re: Archaeologists Discover 7,000-Year-Old Structure Older Than Stonehenge or Pyramids of Giza

quote:

---

The construction of the LSU Indian Moundsbegan 11,000 years ago.

---

Those are big mounds of dirt. That shite doesnt count

quote:

---

yet they continue to be taught as if they are true

---

what do you want them to do, teach them as if they’re false?

I stopped reading as soon as I saw the article use B.C.E.

They created a system of government with Czechs and balances......

YOUNGER DRYAS

I’ve seen older structures near the quad

quote:

---

the famed Pyramids of Giza are thought to have been erected around 2600 B.C.E. at the earliest.

---

Them shits are way older than that.

Was watching something the other day where a guy built tunnels and an underground bunker in his back yard. When they have particularly dry summers, the grass dies in the shape of the underground structure first and that was happening to him. Ties to this story a bit in that he mentioned that's how they found a lot of the Roman sub-structures/foundations that were in England. A dry summer suddenly shows a detailed outline of something built on that site 1000+ years ago.

My dead grass just shows where my dog likes to piss.

quote:

---

For comparison, construction on Stonehenge is believed to started around 3100 B.C.E., while the famed Pyramids of Giza are thought to have been erected around 2600 B.C.E. at the earliest. That makes the roundel at least 1,000 years older than Stonehenge and several thousand years older than the pyramids.

---

Some one help me with the math. I was taught that 3100-2600=500, not several thousands.

ETA: Hey down voter, please explain the math to me. What am I missing?

That was obviously a boil and go.