound selfless when you don't have anything.
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
37680 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

I am betting those numbers change as people get older.


Yep. The closer you are to trying to figure out how to enjoy life without working until you die, the more these numbers will shift.
Posted by sparkinator
Lake Claiborne
Member since Dec 2007
4837 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 3:18 pm to
I’m 61. Four years ago I ended up with a considerable amount of money due to some items I inherited from my grandparents. I invested all the money in rental vacation property that I make money off when they are rented. My kids can use then anytime they want. They will inherit the property when I die, but the income will be part of my retirement income.

I haven’t spent a penny of that windfall, only invested it. I spent a few tens of thousands out of pocket on the properties as well as a lot of time updating them.

So I will hold on to them until I die ( or close to it) but my kids will benefit more than me.

Does that make me selfish?
Posted by ManWithNoNsme
Member since Feb 2022
753 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 3:20 pm to
Lot of Boomer hate in the comments.
Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
34066 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 3:23 pm to
Chart is fake, how can you be this gullible?
Posted by Basura Blanco
Member since Dec 2011
10579 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

I am betting those numbers change as people get older.


This is the only reason the numbers are what they are.

When you are young you are of the belief you have all the time in the world to make bank. You also have not had the opportunity to be massively disappointed in watching family members act the arse.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21397 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

rampant inflation negates all of that shite.


Which is why saving your money in a normal checking or savings account is an awful idea.

Property, side hustle, stock markets, bonds... Anything but leaving it liquid.
Posted by Barbados
Member since Nov 2024
1707 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

My parents won't shut the hell up about leaving me money,


Nothing is stopping them from doing it now

Except this chart
Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
34066 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 3:37 pm to
You can only gift so much each year in cash.
I think it's $16K this year, but it goes up every year.

A friend does other things, too, like tickets, vacations, etc..


ETA: $19K this year..
This post was edited on 4/3/25 at 3:39 pm
Posted by TorchtheFlyingTiger
1st coast
Member since Jan 2008
2606 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 3:49 pm to
The gift limits are per individual ($19k). So double if you are married and twice again if kid has a spouse. Besides, if you gift more you just file a simple IRS form and it comes out of your $14 million individual lifetime estate tax exemption. If it sunsets in 2026 it may go down to $7m per individual, not an issue for most here.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
35413 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 3:52 pm to
Of course, we had dipshits actually supporting an estate tax (muh fair share!) on this site. An inheritance/estate tax is nothing but stupidity and class envy.
Posted by DakIsNoLB
Member since Sep 2015
1027 posts
Posted on 4/3/25 at 4:13 pm to
Good for them if they have assets to transfer, but the primary goal is to not be a burden on my kids. The surviving spouse needs to be taken care of, and then if there's anything left, then the kids get it. If it's zero, but they didn't have to come out for anything, then that's a win.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram