Started By
Message

What’s to stop a qb from throwing the ball backwards once

Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:14 pm
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
57821 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:14 pm
Hit before being sacked
It’s an incompletion right?
Teams are gonna start abusing the rule
Posted by Chrome
Chromeville
Member since Nov 2007
13685 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:19 pm to
John Forcade for the win. He tossed the ball to the ref before being sacked and only got a delay of game penalty.
Posted by Captain9905
Member since Aug 2021
20 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 8:04 pm to
Yep. If you’re being tackled throw the ball at the ground. No grounding according to the rule.
Posted by BEATbama05
Benton, LA
Member since Oct 2008
736 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 8:16 pm to
How did the refs know his intent was to actually throw it forward, rather than simply raise his arm, or pump fake a defender?
Posted by Delta9
Member since Jun 2021
924 posts
Posted on 9/14/26 at 8:44 pm to
Judgement call by the official. Called exactly as the rule is written. Good call, bad rule, maybe. The rule compels the official to determine the intended flight of the ball after the throwing motion has begun.
Posted by mindbreaker
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
7930 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 6:41 am to
Aaron Brooks intended to throw the ball forward. where was that rule then?
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
22454 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:00 am to
That was basically Eisen’s take. How do you have a rule in place that doesn’t line up with what you actually see on the field. The rule is in place and was correctly applied; however, they need to fix the rule ASAP.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
483069 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:05 am to
quote:

What’s to stop a qb from throwing the ball backwards

This is where "intent" matters
Posted by saints5021
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2010
19689 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:27 am to
If cocking your arm up = intention to throw, simply have QBs keep the arm cocked at all times. No sack fumbles ever again.
Posted by Fanatics
Member since Nov 2025
548 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:28 am to
i cant think of an instance where intent should be part of the rules. you can always argue what you intended to do verse what happened. olineman intended to block not hold or cb intended to get a pick 6 not dpi. its ridiculous, you play as well as your opponent allows
This post was edited on 9/15/26 at 7:32 am
Posted by chitiger91
Lake Bluff IL
Member since Apr 2016
3132 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:34 am to
Get the goodell nutsack out ur mouth.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
483069 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:35 am to
quote:

i cant think of an instance where intent should be part of the rules


Just read OP of this thread
Posted by Fanatics
Member since Nov 2025
548 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:41 am to
i did, without the bs intent what happens with the OPs arguement. its a live ball.
This post was edited on 9/15/26 at 7:42 am
Posted by whodatfan
Member since Mar 2008
22276 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:43 am to
Your post count at 1 min per post averages out at almost an entire year straight of posting. If you average 10 min of browsing per post, it puts you at 10 years straight of browsing/posting on this site. Your account is 22 years old. So that's about half of the last 2 decades spent on this site or half of your day, every day. Incomprehensible.
Posted by paulb52
Member since Dec 2019
9401 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 10:45 am to
Only if that was his intent. Refs will need to ask him about it.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
48391 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:10 am to
QB's can just drop back with the ball elevated to the shoulder and keep it there until you are ready to throw. Fumble every time you are hit and its incomplete. No more sacks period!
This post was edited on 9/15/26 at 11:12 am
Posted by southsidedell
Tucson, AZ
Member since Dec 2016
5833 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 12:32 pm to
Its ridiculous when you think about it. "Intent" smh. Its a bullshite rule that needs to be looked at asap. They have opened pandoras box with this one.
Posted by jpggpj
Chair
Member since Oct 2005
4047 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 12:38 pm to
How is this play different from when a qb takes a snap and goes to throw a quick pass to the wide receiver along the line of scrimmage but accidently throws it too far back? If that ball hits the ground if the wr does not make the catch then it is considered a lateral which in turn becomes a fumble once it hits the ground? His intent on that quick pass off of the line of scrimmage was to throw it forward but he accidently threw it too far back and it becomes a fumble once on the ground but in this case, the qb's intent to throw it forward gets rewarded because he is getting hit in the process?

Posted by Delta9
Member since Jun 2021
924 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 2:47 pm to
Very low intelligence quotient in this thread
Posted by paulb52
Member since Dec 2019
9401 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:53 am to
Maybe, but there is no guarantee how they will call it after “further review” bullshite.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram