Started By
Message

re: CDC: 38% of coronavirus hospitalizations are age 20-54

Posted on 3/19/20 at 7:26 am to
Posted by Big4SALTbro
Member since Jun 2019
25246 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 7:26 am to
even the CDC could smear numbers for a report. if they put it in an excel and just sent out raw numbers that would be great.


Posted by UnluckyTiger
Member since Sep 2003
43701 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 7:28 am to
And 99% percent of that 38% percent is 50-54 probably
Posted by Big4SALTbro
Member since Jun 2019
25246 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 7:28 am to
it should be more like 18- 30, 31-40, 41-54, 55-65, 65 older

then we would have some nice data, then we need to know what conditions were underlying. Its possible the 38 percent are mostly people with bad immune systems due to any number of conditions. Perhaps conditions that if we weren't in such prospers times wouldn't have made it through the gene pool.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24485 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 7:29 am to
99% of those getting sick are between 0-89 years old
Posted by LarryDavid
Los Angeles
Member since Sep 2010
4207 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 7:29 am to
Surprise!
Posted by Big4SALTbro
Member since Jun 2019
25246 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 7:30 am to
That is highly likely as well, and the remains 1% would be people with cancer, and other issues that compromise their immune systems.


its amazing what you can do with data when you want
Posted by chitiger91
Lake Bluff IL
Member since Apr 2016
3120 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 7:31 am to
It’s disgusting what the media is doing to our people. I have always thought we had a somewhat educated prideful nation but that’s not the case. Any headline from ANY new source (from the onion to CNN) and they jump in their car and buy up all the TP. Terrible sad times we live in.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53610 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 7:32 am to
quote:

Wtf kind of age range is 20-54


I’m assuming it was picked because statistically they were similar. Your odds at 50 aren’t much different at 20 all things being equal.

They are saying that once you hit 55, that’s when mortality starts to slide upward sharply.

Which is nothing new, which makes calling it an agenda kinda hilarious
This post was edited on 3/19/20 at 7:33 am
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
69738 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 7:32 am to
quote:

And 99% percent of that 38% percent is 50-54 probably


If you bothered to read one sentence further you would have seen this:

quote:

About 20 percent of patients, including those in intensive care, were between 20 to 44,
Posted by Kennerkarl
Kenner
Member since Jan 2014
711 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 7:32 am to
Another way to put it:
There are only 101 people aged 20-44 in the entire country that are hospitalized from the coronovirus, of those it is not clear how many have underlying health conditions.

No so bad.
Posted by Giantkiller
the internet.
Member since Sep 2007
25835 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 7:35 am to
quote:

Killing. Not affecting. Killing. It’s only killing the majority of elderly and people with preexisting conditions. No one ever said it only infects old people.
quote:

What’s the age range for the other 62%



This is kind of my beef with the media as well. Publishing shite like this, in a manner where you just take numbers to skew your headline, is why I'm having a hard time trusting the mass media right now.
Posted by 13SaintTiger
Isle of Capri
Member since Sep 2011
18419 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 7:35 am to
quote:

I’m assuming it was picked because statistically they were similar.


Wtf are the similarities between a 20 year old and 54 year old. That’s 3 generations between that age group
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
60182 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 7:35 am to
Stop trying to scare us boomer
Posted by UnluckyTiger
Member since Sep 2003
43701 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 7:36 am to
How much of that 20% is lower than 40? These stats suck
This post was edited on 3/19/20 at 7:37 am
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
64599 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 7:36 am to
quote:

a NYT article behind a pay wall.



The NYT has removed their pay wall for coronavirus information.
Posted by PiscesTiger
Concrete, WA
Member since Feb 2004
53696 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 7:37 am to
quote:

Pirate King



The will Wade threads need you there. Please report to the Rant.
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
69738 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 7:37 am to
quote:

Oh so I wasn’t far off 80% of the 38% is 44-54


No. 20% of the overall patients are between 20-44, not the 38%.
Posted by UnluckyTiger
Member since Sep 2003
43701 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 7:37 am to
Yeah I found my mistake
Posted by Chef Free Gold Bloom
Wherever I’m needed
Member since Dec 2019
1364 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 7:38 am to
quote:

The CDC isn’t putting out fake numbers.


China bullied or bribed the who and cdc to ignore this for months and now you want to trust them?
Posted by Big4SALTbro
Member since Jun 2019
25246 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 7:41 am to
I think that is a by product of our life styles. We have so much access to information that only certain headlines will catch attention. Then we have so many headlines we can read that only so much of the body of an article can be read. I believe very rarely does anyone actually read a non work article fully.

So you get a click, which generates ad revenue, by saying 1 dead from China flu. Someone reads the first paragraph and moves on. They don't read the end that says the guy was 90, or 54 with COPD.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram