- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Deepfakes drama on YouTube/twitch
Posted on 1/31/23 at 8:47 am to Jon Ham
Posted on 1/31/23 at 8:47 am to Jon Ham
quote:
By the time something like that happened to me it would be happening to a ton of people and it wouldn’t be a “big deal” anymore.
These internet “celebrities” are just on the cutting edge of this. Their attractiveness and popularity has allowed them a great and profitable life, but they have put themselves in the cross hairs for this type of activity. To me it’s like “yeah, that sucks, but it sort of comes with the territory now.” Fake celeb nudes have been around forever, it’s just that the technology has gotten much better.
Here you've reiterated that you can't put yourself in their shoes, and you've sprinkled in some victim blaming. "I can't relate to your plight but I'm sure it's your fault."
1
Posted on 1/31/23 at 8:47 am to Jon Ham
Who are the three streamers involved?
Posted on 1/31/23 at 8:49 am to Jon Ham
May someone please translate for someone who lived during Commodore 64 what this post even means?
Posted on 1/31/23 at 8:50 am to CocomoLSU
quote:
We think politics are stupid now, just wait until there are fake DWI videos out there of opponents.
Blockchain technology should be able to mitigate this. Blockchains essentially allow for a public record “chain of custody” where you will be able to trace where the video came from.
Posted on 1/31/23 at 8:51 am to Jon Ham
quote:That's not how it works.
Blockchain technology should be able to mitigate this. Blockchains essentially allow for a public record “chain of custody” where you will be able to trace where the video came from.
Posted on 1/31/23 at 8:52 am to Turf Taint
quote:frick now GenX is tech illiterate?
May someone please translate for someone who lived during Commodore 64 what this post even means?
Posted on 1/31/23 at 8:53 am to Jon Ham
quote:
There’s some drama on YouTube/twitch about a streamer getting caught on stream looking at purchased deep fakes of two of his friends (girls) who are also streamers.
You think the drama is bad now? Just wait until this hits politics.
Posted on 1/31/23 at 8:54 am to Korkstand
quote:
you've sprinkled in some victim blaming. "I can't relate to your plight but I'm sure it's your fault."
Recognizing the reality that hugely popular and attractive women are likely to have fakes out there is not blaming them. Try using logic instead of buzz words next time.
Posted on 1/31/23 at 8:55 am to Korkstand
quote:
That's not how it works.
What do you mean?
Posted on 1/31/23 at 8:56 am to Bard
People are boomering it up in this thread but you're right. We're entering dangerous territory of AI. It's getting to the point where incredibly realistic video and audio can be faked. It's going to become a problem. Imagine someone who doesn't like you hires someone online to make a video of you using racial slurs to get you fired. How you gonna defend that?
Posted on 1/31/23 at 8:56 am to Turf Taint
quote:
May someone please translate for someone who lived during Commodore 64 what this post even means?
Pretend you can watch a porn but instead of the porn star you can watch your buddy's hot wife in it instead. She wouldn't actually be in it obviously, but her face would be superimposed into it and onto the porn star's body so seamlessly that it literally looks like the wife is in the porn.
That's what's happening here.
Posted on 1/31/23 at 8:56 am to Korkstand
quote:
What if there was a deepfake of you sucking a dick?
In OP’s case, it wouldn’t be a deepfake
Posted on 1/31/23 at 8:57 am to Jon Ham
quote:We all recognize the reality, but you seem to be arguing that because it is reality that no one should care.
Recognizing the reality that hugely popular and attractive women are likely to have fakes out there is not blaming them. Try using logic instead of buzz words next time.
Posted on 1/31/23 at 8:57 am to Bard
There needs to be laws around the use of deep fakes because if you think “fake news” and disinformation is bad now imagine when one side thinks Hillary is killing babies or Trump is selling nuclear codes to Putin all on film.
How about creating a deep fake of a spouse cheating to aid a divorce proceeding?
Set aside the ethics, the potential consequences of deep fakes are catastrophic.
How about creating a deep fake of a spouse cheating to aid a divorce proceeding?
Set aside the ethics, the potential consequences of deep fakes are catastrophic.
Posted on 1/31/23 at 8:58 am to Jon Ham
quote:
But what I’m not getting is this girl and others acting like this is some huge assault on them personally.
Bruh, let me make a deepfake porn of your wife or daughter and distribute it to your male coworkers.
Posted on 1/31/23 at 9:02 am to Jon Ham
quote:For one thing every department in the world would have to start using blockchains to prove authenticity. Also this is not much different than a spokesperson coming out and saying "this is authentic", so what's the point? Arrests are public record anyway, right?
What do you mean?
Second, the media data itself isn't stored on the chain or protected in any way, so copies will be freely distributed regardless. So everyone would have to be in the habit of verifying facts before sharing and shaping public opinion. We can do this without blockchains, but we don't.
Posted on 1/31/23 at 9:02 am to Korkstand
quote:
We all recognize the reality, but you seem to be arguing that because it is reality that no one should care.
I haven’t argued that at all. Try again to engage in honest discussion without mischaracterizing my words.
Posted on 1/31/23 at 9:04 am to Jon Ham
quote:Then what is this thread about?
I haven’t argued that at all. Try again to engage in honest discussion without mischaracterizing my words.
Posted on 1/31/23 at 9:05 am to Korkstand
quote:
For one thing every department in the world would have to start using blockchains to prove authenticity.
Blockchains will likely end up being the base layer of the internet (Web3). Once it get incorporated, it won’t be much different than how things are now.
Posted on 1/31/23 at 9:05 am to Korkstand
quote:
Then what is this thread about?
Is the level of outrage proportional to the situation?
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News