Started By
Message

re: 11 day difference between Italy and the US

Posted on 3/13/20 at 3:12 pm to
Posted by TRUERockyTop
Appalachia
Member since Sep 2011
16871 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

Where are you finding these tables? I’ve bee. Trying to google charts but didn’t have much luck


Here you go:

LINK
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22966 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

Of course,

My point was simple. In terms of important things like healthcare capacity (which is the problem in Italy) per capita infection rates are incredibly important.

ETA: and, in fairness, looking at this on national level isn’t very helpful given the regional nature of healthcare.


Ah, I see what you’re saying. I agree.
Posted by Undertow
Member since Sep 2016
9107 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 3:18 pm to
I’m no expert but I don’t think viruses such as this fare well in warmer weather. I think it’s good that it reached us a little later because it’s a little warmer. I predict it will start to fade as it gets warmer, sort of like the flu does.
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
34125 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 3:19 pm to
Your chart is nonsense

Everyone with a brain realizes this virus expanded around the world due to Chinese nationals traveling from China in relation to their New Year
quote:

Chinese New Year for the year 2020 is celebrated/ observed on Saturday, January 25.

So knowing that the start date for all countries was late Jan, run your chart again
quote:

The first cases of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic in Italy were confirmed on 31 January 2020, when two Chinese tourists in Rome tested positive for coronavirus disease 2019,

quote:

The first confirmed case in the United States of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic was announced on January 21, 2020
Posted by Winston Cup
Dallas Cowboys Fan
Member since May 2016
66902 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

So Italy canceled their NCAAT Tournament too?!

no worse, seria A
Posted by gpburdell
ATL
Member since Jun 2015
1596 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

Of course,

My point was simple. In terms of important things like healthcare capacity (which is the problem in Italy) per capita infection rates are incredibly important.

ETA: and, in fairness, looking at this on national level isn’t very helpful given the regional nature of healthcare.


Yep which is scary since the USA has less hospital beds per capita than Italy...

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/12/upshot/coronavirus-biggest-worry-hospital-capacity.html

quote:

Our country has only 2.8 hospital beds per 1,000 people. That’s fewer than in Italy (3.2), China (4.3) and South Korea (12.3), all of which have had struggles. More important, there are only so many intensive care beds and ventilators.

It’s estimated that we have about 45,000 intensive care unit beds in the United States. In a moderate outbreak, about 200,000 Americans would need one.
Posted by xxTIMMYxx
Member since Aug 2019
17562 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

Italy has 20% of our population though


So our numbers will probably be higher
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49384 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

Yep which is scary since the USA has less hospital beds per capita than Italy...



True but misleading.

We have the most critical care beds per capita in the world.

We have 34 per 100,000

Italy has 12 per 100,000
Posted by X123F45
Member since Apr 2015
29782 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

Until you realize our numbers are so small because we haven’t been adequately testing.


So using your logic, Italy has tested every single citizen?
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
59109 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 3:59 pm to
Positives aren't the issue, it's the mortality rate and the US has gone down steadily while Italy hasn't.
Posted by SundayFunday
Member since Sep 2011
10364 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 4:01 pm to
Is any of that accurate? There are fake charts all over the place.
Posted by SundayFunday
Member since Sep 2011
10364 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 4:02 pm to
Thsi chart har 800+ more infected than the johns hopkins chart and 8 more deaths

Whats the deal? I trust JH more than Worldometer but JH has had issues with the thing past couple days.
Posted by Vlatket
Member since Oct 2016
7475 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 4:17 pm to
Yep! They say all the major countries are on that trend. It's gon get real interesting.

LINK
This post was edited on 3/13/20 at 4:18 pm
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21764 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

We have 34 per 100,000

Italy has 12 per 100,000


The relevant statistic is what is the occupancy % of those beds.

How many are free at the moment?

Most hospitals have near full ICU's with patients for other things.
This post was edited on 3/13/20 at 4:24 pm
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
10521 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

quote:
I'd like to see #s of tests run compared to Italy. We have many more people infected than the number posted.


Data is a few days old

LINK





This page has higher numbers for US even through March 8th, but it also includes state public lab testings. 8th - 11th don't have final numbers yet, but US is pushing 16,000 tests through March 11th after final state numbers sent to CDC.for 8th - 11th. Even CDC alone had over 3,800 tests up to March 7th & with states US totals were closer to 11,000 up to March 7th. Not saying that's enough, but It Is just more than 1,707 by March 8th.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/testing-in-us.html


Edit to update estimate after numbers through March 11 updated today.
This post was edited on 3/13/20 at 5:00 pm
Posted by GusMcRae
Deep in the heart of the Big Sleazy
Member since Oct 2008
3780 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

Wow. Hope we do a better job at containing the spread, but that’s definitely a pattern I’d be shocked if we do not have more than 12,000 cases on March 22nd.


If we have 12,000 cases or less on 3/22, it would be a huge success.
Posted by Cymry Teigr
Member since Sep 2012
2138 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 5:16 pm to
That estimate of 45k ICU beds is totally wrong. It’s currently 97,700

American Hospital Association.
This post was edited on 3/13/20 at 5:17 pm
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
134528 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

Scary, but we do have 5 times their population



And orders of magnitude times their land area
Posted by TigerDeBaiter
Member since Dec 2010
10727 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 5:45 pm to
This is exactly why everything is on hold. Cut the top of the curve off.

Anybody who isn’t a moron understands this.

I admittedly initially thought the cancellations were dumb. But after seeing the data, it makes sense.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21764 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

That estimate of 45k ICU beds is totally wrong. It’s currently 97,700


How many are available?
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram