
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What’s to stop a qb from throwing the ball backwards once
Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:14 pm
Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:14 pm
Hit before being sacked
It’s an incompletion right?
Teams are gonna start abusing the rule
It’s an incompletion right?
Teams are gonna start abusing the rule
Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:19 pm to nicholastiger
John Forcade for the win. He tossed the ball to the ref before being sacked and only got a delay of game penalty.
Posted on 9/14/26 at 8:04 pm to nicholastiger
Yep. If you’re being tackled throw the ball at the ground. No grounding according to the rule.
Posted on 9/14/26 at 8:16 pm to nicholastiger
How did the refs know his intent was to actually throw it forward, rather than simply raise his arm, or pump fake a defender?
Posted on 9/14/26 at 8:44 pm to nicholastiger
Judgement call by the official. Called exactly as the rule is written. Good call, bad rule, maybe. The rule compels the official to determine the intended flight of the ball after the throwing motion has begun.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 6:41 am to nicholastiger
Aaron Brooks intended to throw the ball forward. where was that rule then?
Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:00 am to Delta9
That was basically Eisen’s take. How do you have a rule in place that doesn’t line up with what you actually see on the field. The rule is in place and was correctly applied; however, they need to fix the rule ASAP.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:05 am to nicholastiger
quote:
What’s to stop a qb from throwing the ball backwards
This is where "intent" matters
Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:27 am to SlowFlowPro
If cocking your arm up = intention to throw, simply have QBs keep the arm cocked at all times. No sack fumbles ever again.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:28 am to SlowFlowPro
i cant think of an instance where intent should be part of the rules. you can always argue what you intended to do verse what happened. olineman intended to block not hold or cb intended to get a pick 6 not dpi. its ridiculous, you play as well as your opponent allows
This post was edited on 9/15/26 at 7:32 am
Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:34 am to Delta9
Get the goodell nutsack out ur mouth.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:35 am to Fanatics
quote:
i cant think of an instance where intent should be part of the rules
Just read OP of this thread
Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:41 am to SlowFlowPro
i did, without the bs intent what happens with the OPs arguement. its a live ball.
This post was edited on 9/15/26 at 7:42 am
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:43 am to SlowFlowPro
Your post count at 1 min per post averages out at almost an entire year straight of posting. If you average 10 min of browsing per post, it puts you at 10 years straight of browsing/posting on this site. Your account is 22 years old. So that's about half of the last 2 decades spent on this site or half of your day, every day. Incomprehensible. 
Posted on 9/15/26 at 10:45 am to nicholastiger
Only if that was his intent. Refs will need to ask him about it.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:10 am to saints5021
QB's can just drop back with the ball elevated to the shoulder and keep it there until you are ready to throw. Fumble every time you are hit and its incomplete. No more sacks period!
This post was edited on 9/15/26 at 11:12 am
Posted on 9/15/26 at 12:32 pm to Vacherie Saint
Its ridiculous when you think about it. "Intent" smh. Its a bullshite rule that needs to be looked at asap. They have opened pandoras box with this one.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 12:38 pm to southsidedell
How is this play different from when a qb takes a snap and goes to throw a quick pass to the wide receiver along the line of scrimmage but accidently throws it too far back? If that ball hits the ground if the wr does not make the catch then it is considered a lateral which in turn becomes a fumble once it hits the ground? His intent on that quick pass off of the line of scrimmage was to throw it forward but he accidently threw it too far back and it becomes a fumble once on the ground but in this case, the qb's intent to throw it forward gets rewarded because he is getting hit in the process?
Posted on 9/15/26 at 2:47 pm to chitiger91
Very low intelligence quotient in this thread
Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:53 am to nicholastiger
Maybe, but there is no guarantee how they will call it after “further review” bullshite.

Popular
Back to top

9












