- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 11 day difference between Italy and the US
Posted on 3/14/20 at 9:47 pm to StringedInstruments
Posted on 3/14/20 at 9:47 pm to StringedInstruments
If you consider the difference in population, having the same numbers as Italy means we are dominating this thing.

Posted on 3/14/20 at 9:53 pm to Tigahs24Seven
quote:
Nope, I meant to post it right where I posted it....
Thanks for reading tho..
And you felt compelled to post political bullshite here because...?
Posted on 3/14/20 at 10:07 pm to bodask42
quote:
Update today (Saturday 3-14): United States is over 2600 patients. Kinda crazy how close it tracks to Italy so far.
What is best source for this?
WHO is showing 1678 cases today and graphs & new cases are based on report date.
CDC is showing 1629 and case graphs & dates are based on date of illness onset. Case page was also last updated yesterday & probably using numbers end of day Thursday. WHO may be adding the repatriated persons with virus from China and the cruise ship, so WHO is also using Thursday numbers (WHO' new case numbers & daily graphs show net change each day from CDC's total while CDC's graphs same data by illness onset).
CDC's testing page was actually updated today adding around 3000 tests to the daily testing totals over past 2 weeks. Dates and graphs on testing page are based on when they received specimen to reflect when specimens became available to them which seems more of an internal concern and should go back to date of collection from patient.
Not completely sure if illness onset and collection from patient are same dates, but daily testing dates by cdc are definitely different from both. If CDC is still updating testing numbers for dates back to Feb confirmed cases update on Monday using illness onset could show more in Feb than I was thinking making just showing net change in total like WHO a little off in time frames. Throw in presumptive results from states and time length to be confirmed by CDC and then input in confirmed numbers on CDC page the 2 big official agencies don't seem to best for current days updates for U.S.
At some point increasing daily testing numbers will level out and existing infected patients who couldn't be tested before will stop impacting daily numbers. Until then I still like looking at CDC's numbers to see illness onset dates and number of tests performed, but they are just delayed already and even days reported may not be final for awhile.
Posted on 3/15/20 at 9:25 pm to StringedInstruments
nm
This post was edited on 3/15/20 at 9:55 pm
Posted on 3/15/20 at 9:34 pm to Roaad
quote:ssshhh
you consider the difference in population, having the same numbers as Italy means we are dominating this thing.
Posted on 3/15/20 at 9:44 pm to NYCAuburn
Wouldn’t a true comparison also include population density and geography?
Posted on 3/15/20 at 9:52 pm to LSUfan20005
quote:
Wouldn’t a true comparison also include population density and geography?
and what we call a 'mother' (in vinegar maker terms) or nucleus.
La Lombardia had a shite ton of Chinese sweat shoppers fresh off the plane from China. Dense mother.
Posted on 3/16/20 at 8:09 am to NYNolaguy1
quote:
This is the real issue in my mind. Lots of ICU beds are great, but stacking patients has limits.
It’s not just that... if we had 10 more beds, we could not even staff them. The nursing shortage is fairly acute in my area, and even moreso for highly skilled ICU nurses.
Posted on 3/16/20 at 8:12 am to 9Fiddy
Not really at all. Infections were basically same time. The gap is just in testing.
They are older but we are 10 times fatter so.....
They are older but we are 10 times fatter so.....
Posted on 3/16/20 at 8:24 am to StringedInstruments
Just my curiosity, where is this graph taken from?
Popular
Back to top


1






