- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Flock camera map
Posted on 6/8/26 at 6:04 pm to weagle1999
Posted on 6/8/26 at 6:04 pm to weagle1999
There are two out here in the middle of nowhere
It would be a shame if someone was leading a dove and accidentally blasted them.
It would be a shame if someone was leading a dove and accidentally blasted them.
0
Posted on 6/8/26 at 6:16 pm to fightin tigers
Nothing is illegal about taking photos in public...
Posted on 6/8/26 at 6:19 pm to Roy Curado
quote:
Nothing is illegal about taking photos in public...
Tracking your movements and keeping a recorded record without probable cause should be. Recording people for commercial profit is also illegal.
Too many people are willing to give up their rights so other can profit so this is where we end up.
This post was edited on 6/8/26 at 6:21 pm
Posted on 6/8/26 at 6:21 pm to Marco Esquandolas
quote:
Los Angeles has thousands, but hardly any in Compton.
Seems odd…
Posted on 6/8/26 at 6:28 pm to fightin tigers
I did not think there would be a single TD member that would anonymously upvote this practice, much less some defending it
Check their IPs
Check their IPs
Posted on 6/8/26 at 6:32 pm to Sun God
quote:
I did not think there would be a single TD member that would anonymously upvote this practice, much less some defending it
The has been a big populist push to sign up for more big government to protect the public. Maybe it is Russian/China bots that have been able to weave this narrative into society.
Hard to believe 5 years ago we saw government overreach single out individuals and threaten to fine and punish them for congregating. Now we have people asking to make it easier by siding with these cameras.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 6:34 pm to weagle1999
None in my town
Posted on 6/8/26 at 6:36 pm to weagle1999
I’ve got one at both entrances to my neighborhood. The blue light on them is great.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 6:37 pm to weagle1999
Our city government is suing to keep local journalists from requesting information and video from them on the premise of “safety”.
It’s a full on fricking coordinated surveillance effort. That should bother more people.
LPM - Louisville Metro Sues to Keep Camera Info/Video Private
It’s a full on fricking coordinated surveillance effort. That should bother more people.
LPM - Louisville Metro Sues to Keep Camera Info/Video Private
Posted on 6/8/26 at 7:15 pm to BluegrassBelle
Low reading comprehension in this thread.
This post was edited on 6/8/26 at 7:18 pm
Posted on 6/8/26 at 7:55 pm to Bigfishchoupique
The grammar mistakes don’t help.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 9:25 pm to weagle1999
There is one listed in my community, Flower Mound. The town has a very strict rule and has rejected Flock cameras until they meet the full requirements the state requires. No other community in DFW does this.
That one may be operated illegally. Sending the information to my councilman to find out if this was licensed. If not, the town has sued before to force removal.
That one may be operated illegally. Sending the information to my councilman to find out if this was licensed. If not, the town has sued before to force removal.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 9:54 pm to weagle1999
Welp, I can't leave my neighborhood if I don't want to be on camera.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 4:31 am to weagle1999
Certainly all these flock cameras have power cables? Certainly all of us own a pair of wire snips?
Posted on 6/9/26 at 4:41 am to Bamajedi
Paint ball guns too.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 5:31 am to fightin tigers
quote:
Tracking your movements and keeping a recorded record without probable cause should be.
Recording people for commercial profit is also illegal.
The first statement is debatable. The second is patently false.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 6:23 am to weagle1999
Wait until you find out they sell images to insurance companies and others. There is a guy in Lafayette that has been doing this for a while, setting up banks of cameras on power poles and sells access to insurance companies and others.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 6:26 am to weagle1999
Wait until you find out they sell images to insurance companies and others. There is a guy in Lafayette that has been doing this for a while, setting up banks of cameras on power poles around Acadiana and sells access to insurance companies and others.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 6:32 am to WillieD
quote:
It’s a choice to drive on public roads
I'm not driving I'm traveling
Posted on 6/9/26 at 6:32 am to forkedintheroad
quote:
The second is patently false
So I can legally set up a system of cameras to autonomously monitor you and your kids then sell that data to whoever wants to pay for it.
You are in public so you have no expectation of privacy.
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News