- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Do you really believe stories from the Bible?
Posted on 4/5/26 at 11:08 pm to tigerfan84
Posted on 4/5/26 at 11:08 pm to tigerfan84
quote:
Ron Wyatt is another one
Ron Wyatt is full of crap and his actions damage the credibility of Christianity
I say that as a mostly literal believer of scripture
Posted on 4/5/26 at 11:31 pm to MaxxPain2
do some digging on the Shroud
Posted on 4/5/26 at 11:34 pm to Twenty 49
quote:
Top 10 Longest Living People in the Bible Methuselah: 969 years Jared: 962 years Noah: 950 years Adam: 930 years Seth: 912 years Kenan (Cainan): 910 years Enos (Enosh): 905 years Mahalalel (Mahalaleel): 895 years Lamech: 777 years Enoch: 365 years (Enoch is included for his story, although he did not die, but was taken by God, as noted in Genesis 5:24)
I am a believer who doesn't just accept things bc they are in there, I think them through from a fairly critical viewpoint, and what gets me past this is the pre flood vs post flood changes to the atmosphere
Also I've read that the Sumerian Kings list had som people on there that lived to similarly absurdly old ages for whatever that is worth BUT I did not go out of my way to confirm that on my own
Also could just be as simple as something get lost in the changes in calendars, languages, cultures, etc over a super long period of time
This post was edited on 4/5/26 at 11:36 pm
Posted on 4/5/26 at 11:40 pm to OweO
quote:
The bible says Adam and Eve were the first humans right? God created them and those two people were responsible for populating planet earth. That means their kids had to breed with each other and genetically speaking would that even be possible?
Ahh yes my favorite, one of those who believes God is plenty powerful enough to create the entire universe out of thin air, no issue at all. But genetic defects from inbreeding, the same genetics that the person fully admits God created in the first place, is too high a hurdle for an all powerful God to overcome
Posted on 4/6/26 at 5:19 am to Ramblin Wreck
While you are speaking, the other person is formulating their next point, or, at best, formulating a reply to "prove" you wrong. Communication, it seems, should be easy, but in reality, it's almost impossible.
This post was edited on 4/6/26 at 5:20 am
Posted on 4/6/26 at 5:27 am to SOSFAN
quote:
Archeological dig after Archeological dig are confirming the Bible with every find.
When you people say things like this, what do you mean by it? Because I don’t think it’s true, and they certainly aren’t confirming any supernatural aspects of the Bible.
Posted on 4/6/26 at 5:29 am to ATrillionaire
quote:
Just checked. Still only seeing forbidden fruit. Looking for "not an apple" or fig or grape or something. Haven't found it yet though.
You must stop trying to be a crappy lawyer like SFP.
Posted on 4/6/26 at 5:31 am to MaxxPain2
Heres my issue. The one time in history God chooses to reveal himself through his son... he only does so in an area with a population of 60,000 people... with another 250 million people existing elsewhere.
Oh and all those other peoples religions are wrong and are going to hell of they dont accept jesus as their savior.
ETA. Also only 3-15% of the population in tge area could read or write, theres no possible way they were dumb enough to be fooled by anyone or anything
Oh and all those other peoples religions are wrong and are going to hell of they dont accept jesus as their savior.
ETA. Also only 3-15% of the population in tge area could read or write, theres no possible way they were dumb enough to be fooled by anyone or anything
This post was edited on 4/6/26 at 5:34 am
Posted on 4/6/26 at 5:33 am to Marciano1
Yes, next question. Also, if you don't believe today you will believe when you meet face to face.
Posted on 4/6/26 at 5:35 am to usmcnav
quote:
Also, if you don't believe today you will believe when you meet face to face.
How do you know? And why is it that you have such revenge fantasies about your religious beliefs?
Posted on 4/6/26 at 5:47 am to MaxxPain2
The one I hope never takes place is Revalations. Sounds like a terrible way to spend an afternoon.
Posted on 4/6/26 at 5:50 am to Koolazzkat
quote:
Revalations
No such book.
Posted on 4/6/26 at 6:26 am to MaxxPain2
It's called faith. Ever heard of it?
Posted on 4/6/26 at 7:37 am to SOSFAN
quote:
Archeological dig after Archeological dig are confirming the Bible with every find.
I don't think you want to use archeology to defend the veracity of the stories in the holy book of Judaism.
The more we uncover with archeology and DNA, the more it becomes clear that what we call the Israelites are nothing more than a splinter group of Canaanites who, over a few generations, morphed their religious pantheon into monotheism. There's even evidence that this group, as Israelites practicing Judaism (prior to it being reduced to writing, likely) still practiced polytheism for a time.
This view that confirming certain stories (the flood) or cities from the Bible proves the Bible ignores the cross-cultural references of the same events and cities. Being Canaanites, and being from the same region, this shared cultural and geographic history will have the same stories. The Canaanites that created their own monotheistic version of the Canaanite religion would clearly use the same references from the culture/region.
So, for an example, I believe some sort of major flood event occurred in the Mesopotamia or Levant region. That in no way proves Judaism correct, nor does it prove the other religions of the other cultures from the region that reference the same flood event correct. There was a shared memory passed down over time that was co-opted by later groups of the region. Finding evidence of these shared events does not prove (or disprove) any aspects of the shared cultures.
Posted on 4/6/26 at 7:40 am to Cosmo
quote:why is it so easy for so many to believe the New Testament miracles but then completely dismiss the Old Testament miracles? It’s the same God that performed both
Parting of red sea was prob very low tide.
Noahs ark didnt have 2 of every animal
Jesus’ miracles yes
Posted on 4/6/26 at 7:44 am to LakeSide Lovin
quote:
why is it so easy for so many to believe the New Testament miracles but then completely dismiss the Old Testament miracles?
One reason is the shared culture issues I referenced above.
Also the format is clearly written for a simpler people. By the time Jesus roamed the Levant (and I do think there was a man in Rome around 0AD who preached what became Christianity), we had a much more complex understanding of the world (being in the Roman times and all) and much stronger implements of society (like written language and the ability to spread ideas much more quickly). That's why most of the stories around Jesus are more believable as miracles and are much more tactile in nature.
There are no silly, childish things like a worldwide flood, Noah's ark, Jonah and the fish, Moses parting the Red Sea, 800+ year old people, etc. Those are the mythologies of a simpler people who did not understand the world like people of the Roman era.
Posted on 4/6/26 at 7:46 am to ATrillionaire
quote:well one family. There were 8 people on the ark
Isn't all pre-flood history passed on by one man, Noah?
Posted on 4/6/26 at 8:08 am to MaxxPain2
Believe what you want. All I can say is that I believe. If I am nothing happens. If you are wrong, you know.
Popular
Back to top


0






