- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: House across from Walk On's in Zachary
Posted on 12/4/23 at 12:13 pm to dlambe5
Posted on 12/4/23 at 12:13 pm to dlambe5
quote:
We are the only species in this world that pays for the land that we live on then they tax that land on top of that.
Weird framing. We are the only species in this world that pays for...anything. Unless those squirrels in my backyard are bartering those acorns in their cheeks.
2
Posted on 12/4/23 at 12:18 pm to facher08
I’m sure that female squirrels are bartering by accepting his nuts in order to eat nuts.
Posted on 12/4/23 at 12:22 pm to teke184
Looking at the way that circle is sutuated I would be pretty pissed too.
Not sure what the planning was in relation to build time for the homeowner or the options for rerouting Barsket Road, but frick that looks bad.
Not sure what the planning was in relation to build time for the homeowner or the options for rerouting Barsket Road, but frick that looks bad.
Posted on 12/4/23 at 12:27 pm to frequent flyer
quote:
Anyone know the back story here? The house looks neglected (possibly empty), and it's directly across from the Walk On's development.
He's mad that they built on their own property. They offered to build him a house, he refused. They offered to build him on one of their lots. He refused. They offered to build him anywhere and he refused. At least that's how I understood it. Guy is a tool.
Posted on 12/4/23 at 12:30 pm to facher08
True but the government doesnt touch his nuts either.
Posted on 12/4/23 at 12:31 pm to frequent flyer
It has been there since at least 2017
Posted on 12/4/23 at 12:33 pm to teke184
quote:
Hence the passive aggressive sign.
not sure I'd call that sign passive aggressive
Posted on 12/4/23 at 12:34 pm to frequent flyer
Posted on 12/4/23 at 12:45 pm to frequent flyer
Take the dough, build somewhere else and be happy.
Posted on 12/4/23 at 12:48 pm to frequent flyer
It sounds like that feller should get into the hog raising bidness.
Posted on 12/4/23 at 12:50 pm to Commandeaux
quote:
Developers have been trying to get this person to sell for some time and he refuses.
I’d sell for double the appraisal value or they could shove it
Posted on 12/4/23 at 12:51 pm to deltaland
I want to say he asked for triple value and that is when they quit negotiating with him.
Posted on 12/4/23 at 12:53 pm to teke184
quote:
To explain the bitching, the traffic circle and other work on that highway ended up cutting off their existing driveway and left them with an oddly shaped plot of land which cuts its ability to be resold considerably.
History is destined to repeat itself
Posted on 12/4/23 at 12:56 pm to johnnyrocket
quote:LADEQ has all sorts of "smell" regulations. The powers that be would send in LADEQ to shut that down quickly.
Have a pig farm and let the smell piss off Karen and Soccer moms.
Posted on 12/4/23 at 12:57 pm to teke184
quote:which is dumb. I bet he could have gotten 2X easy, which would be a nice win.
I want to say he asked for triple value and that is when they quit negotiating with him.
Posted on 12/4/23 at 1:00 pm to teke184
quote:
I want to say he asked for triple value and that is when they quit negotiating with him.
So he built a house with knowledge of this development, tried to hold out for a triple return, so they went another route and made his property worth less than he started. A little FAFO on his part? He thought he had a pure supply and demand situation with no choice on the part of the developer to seek a little governmental assistance and intervention?
I guess he found out the American dream doesn’t include getting to extort a developer when the government, which stands to make a lot more tax money from the development than his property tax, can just exercise a little eminent domain.
Posted on 12/4/23 at 1:06 pm to tigerfan84
Posted on 12/4/23 at 1:09 pm to chinhoyang
Oh hell naw, that looks miserable.
Posted on 12/4/23 at 1:14 pm to Jack Bauers HnK
He built the house in 2004 according to Google Earth. Back then, there was absolutely nothing out there.
Posted on 12/4/23 at 1:16 pm to Snipe
The Gov screwed up by not taking it when the value was lower. The Gov/ developers could have just forced him to sell under Imm Dom and told him to pound sand.
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News