
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/1/26 at 10:41 am to CAD703X
quote:
you don't think that digital signature could be traced back to you and then they decide your politics or requests don't meet "community standards" then the next thing you know you've been debanked and turned down for ride shares by Uber. But keep that head in the sand. This is just used to keep college kids from cheating on their essays.
It literally says in the OP that there is no user identifying information. That could change, or it could be a lie, but there’s nothing in the OP I’m particularly concerned about. Frankly, the fact that they are announcing this publicly is going to reduce demand for their product.
Posted on 11/1/26 at 1:49 pm to Jwodie
I know a guy. Owns a company. He used chatgpt to write his employee handbook. The a-hole legit copy pasted word for word what chat gpt wrote. Even the part where it said, "take this section out. Only for management". Also had a section in there about not using AI for personal info. What did he tell all his employees to do? Sync their email and cloud storage, which contained all their customer info, with chatgpt.
He's now getting sued into oblivion by an employee he fired who knew all of this, pointed it out, and it pissed the owner off so he fired the guy.
To me this a good thing. frick these guys that think AI is some fairy godmother that can solve all your problems in a chat window.
He's now getting sued into oblivion by an employee he fired who knew all of this, pointed it out, and it pissed the owner off so he fired the guy.
To me this a good thing. frick these guys that think AI is some fairy godmother that can solve all your problems in a chat window.
Posted on 11/1/26 at 2:31 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
that text will be identifiable as generated by Claude if you run it through an algorithm that Anthropic is providing to certain entities
This is the problem I have. "Certain entities."
Posted on 11/1/26 at 2:32 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
When Claude generates text, it’s going to do so in a way that the combination of characters in that text will be identifiable as generated by Claude if you run it through an algorithm that Anthropic is providing to certain entities for the purpose of determining whether a given text is AI generated.
You're not wrong to worry about AI watermarks -- it is a serious concern.
It's not just an AI detection, it's checking about the sincerity of the person writing the message.
I would say you are absolutely right.
Posted on 11/1/26 at 2:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Not this system
Sure you can. You just have to paraphrase the product in your own words. It’s not like a hidden digital tag. It’ll be like tracking patterns of how many syllables and letters words have and their frequency. The algorithm will adjust its output to meet those parameters.
Posted on 11/1/26 at 2:45 pm to Jwodie
This seems like it will take a bite out of their business.
I get where they are going, ownership of everything it produces, but a lot of people are going to switch to a competitor.
I get where they are going, ownership of everything it produces, but a lot of people are going to switch to a competitor.
Posted on 11/1/26 at 5:13 pm to Jwodie
I honestly thought AI already did this. I’m surprised it took this long.
Posted on 11/1/26 at 5:44 pm to CAD703X
So let me get this straight.. people keep saying that AI is going to end the world but then when they put up safeguards, you people bitch that we are so fricked
Make up your fricking minds
Make up your fricking minds
Posted on 11/1/26 at 5:55 pm to GetMeOutOfHere
quote:
You're not wrong to worry about AI watermarks -- it is a serious concern.
It's not just an AI detection, it's checking about the sincerity of the person writing the message.
I would say you are absolutely right.
He is justified to push back.
It's not paranoia. It's the right thing to do.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 8:52 am to Joshjrn
quote:
literally says in the OP that there is no user identifying information.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 8:57 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:lawfare doesn't exist.
Holy
fricking
shite
Nobody was debanked for supporting Trump in 2020
Parents weren't put on FBI watch lists for showing up at school board meetings to protest perverts using girls bathrooms.
January 6 was worse than 911 and Pearl Harbor combined.
Enjoy your AI UUIDs tracking everything you've ever had their help on, corporations would never share that info to help governments track your digital footprint.
This post was edited on 11/2/26 at 9:05 am
Posted on 11/2/26 at 9:49 am to CAD703X
quote:
CAD703X
I’m not exactly one to buy into corporate bullshite, but it does elicit the question of why they would offer this information sua sponte and then lie about how the algorithm works. They could have just, you know, not told you
Posted on 11/2/26 at 10:28 am to Jwodie
lol, people will have a way to remove this watermark within a week of rollout
Posted on 11/2/26 at 11:26 am to Joshjrn
quote:
How is AI outing its work product as AI an example of AI imposing its will on us?
Just my educated guess, but this is what I think:
1 - they will use this to try to expose competitors that are stealing their product.
2 - if you use their product and are monetizing your work, they can claim a portion of the profits if you don't have a specific type of licensing arrangement with them.
Think of it this way: suppose you write a book that you sell on-line in Adobe Acrobat format, and Adobe came along and sued you for a percentage of the profit you make on the book.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 3:37 pm to Jwodie
Does this mean kids will have to do their own homework?
Posted on 11/2/26 at 3:51 pm to Stinger_1066
It will be just the opposite. As already stated, you can’t copyright AI created work.
Practically all original thought has already been scraped from the web. This will allow Claude to skip AI generated content it already created and focus on stealing whatever original thought is left. It will probably also be able to filter competitors AI generated information to reverse engineer it.
Practically all original thought has already been scraped from the web. This will allow Claude to skip AI generated content it already created and focus on stealing whatever original thought is left. It will probably also be able to filter competitors AI generated information to reverse engineer it.

Popular
Back to top



0












