- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Boeing 737 Max - Designed by Clowns
Posted on 1/10/20 at 9:39 pm to GeauxTigers80
Posted on 1/10/20 at 9:39 pm to GeauxTigers80
Have you read the absolute bullshite that he posts here on what seems to be a regular basis?
If you truly want to hear his take on anything, then you may be the only one!
Posted on 1/10/20 at 9:50 pm to EA6B
quote:
The project manager for the “fly by wire” software for several Boeing planes was a female LSU engineering graduate. One of her engineering professors was so concerned by the apparent gap between her ability to do the class work and understand it’s real world applications that he gave her a copy of the book “How Things Work” and suggested she find a job ipom graduation in something other than engineering.
It’s info like this, true or not, which keeps me coming back to TD.
Posted on 1/10/20 at 10:28 pm to Strannix
quote:
That’s why we’ve set bold goals in these areas, and they’re making a difference.”
Posted on 1/10/20 at 10:33 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
And yet US pilots don't seem to have a huge issue with them. I think I'd trust the people that have to fly them.
Over engineers and those that are actually building them? Are you dumb? Would you say that about any other driver of a vehicle in any other sector?
This post was edited on 1/10/20 at 10:34 pm
Posted on 1/10/20 at 10:37 pm to Sentrius
You say bean counters but what you really mean are short term investors on Wall Street demanding quarter after quarter increased profits, even if the investments that resulted in decreasing profits for the short term will result in massive profits in the long term.
Posted on 1/10/20 at 10:42 pm to gthog61
quote:The MAX problems have absolutely nothing to do with diversity or "suboptimal" hiring. The engineers at Boeing are qualified to design planes that fly, and fly well.
Every suboptimal hiring decision to “diversify” has to do with this.
The problems with the MAX are 100% about cutting corners, saving money by not wanting to get a new plane certified, and regulatory capture.
The larger MAX engines shouldn't have been put on the 737, but it's a pain in the arse, and expensive, to get a new plane in the air and retrain a bunch of pilots. So Boeing put the engines on the 737 anyway. The engineers knew it was a bad idea.
frick you and your racist/sexist assumptions.
Posted on 1/10/20 at 11:12 pm to kywildcatfanone
Boeing brought in some business consultants and then some new management to do a bunch of cost-cutting.
Stock prices tripled, so that race-to-the-bottom culture sure paid off.
Stock prices tripled, so that race-to-the-bottom culture sure paid off.
Posted on 1/10/20 at 11:25 pm to 777Tiger
quote:
ETA: see UAL232
Like all US pilots would have the same outcome in that situation.
Posted on 1/10/20 at 11:28 pm to Korkstand
quote:
The engineers knew it was a bad idea.
So why didn't all these qualified engineers say something?
Boeing has been at the vanguard of diversity for the sake of diversity for some time.
How much Boeing's long-standing emphasis on diversity (from their "wheel of diversity" 25 years ago to diversity being front and center in their values today) contributed directly to the 737 Max trainwreck who knows.
But what it has done is it has shifted their culture from one that promoted excellence in craftsmanship to a harmful emphasis on diversity of form which in turn has led to a culture of non-transparency.
FTR, voicing dissent at diversity of form is neither sexist nor racist.
Posted on 1/11/20 at 12:03 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
And yet US pilots don't seem to have a huge issue with them
Uhh, think again
Posted on 1/11/20 at 12:04 am to AlwysATgr
quote:You think they didn't? Regardless, nobody had to speak up. It was known from the top down how stupid an idea it was to put those engines on the 737. The simple fact that software had to be written to prevent stalls lays out how obviously terrible this decision was.
So why didn't all these qualified engineers say something?
Boeing was originally going to design a new plane with larger engines. But when they realized that would take too long and Airbus was going to kill them, they went ahead with this plan that they knew was stupid from the get-go.
quote:If you think for one second that Boeing, or any company, promotes diversity for the sake of diversity (rather than the bottom line), then you are out of your mind.
Boeing has been at the vanguard of diversity for the sake of diversity for some time.
quote::raiseshand: I know! Precisely zero impact.
How much Boeing's long-standing emphasis on diversity (from their "wheel of diversity" 25 years ago to diversity being front and center in their values today) contributed directly to the 737 Max trainwreck who knows.
quote:
But what it has done is it has shifted their culture from one that promoted excellence in craftsmanship to a harmful emphasis on diversity of form which in turn has led to a culture of non-transparency.
quote:Well, FTR, gthog61 did not simply voice dissent at "diversity of form". He blamed the diverse hiring decisions for the crashes. Not the decision to put too-big engines on too-small planes. Not the decision to skip adequate pilot training by making the claim that the MAX flies just like a regular 737. Not the numerous decisions that resulted in a regulatory environment where the manufacturers certify their own planes. Not all of these bone-headed decisions that really made the plane unsafe to fly. No, he blames the decision to hire women and non-whites.
FTR, voicing dissent at diversity of form is neither sexist nor racist.
That's well beyond dissent. That's well beyond logic.
Posted on 1/11/20 at 12:13 am to kywildcatfanone
The most telling goute for me was the below
MF'ers you regret the content of the messages? Not we regret putting people in danger, not we regret killing people, not we regret misleading the FAA, you regret the content got out? WTF
That is perhaps the most tone deaf PC nonsense I have ever seen.
quote:
“We regret the content of these communications, and apologize to the F.A.A., Congress, our airline customers and to the flying public for them,”
MF'ers you regret the content of the messages? Not we regret putting people in danger, not we regret killing people, not we regret misleading the FAA, you regret the content got out? WTF
That is perhaps the most tone deaf PC nonsense I have ever seen.
Posted on 1/11/20 at 12:17 am to EA6B
quote:
The project manager for the “fly by wire” software for several Boeing planes was a female LSU engineering graduate. One of her engineering professors was so concerned by the apparent gap between her ability to do the class work and understand it’s real world applications that he gave her a copy of the book “How Things Work” and suggested she find a job ipom graduation in something other than engineering.
Well she did. She found a job in project management.
Posted on 1/11/20 at 12:30 am to kywildcatfanone
I saw an interview on CNBC a couple of weeks ago, I can't remember for the life of me who it was though. Anyways, they stated that Boeing used to have a bunch of engineers on their board and as higher ups as well. He said now it's all businessmen who don't know anything about the actual engineering and manufacturing of the planes. He said it's been a more recent trend over the last 10 or so years and since they started doing that, they've come in to more problems with their products. Made since the way he broke everything down and how when that started happening, they started having more issues.
Posted on 1/11/20 at 1:28 am to Athos
quote:
Boeing went cheap. Instead of designing a new plane, they slapped awkward arse engines on an old model out of Airbus fear.
This. A fresh cut design should have been underway to succeed the 737NG line. Instead, the Dreamliner was top priority.
Posted on 1/11/20 at 11:23 am to LordSaintly
quote:
I’m against racial quotas, but we don’t know for a fact that female and minority incompetence is to blame here, nor do we know that the system was designed by them either.
I didn’t say they did, I just told you what Boeing’s focus per their own CEO. Which is not hiring white men.
Posted on 1/11/20 at 11:36 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
And yet US pilots don't seem to have a huge issue with them. I think I'd trust the people that have to fly them.
Don’t speak about shite you know nothing off. Pilots were furious over this plane
This post was edited on 1/11/20 at 11:42 am
Posted on 1/11/20 at 11:37 am to kywildcatfanone
I flew on one of those to Punta Cana, could have been me.
This post was edited on 1/11/20 at 11:40 am
Posted on 1/11/20 at 11:56 am to Korkstand
quote:
The MAX problems have absolutely nothing to do with diversity or "suboptimal" hiring. The engineers at Boeing are qualified to design planes that fly, and fly well.
Except they didn’t and don’t so that’s a little problem with your meltdown.
quote:
frick you and your racist/sexist assumptions.
Looks like Boeing is the one making decisions on race and sex instead of merit, whether or not that is biting them in the arse we don’t know. What we do know is they designed a plane that doesn’t fly too good. Spin it how you want.
This post was edited on 1/11/20 at 12:16 pm
Posted on 1/11/20 at 12:13 pm to Korkstand
quote:Meh. Diversity is fricking retarded.
frick you and your racist/sexist assumptions.
Popular
Back to top


0










