- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Grizzly vs SW Croc vs Siberian Tiger vs African Lion vs Anaconda
Posted on 12/28/21 at 1:41 pm to glassman
Posted on 12/28/21 at 1:41 pm to glassman
quote:
A big coastal grizzly is the apex land predator on this planet.
Or perhaps a polar bear.
Or perhaps a Kodiak bear, which is larger than the Grizzly.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 1:44 pm to dchog
Yea a Kodiak towers a grizzly.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 1:44 pm to dchog
They are all Ursus arctos horribilis
I love typing that
I love typing that
Posted on 12/28/21 at 1:44 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:
jaguar jumping into the waters edge to rip a croc out of the water and kill it with ease.
That was a badass hunt by that Jag.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 1:44 pm to Tornado Alley
Bears are absolute death incarnate. The Romans killed animals by the thousands in the coliseum and bears killed all.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 1:45 pm to UpToPar
quote:
The average weight of a siberian tiger is around 500lbs. The average weight of a coastal brown bear is 900lbs.
Yeah, but the tiger could catch the grizzly slipping and latch on to it enough so it will then not be fighting at 100%. Size doesn't do you any good when you can't catch the opponent.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 1:45 pm to TeddyPadillac
For the purpose of this discussion, its got to be saltwater crocs, not those dinky south American caimans
Posted on 12/28/21 at 1:48 pm to OweO
Grizzlies can run in excess of 30mph. They are not big lumbering lard asses. They are big lumbering athletic killing machines. They routinely kill large ungulates.
A tiger would never be stupid enough to take a shot at a 1500 lb grizzly, if we're doing the whole "in the wild" thing.
A polar bear is the only thing on this planet that can throw hands with a full grown griz.
A tiger would never be stupid enough to take a shot at a 1500 lb grizzly, if we're doing the whole "in the wild" thing.
A polar bear is the only thing on this planet that can throw hands with a full grown griz.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 1:50 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
For the purpose of this discussion, its got to be saltwater crocs, not those dinky south American caimans
Saltwater crocs get huge... well over 2,000 pounds, but they need to be able to use water to their advantage or they are going to lose in the end.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 1:53 pm to burger bearcat
Ya'll are sleeping on the snake, it is literally 100% muscle.
Honestly, whoever gets the drop is going to win, everyone can beat the other depending on scenario.
Honestly, whoever gets the drop is going to win, everyone can beat the other depending on scenario.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 1:53 pm to LSUBoo
what's the point of zebras? they seem like fricking assholes.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 1:54 pm to OweO
quote:
Yeah, but the tiger could catch the grizzly slipping and latch on to it enough so it will then not be fighting at 100%
If the tiger stands any chance at all its with an ambush, and the tiger better connect on the first shot. Once the grizz knows the tigers there it's game over.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 1:54 pm to burger bearcat
Have sex with his mother.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 1:55 pm to arcalades
quote:
always some ignorant posters who think the grizzly is some mythical 15 ft tall beast. a siberian tiger and grizzly are very very close in size
The bear on average will weigh almost twice that of the tiger.
In what world is that very very close in size?
and what the bear has that the others don't is an incredibly thick fur and skin to protect it much more than the lion or tiger can.
quote:
a bear is not good nor has any experience fighting or hunting.
Yeah bears have no experience fighting. They live in harmony together and never fight each other over pussy and/or territory like every other animal on the planet.
LINK
This sloth bear LINK, which was smaller than the Bengal tiger attacking it, held it's own, but yeah a 500-600lb siberian tiger is going to take down a 900lb coastal grizzly.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 1:57 pm to armsdealer
quote:
Ya'll are sleeping on the snake, it is literally 100% muscle.
anaconda don't want none unless you got buns hun
Posted on 12/28/21 at 2:02 pm to burger bearcat
On land there isn’t much that’s gonna frick with a grizzly. Those things are just a different kind of mean. However if the fight is in the water then I’d pick the Anaconda from over any of them. Hard to fight underwater.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 2:03 pm to arcalades
I know you probably just picked some arbitrary number...
But both of these animals comes close to 15'. Both tiger and kodiak can reach over 10' in height while standing on their hind legs.
But both of these animals comes close to 15'. Both tiger and kodiak can reach over 10' in height while standing on their hind legs.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 2:06 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
what's the point of zebras? they seem like fricking assholes.
I don't know why, but this made me chuckle.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 2:07 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
A polar bear is the only thing on this planet that can throw hands with a full grown griz.
I don't know why you keep glossing over the Kodiak bear, which is larger, on average, than a grizzly.
Popular
Back to top
