Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Center of the Universe
Biography:Yeah, it's me.
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:13532
Registered on:9/19/2006
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
And when you're 80 and all alone you're gonna rethink that
quote:

They were warned and then took it and tried to rub it in everyone’s face.

Enjoy.


All of the millions of users that lost their eye sight and stomachs right, dimwit?
quote:

What about Hibachi?


What about it? That's Japanese
quote:

So you agree it’s bs now


No. I agree dimwits like you will think they are fake too.
quote:

Yeh idiot, cause radio signals can pass through the Van Allen Radiation belt.



Got a link?

So all these moon exploration missions being sent by India and China recently, and the Rovers on Mars , and the Voyager space probes are fake too right? I mean GMan the Radiation Belts!!!!

Fricking fool
WTF are you talking about? Nice link.
quote:

interesting that you're dancing around the question and already coming up with reasons why it may happen this time around

I'll ask again: 60+ years on from 9 flawless moon visits do you think we can do it even once without a major problem this time?



Idiot? Can you even read? I said no and I said why! DEI infests NASA.

And yes o f course we can. We did it 60 years ago several times. And where is your link saying why we can't ?

Thanks for posting this. showing it to the kids!
quote:

"The American people don't believe anything until they see it in TV" President Richard Nixon.

You are the idiot if you believe there was a phone call from the moon by the Astronauts to the President after the dune buggy ride.


It was transmitted by radio moron. explain to me one single reason why the moon landing was impossible. Oh , and provide a link please...
quote:

I'm just asking folks to go on record that 60 years later, do we think we can do that again successfully on our next attempt if and when?

If the next ship lands upside down killing the crew, can't blast off the moon successfully, misses the orbiting ship, runs out of gas, flies into the sun or implodes due to a leak will we just all shrug our shoulders and say "we were just that good those 9 other times"


Yeah that's logical. We may crash so there's no way they could not have crashed. :lol:

Besides ever since Obama infested NASA with DEI and Muslim out reach ordersl Probably will crash.
they don;t believe we landed on the Moon

re: Creatine-wow

Posted by TigerGman on 12/27/25 at 11:07 am to
quote:

I use both mono and hcl. Try it and see for yourself both are cheap.


I use Mono, what's the benefit of HCL? how much of each do you take?
quote:

This USSR argument is literally the dumbest point you guys have. Let’s ignore the fvcking moon rocks we have and bring up some dumb elementary level hypothetical.


You think the same fools that deny it happened are gonna believe a piece of rock that's on display is from the moon?
A long time and highly respected surgeon, has been telling me horor stories of DEI unqualified admissions, med school training and DEI hand holding, social promotion preferences infesting med schools . We should all damn well be concerned.
quote:

It's just like using any non-apple computer.

Well, it's obvious then that you haven't tried to use Win 11
Not so sure, she's probably trying to lull you into a false since of securty. In my mind you should be suspicious
quote:

I used to think that the flat earthers and moon landing deniers just liked to go down the rabbit holes as a weird sort of hobby but didn’t actually believe it.

It appears I was wrong.


Which is exaclty why I started this thread. Hopefully if enough denying idiots on here are exposed for how ridiculous they are, other deniers will at least start to see the light.
quote:

iOS isn't intuitive at all.
This can't be said often enough.


And Android is? I have both and it's just a matter of getting used to each system
Section111 row V 1,2,3

E Transfer

tigergman@gmail.com

quote:

With that said, what’s to gain from it? Prestige points at best. They wouldn’t gain any economic or military leverage. Meanwhile, the USSR had bigger priorities to focus on and couldn’t risk a failed campaign backfiring on its own credibility too.

As you can see, the risk to reward ratio wasn’t worth the effort at all. I am sorry that the world isn’t grounded by one dimensional emotional Hollywood logic like you thought.

As I can see? I'll tell what I can see--you are clueless dumbass who knows nothing about the cold war tensions at the time that led to the Space race to begiin with. "Prestige points" ? LMFAO. you need a better AI search program if that's the best rebuttal point it came back with!
You cannot even grasp the simple concept that exposing the US was lying about the moon landing would have been a massive propoganda coup at the time.
The best reasoning you can come up with is that Russians would have exposed themselves as they were lying to the world about trying to get there too. :lol: :lol:
Holy chit, thanks for making my Chirstmas !!!

quote:

The technology to do this and provide an argument strong enough to be compelling didn’t exist until 2009. Again, the world isn’t a Hollywood Superman movie.


Wait. Are you saying we didn't have adequate communication technolgy/equipment to reach the Moon and back until 2009? Got a link? :lol: :lol: :lol: