Started By
Message

re: Electric cars cleaner than any gas-only car for 97 percent of U.S. drivers

Posted on 6/6/17 at 10:39 pm to
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 10:39 pm to
quote:


Solar will never be the answer to anything other than very small needs. Wind is extraordinarily cost prohibitive.


So leave the fossil fuels for industry.. solar could quite easily power your house if you live in a sunny area.

Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
35971 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 10:40 pm to
quote:

Why do people get so defensive over fossil fuels on this website?


Because we are clearly trying to take guns, force government healthcare, raise taxes, make everyone drive electric Yugo's, etc. etc.

Damn we can't even have a conversation here.

Muh rights!
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53599 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 10:41 pm to
quote:

Even at 100% efficiency, solar panels can't supply enough power to meet projected demand unless they cover enough usable land to make growing crops a dim prospect. Seriously, why do so many of you not do a little simple math before buying off on the promises of solar power, EVs, and the hundreds of others?


Wut?

Do you even know where fossil fuels come from and how the latent energy originated?

Assuming overall 10% efficiency (test designs of PV have pushed 50% already, and 20+% is currently possible with commercial designs), and using the average insolation of Colorado as a bench mark, you can power the entire country with a photovoltaic area of around twice that of Rhode Island.

You can stick that all in Texas and most would never see it. And the idea isn't to have it all in one place. Id be interested to see the math on solar tiles, because that is where the future is.

But GTFO with this crap that simple math isn't there for solar to be even a possibility. The energy is there. We just need to figure out how to tap it.

Will we ever be 100% solar? Probably not.

But in time the technology will allow for a sizable chunk of our consumption to be.

Edited out a little nugget of stupidity not relevant to the point.
This post was edited on 6/6/17 at 11:25 pm
Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
30763 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 10:46 pm to
quote:

The Union of Concerned Scientists



:rotflmao: :rotflmao:


I can only imagine the scams they have pulled in so called studies to get that Government grant $$$$$$$$$$$.

Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
72804 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 10:58 pm to
quote:

A 3 foot by 3 foot tile gets enough power to run your house


Posted by tigerinthebueche
Member since Oct 2010
38233 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 11:05 pm to
quote:

o the discussion on the future of alternative fueled automobiles is needed.


And we're having it. But from my perspective the green energy crowd always comes off as preachy like evangelicals. They aren't here for a discussion. They're here for a conversion. They want to present their argument, then I MUST agree with them and agree to alternative energy. I find them more offensive than effective at stating their case.
Again JMO. I'm sure they're not all like that. But that's how I perceive them.

Even if they're argument is irrefutable, I still reserve the right to not accept it and opt for fossil fuels. They don't seem to handle that well either.
Posted by TheDrunkenTigah
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
18356 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 11:08 pm to
quote:

For frick's sake, a 3 foot by 3 foot square on your roof gets enough power to run your entire house for six months....every day.


Yeah this little nugget right here is gonna need a link.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53599 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 11:24 pm to
Looking back, you are correct.

In the monthly value, I was translating electric bill in terms of watt hours....not kilowatt hours. Brain fart. Units I was comparing to was in kWh/m^2/day.

The rest of the post's math stands however.
Posted by ChunkyLover54
Member since Apr 2015
6670 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 11:30 pm to
Colorado/ Wyoming! frick yeah!
Posted by larry289
Holiday Island, AR
Member since Nov 2009
3858 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 11:35 pm to
Can I drive more than 60 miles while driving normally?
How much CO2 released into atmosphere to provide electrical charging stations?
How many charging stations would you need if each car had to be charged for 4 hours every 60-80 miles?
So you say use solar panels to power charging stations. What happens when the sun doesn't shine for 4-5 days?
Can I pull a trailer with a 1/2 ton worth of junk in it?
Do I have to replace $10,000 batteries every 3 years?

Maybe some of these have been improved over the last several years, but that's what I recall being the case 5=7 years ago.

351C in a 68 Mustang fastback with a 4 speed toploader, four barrel Holley, electronic ignition and 101 octane; end of discussion for me.

No the polar ice caps are not melting.

That about covers my thoughts.
Posted by MLCLyons
Member since Nov 2012
4793 posts
Posted on 6/7/17 at 10:40 am to
quote:

Link?

That rig alone would have to weigh 40,000 pounds



They aren't on the street yet, but they are soon from what I've read. It's actually a hydrogen powered electric motor.
https://nikolamotor.com/one

So we have Tesla and now Nikola motors haha.
Posted by Warfarer
Dothan, AL
Member since May 2010
12437 posts
Posted on 6/7/17 at 10:44 am to
By the rough looks of it, it seems as though the higher numbers coincide with areas that have more slow traffic and more people (more cars).
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
40176 posts
Posted on 6/7/17 at 10:50 am to
quote:

cheap
Perhaps the price you see is cheap, but it's far from clear that overall cost is "cheap".
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
22338 posts
Posted on 6/7/17 at 10:57 am to
That plant food sure is dangerous. CO2 has to go.
Posted by Tigeralum2008
Yankees Fan
Member since Apr 2012
17754 posts
Posted on 6/7/17 at 10:59 am to
quote:

No the polar ice caps are not melting







This post was edited on 6/7/17 at 11:01 am
Posted by Tigeralum2008
Yankees Fan
Member since Apr 2012
17754 posts
Posted on 6/7/17 at 11:05 am to
quote:

Do I have to replace $10,000 batteries every 3 years?


Tesla's batteries come with a 10 year warranty against failure.

Research shows the batteries still hold 90% of their charge after 130K miles



first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram