- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Attempt for Birmingham to annex all of Jefferson County
Posted on 6/2/26 at 4:14 pm
Posted on 6/2/26 at 4:14 pm
This won’t be interesting to most people on this board. There was a One Great City plan pushed in the early 1970’s to combine all the city governments in Birmingham. This wasn’t the first or last push to incorporate suburbs into the city’s control. Earlier in the century, Birmingham successfully took in Ensley, East Lake, Avondale, the Highlands area and others.
The campaign, which went public in 1970, was led by attorney David Vann along with business leaders Richard Pizitz, Norman Pless, Donald Brabston and Jim White. The Birmingham Chamber of Commerce and other business groups endorsed the proposal and polls indicated that as much as 65% of Over the Mountain residents favored consolidation, with weaker, but still favorable support in the northern suburbs. Among the plan's opponents were the Jefferson County Mayors Association.
The proposal to hold a county-wide referendum was allowed to die in committee in the Alabama State Senate during the 1971 Alabama legislative session. Had it succeeded, the campaign would have resulted in a much larger city, one that reached "from Lake Purdy to Port Birmingham, and from Graysville and Gardendale to the Cahaba River."
Could you imagine the City of Birmingham controlling Mountain Brook, Homewood, Vestavia Hills, Hoover, Trussville, etc.? It seems odd that the OTM areas would have polled at 65% being in favor of it. The unadvertised push was to help prevent the Birmingham government from being controlled by black residents, but it was being sold as an attempt to consolidate services and save money.
Cities like Nashville have a county wide city controlled government and have tried to encourage other cities to adopt the same system. I enjoy the suburb model where I feel like I have greater control. The Baton Rouge and St George fight is an example of a metro area pushing for the opposite of the Nashville model.
The campaign, which went public in 1970, was led by attorney David Vann along with business leaders Richard Pizitz, Norman Pless, Donald Brabston and Jim White. The Birmingham Chamber of Commerce and other business groups endorsed the proposal and polls indicated that as much as 65% of Over the Mountain residents favored consolidation, with weaker, but still favorable support in the northern suburbs. Among the plan's opponents were the Jefferson County Mayors Association.
The proposal to hold a county-wide referendum was allowed to die in committee in the Alabama State Senate during the 1971 Alabama legislative session. Had it succeeded, the campaign would have resulted in a much larger city, one that reached "from Lake Purdy to Port Birmingham, and from Graysville and Gardendale to the Cahaba River."
Could you imagine the City of Birmingham controlling Mountain Brook, Homewood, Vestavia Hills, Hoover, Trussville, etc.? It seems odd that the OTM areas would have polled at 65% being in favor of it. The unadvertised push was to help prevent the Birmingham government from being controlled by black residents, but it was being sold as an attempt to consolidate services and save money.
Cities like Nashville have a county wide city controlled government and have tried to encourage other cities to adopt the same system. I enjoy the suburb model where I feel like I have greater control. The Baton Rouge and St George fight is an example of a metro area pushing for the opposite of the Nashville model.
Posted on 6/2/26 at 4:16 pm to Ramblin Wreck
The city of Birmingham is a sinking ship. The suburbs there are fine
Posted on 6/2/26 at 4:20 pm to Ramblin Wreck
quote:
Could you imagine the City of Birmingham controlling Mountain Brook, Homewood, Vestavia Hills, Hoover, Trussville, etc.? It seems odd that the OTM areas would have polled at 65% being in favor of it.
No I can't imagine. And I'm sure if the people that voted in 1970 knew what things looked like today they wouldn't vote for it either. This will never happen.
Posted on 6/2/26 at 4:20 pm to Ramblin Wreck
I think 50 years later that 65% polling would come waaaay down from the OTM residents.
Posted on 6/2/26 at 4:29 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
The unadvertised push was to help prevent the Birmingham government from being controlled by black residents, ...
strangely enough the city we lived in did just the opposite back in the early 90's. with predictable results population peaked in 1990. 23% decrease since then.
This post was edited on 6/2/26 at 4:48 pm
Posted on 6/2/26 at 4:30 pm to Ramblin Wreck
Worked well for Baton Rouge, amirite?
Posted on 6/2/26 at 4:33 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
Worked well for Baton Rouge
Do we know yet?
This post was edited on 6/2/26 at 4:34 pm
Posted on 6/2/26 at 4:38 pm to Ramblin Wreck
Birmingham is trying to offer NIL deals to stave off Huntsville. I've seen this show before. The transfer portal is gonna be a shitshow.
Posted on 6/2/26 at 4:39 pm to Ramblin Wreck
I don't know. I don't really have an argument for or against it. It works for us in Nashville. The richer satellite cities got to keep some independence as far as police and zoning are concerned, and the outlying portions of the county pay less in taxes because they have less services. It' fine, I guess. It's been that way for 60 something years.
I think it would be a tall task to consolidate places nowadays. Louisville did it in 2003. Don't we have some posters from there? How's that working out?
I think it would be a tall task to consolidate places nowadays. Louisville did it in 2003. Don't we have some posters from there? How's that working out?
Posted on 6/2/26 at 4:41 pm to Ramblin Wreck
quote:
Do we know yet?
I think that is why everyone fractured off. They just created a mayor-president to treat the whole parish more like a city.
It is a terrible idea.
Smaller government is better in almost every single case.
This post was edited on 6/2/26 at 4:42 pm
Posted on 6/2/26 at 4:51 pm to PCRammer
quote:
I think 50 years later that 65% polling would come waaaay down from the OTM residents.
The other thing is that the demographics have changed so incredibly much within Birmingham city itself that the vote would look nothing like it did 55 years ago.
There were 300,000 people living in city limits, and it was 57% white. The metropolitan area was ~850K people.
Today the city itself is less than 200,000 people and is 68% black. The metropolitan area is 1.1M people. The percentage of the city that is black is, interestingly, shrinking after about six consecutive decades of increase; conversely, the share of the city that is white is increasing for the first time in about six decades. That is because the parts of town that are actually attracting and keeping people (Highlands, Crestwood, Avondale, Forest Park, etc.) are largely white while the northern, northeastern, and western parts of the city are emptying out.
Posted on 6/2/26 at 4:52 pm to Ramblin Wreck
1970 is so long ago and irrelevant to today that it might as well be BC.
Posted on 6/2/26 at 4:54 pm to Ramblin Wreck
I don’t think B’ham could ever get Mountain Brook and Vestavia.
Posted on 6/2/26 at 5:13 pm to BottomlandBrew
quote:
I think it would be a tall task to consolidate places nowadays. Louisville did it in 2003. Don't we have some posters from there? How's that working out?
Poorly, but Jefferson County's (Kentucky) problems really originated when they merged the city and county public school systems in 1975. That pulverized what was a really good county public system.
What happened in Louisville is that because of a large existing Catholic population (one of the top 5 or 10 %-wise in the country IIRC) and widespread Catholic school system, what were otherwise good, traditional single sex Catholic schools but nothing remarkable became academic and athletic powerhouses (you know them if you know Louisville - St. Xavier, Trinity, and DeSales on the boys side and Sacred Heart, Assumption, Mercy, and Presentation on the girls side) as families wholesale took their kids out of the public school system and into the Catholic one, many non-Catholics included. It's effectively a parallel school system with 10 Catholic high schools (many of them big) and, until a recent consolidation, something like 35 - 40 Catholic elementary schools. A metro area of Louisville's size has no reason to have so many large private schools. The one thing it has done is kept property prices down relatively to peer cities, as huge chunks of middle and upper middle class people don't utilize the public school system and are forking over $15,000 - 30,000 or more a year in private (typically Catholic) schools a year that would otherwise be going indirectly into a mortgage or directly into property taxes.
Jefferson County Alabama would never go for it because the towns with independent school districts and police departments won't move an inch on any of it. Funnily enough, Birmingham has a bit of the opposite problem; the few private schools in the Birmingham area are either tiny and ultra-expensive or service a relatively niche Catholic population (John Carroll, which isn't that big). The property prices in the OTM towns are outrageously high relative to what they are for similar homes in similar areas compared to peer cities - like, not far off from Nashville high in Mountain Brook, Homewood, Vestavia, et al.
This post was edited on 6/2/26 at 5:14 pm
Posted on 6/2/26 at 5:14 pm to AbuTheMonkey
quote:
while the northern, northeastern, and western parts of the city are emptying out
Forestdale, Fultondale, and Center Point say hi.
Gardendale is on its way to becoming Center Point 2.0.
At the rate things are going, I’m giving Hoover about ten years before it becomes the next Center Point.
Posted on 6/2/26 at 5:18 pm to BottomlandBrew
Depends on the area. Washington Parish has 40,000 people and a sheriffs office, Bogalusa and Franklinton have a police and fire dept, and the parish has multiple volunteer departments. I'm of the opinion that the Sheriff should handle all policing, while the emergency preparedness team manages fire services. Get rid of all the admin that comes along with multiple departments and use that money to provide a better service. I'm kinda tired of all these little kingdoms these people set up.
Posted on 6/2/26 at 5:21 pm to Ramblin Wreck
I doubt even the fake liberals in Mountain Brook will ultimately vote to let the lunatics downtown run their village.
If they do they deserve everything they get but it’ll be a damn shame because that OM/VH/Vestavia/MB area is one of the best suburb areas in the SE to raise kids that no one talks about.
If they do they deserve everything they get but it’ll be a damn shame because that OM/VH/Vestavia/MB area is one of the best suburb areas in the SE to raise kids that no one talks about.
Posted on 6/2/26 at 5:22 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
I think that is why everyone fractured off. They just created a mayor-president to treat the whole parish more like a city. It is a terrible idea. Smaller government is better in almost every single case.
Except for the most important service that local government provides, infrastructure.
If Central is on it's own do we get the Central throughway?
If St George is on its own do we get the new Pecue interchange that just opened up this year?
We can't get a loop because the parish leaders of the metro area refuse to cooperate. Once the city-parish gov't goes away does parish wide infrastructure projects go way with it?
This post was edited on 6/2/26 at 5:23 pm
Posted on 6/2/26 at 5:24 pm to TIGERHOLD
quote:
At the rate things are going, I’m giving Hoover about ten years before it becomes the next Center Point.
I strongly disagree as a Hoover resident. Hoover has a well run government, lots of million dollar plus home neighborhoods, lots of public parks and a population that could rival Birmingham’s in 10 years (currently 100,000 compared to 200,000 in Birmingham). Center Point is all low income, high crime, and just got around to starting a police department.
Popular
Back to top

15






