- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/13/20 at 12:11 pm to LNCHBOX
The difficult part about this is everyone is "right":
Group 1: Social distancing worked! There are so few cases because society has done a great job adapting to what the government has asked.
Group 2: This virus is a joke! So few people are infected. Time to get back to work. The experts were wrong. Open up the economy!
Both groups can use "few people are infected" to their benefit ...
Group 1: Social distancing worked! There are so few cases because society has done a great job adapting to what the government has asked.
Group 2: This virus is a joke! So few people are infected. Time to get back to work. The experts were wrong. Open up the economy!
Both groups can use "few people are infected" to their benefit ...
Posted on 4/13/20 at 12:11 pm to LNCHBOX
The. Old. People. Who. Get. This. And. Die. Would. Have. Died. Anyway.
How can you not see that is the point I’m trying to make?! We haven’t reached capacity anywhere. They got care and still died. They will get care and still die.
The whole point was simply to delay their deaths so they didn’t clog up the system at once. Did that save other people? Sure. I’ve NEVER claimed it didn’t. But that number is way overblown. And it wasn’t done for the sake of the old people who get this. It was for all the other people who would need ICU and vents.
How can you not see that is the point I’m trying to make?! We haven’t reached capacity anywhere. They got care and still died. They will get care and still die.
The whole point was simply to delay their deaths so they didn’t clog up the system at once. Did that save other people? Sure. I’ve NEVER claimed it didn’t. But that number is way overblown. And it wasn’t done for the sake of the old people who get this. It was for all the other people who would need ICU and vents.
Posted on 4/13/20 at 12:12 pm to ell_13
quote:
The. Old. People. Who. Get. This. And. Die. Would. Have. Died. Anyway.
Just because you think this does not make it a fact.
quote:
How can you not see that is the point I’m trying to make?!
Because you repeating it a millions times doesn't make it so.
Posted on 4/13/20 at 12:12 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
quote:Yep. Said this a month ago before we knew how this would shake out. Said the numbers will be way lower than predictions so that everyone is right and everyone can be wrong at the same time.
The difficult part about this is everyone is "right":
Posted on 4/13/20 at 12:12 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
Except the second group is basing their opinion on the projections that INCLUDED social isolation.
This post was edited on 4/13/20 at 12:14 pm
Posted on 4/13/20 at 12:13 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
quote:hijack:
GeorgeTheGreek
You still working down in SoCal?
Posted on 4/13/20 at 12:14 pm to Rep520
quote:
Not just "Jesus take the wheel," and I'm Christian. God helps those who make smart decisions to help themselves.
quote:
A fellow was stuck on his rooftop in a flood. He was praying to God for help.
Soon a man in a rowboat came by and the fellow shouted to the man on the roof, "Jump in, I can save you."
The stranded fellow shouted back, "No, it's OK, I'm praying to God and he is going to save me."
So the rowboat went on.
Then a motorboat came by. "The fellow in the motorboat shouted, "Jump in, I can save you."
To this the stranded man said, "No thanks, I'm praying to God and he is going to save me. I have faith."
So the motorboat went on.
Then a helicopter came by and the pilot shouted down, "Grab this rope and I will lift you to safety."
To this the stranded man again replied, "No thanks, I'm praying to God and he is going to save me. I have faith."
So the helicopter reluctantly flew away.
Soon the water rose above the rooftop and the man drowned. He went to Heaven. He finally got his chance to discuss this whole situation with God, at which point he exclaimed, "I had faith in you but you didn't save me, you let me drown. I don't understand why!"
To this God replied, "I sent you a rowboat and a motorboat and a helicopter, what more did you expect?"
Posted on 4/13/20 at 12:14 pm to cable
quote:At the same time, the first group is basing the initial estimations of hundreds of thousands dead on predictions that INCLUDED social isolation as well.
Except the second group is basing their opinion on the projection that INCLUDED social isolation.
The OP is an example of that.
I don't really think it is up for debate at this point that the initial models were based on extremely bad data, which is why they were so extreme.
What I was trying to state, before this thread turned into a walk down memory lane, is that research shows that social distancing measures have, at the most, around a 30% impact on numbers.
We were seeing 40+% in many regions and even 90% reduction in Alabama.
Yes, social distancing has had an impact, and anyone saying otherwise is an idiot, but the initial predictions were bad.
Very bad.
Scruffy-level bad.
This post was edited on 4/13/20 at 12:21 pm
Posted on 4/13/20 at 12:15 pm to Volvagia
quote:
100% napkin math, with the assumptions I put in the post. So if people who are actually experts applying thought out models are saying 60k, take their word for it.
Posted on 4/13/20 at 12:18 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:It’s a fact that the 80 year old who died 5 weeks ago would have died today had they gotten it 5 weeks later. That’s my point. It goes for anyone who has died of it actually. We haven’t reached any capacity anywhere for that not to be a fact. And the treatment hasn’t changed either. When Salmon and I had this discussion, we agreed that the only true difference would be the possibility of a proven treatment months and months down the road. But that was almost irrelevant because this spread won’t be stopped between now and then and the country will open back up before then cause spikes and spread.
Just because you think this does not make it a fact.
The old people are the worst offenders of this quarantine too btw. And I don’t blame them. Why go months and months without seeing family and friends only to get it anyway and then be locked in a hospital alone with the possibility of dying without seeing your kids and grandkids for the last 3 months or more as you waste away. Sad fricking shite.
Posted on 4/13/20 at 12:20 pm to ell_13
quote:
It’s a fact
Not much point in this. You throw this word around with absolutely no understanding of its actual meaning.
Posted on 4/13/20 at 12:21 pm to LNCHBOX
You are the fricking king of strawmans. 
Posted on 4/13/20 at 12:21 pm to ell_13
quote:
You are the fricking king ofquote:.
strawmans
Another word you seem to not get
Posted on 4/13/20 at 12:23 pm to LNCHBOX
You take every point I make and change it into some hyperbolic extreme and debate that instead of what I actually say. Now you know what it means.
That lesson was free.
That lesson was free.
Posted on 4/13/20 at 12:23 pm to ell_13
quote:
change it into some hyperbolic extreme
So you didn't say that grandma would die regardless of availability of ICU care?
Posted on 4/13/20 at 12:26 pm to LNCHBOX
Do you ever shut the frick up
You are not nearly as smart as you think you are.
You are not nearly as smart as you think you are.
Posted on 4/13/20 at 12:32 pm to LNCHBOX
I clarified that point.
What I didn’t say and you chose to argue against:
“... easing stress on our healthcare system won't save anyone.”
“It's not an automatic death sentence for the old no matter how much you wish it to be so.”
“Regardless of care”
Those are strawmans. I’ve said multiple times now keeping hospitals under capacity was the goal and it does save lives just not mainly the ones people think it does. Ive never once said that covid was a death sentence for the old. And I certainly don’t wish that since I’ve been saying they should be quarantined for a month. And of course care matters. It’s not a matter of zero hospital available with no care at all vs a billion vents and icu beds. Again, I clarified my point in a previous post regarding this.
I made this post not for your benefit. You’ll ignore the points, of course. I mean, you chose to argue against the strawmans to begin with so why wouldn’t you now? It’s more for others who think anything you’ve claimed I’ve said is true. Have a nice day.
What I didn’t say and you chose to argue against:
“... easing stress on our healthcare system won't save anyone.”
“It's not an automatic death sentence for the old no matter how much you wish it to be so.”
“Regardless of care”
Those are strawmans. I’ve said multiple times now keeping hospitals under capacity was the goal and it does save lives just not mainly the ones people think it does. Ive never once said that covid was a death sentence for the old. And I certainly don’t wish that since I’ve been saying they should be quarantined for a month. And of course care matters. It’s not a matter of zero hospital available with no care at all vs a billion vents and icu beds. Again, I clarified my point in a previous post regarding this.
I made this post not for your benefit. You’ll ignore the points, of course. I mean, you chose to argue against the strawmans to begin with so why wouldn’t you now? It’s more for others who think anything you’ve claimed I’ve said is true. Have a nice day.
Posted on 4/13/20 at 12:36 pm to ell_13
quote:
I clarified that point.
Clarified it by stating that the old people will die regardless. Your exact words
quote:
The. Old. People. Who. Get. This. And. Die. Would. Have. Died. Anyway.
That's not a fact no matter how many times you repeat it. Your position on this virus from the beginning has been well documented. You got it wrong.
Posted on 4/13/20 at 12:40 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
Ezekiel Emmanuel
Now THAT'S what I call a biblical name.
Popular
Back to top



0





