- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Did Saints waste two draft picks on MI22
Posted on 11/7/11 at 1:39 pm to Jcorye1
Posted on 11/7/11 at 1:39 pm to Jcorye1
quote:
he was a late first round pick... I want to see him develop a little before I label him an "awful" pick.
for the 28th pick he might be ok, but the Saints gave up their 2012 first rounder, even if you figured that to be in the 28 range, that's too much for 1 RB, unless he becomes AD or LT and that was unlikely, especially given type of offense the Saints run.
Posted on 11/7/11 at 1:42 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:
for the 28th pick he might be ok, but the Saints gave up their 2012 first rounder, even if you figured that to be in the 28 range, that's too much for 1 RB, unless he becomes AD or LT and that was unlikely, especially given type of offense the Saints run.
I forgot he costed another pick, yeah I can see why everyone is not jumping on board now.
At least you know he won't be as bad as Maroney.
This post was edited on 11/7/11 at 1:43 pm
Posted on 11/7/11 at 1:47 pm to The Easter Bunny
The problem now is your gonna have to shell out for Brees, now you have Pierre Thomas under contract, Sproles is earning his money but is probably a bigger piece of cap than he needs to be and Ingram who can't even get lions share of carries.
Unfortunately, QB and RB might prevent the Saints from being able to field a quality WR and OL core
not to mention this team still needs defense
Unfortunately, QB and RB might prevent the Saints from being able to field a quality WR and OL core
not to mention this team still needs defense
Posted on 11/7/11 at 1:53 pm to Jcorye1
Could have taken Ridley for much less and got the same production.
Posted on 11/7/11 at 1:56 pm to CajunFootball
quote:
Could have taken Ridley for much less and got the same production.
You can look this up if you want, but I was insanely high on Demarco Murray and actually pretty irritated the Patriots didn't take him. He went really, really late for someone who can run inside/outside, catch, screen, and pass protect. I know he was an injury risk, but its really hard to get the full package after the 2nd round. Riddler still kind of sucks at pass protection.
Posted on 11/7/11 at 1:58 pm to TigerRantMan99
I think it remains to be seen. If the OL blocks like they did yesterday I think he will have more success.
It was a glaring position of need. I dont think they gave up that much. They are just -1 as far as draft picks. Not that big of deal, even if he doesn't work out.
He may never be a star but he will be more than serviceable
It was a glaring position of need. I dont think they gave up that much. They are just -1 as far as draft picks. Not that big of deal, even if he doesn't work out.
He may never be a star but he will be more than serviceable
Posted on 11/7/11 at 1:59 pm to Jcorye1
quote:
Riddler still kind of sucks at pass protection.
Saints have other backs that can do this while he learns. He would have given the same production as Ingram though, imo. Murray looks good right now, and I'll admit I didn't think he would.
Posted on 11/7/11 at 2:06 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
It was a glaring position of need
if you figure 5 guys are going to get hurt every year maybe. It was mind numbingly stupid to trade an extra pick after giving Thomas a new contract and then signing Sproles.
quote:
. They are just -1 as far as draft picks. Not that big of deal, even if he doesn't work out.
-1 first rounder is different than being -1 4th.
quote:
He may never be a star but he will be more than serviceable
You use 2 picks on someone he needs to be more than servicable. Its a waste given the position.
Posted on 11/7/11 at 2:08 pm to TigerRantMan99
quote:
Did Saints waste a draft pick on MI22
Too early to tell. He's in his rookie season, for frick's sake. Give him a couple of years.
Posted on 11/7/11 at 2:11 pm to The Easter Bunny
quote:
They probably weren't expecting to get Sproles and have him go beast mode
Posted on 11/7/11 at 2:19 pm to Hulkklogan
First off we are being stupid to think Ingram was a wasted pick.
Look at what the situation was at the time of the draft. Our running backs were Thomas (finished season injured) Ivory ( finished season injured) and Bush (finished season injured and was due too much money to retain).
The Saints unlike their fans had learned from the mistake of going into a playoff game with no running game. The Saints wanted to get rid of Bush but had to get a running back to do so even if that back did not provide the same skill set as Bush. I believe all along the Saints were going to draft Ingram and then Jordan fell to them. The Saints took Jordan as he provided better value but instead of just resting on what they had done were still trying to fix the RB situation. Drafting Ingram was the right move and had it been Thomas who got nicked up instead of Ingram we would all be singing the front offices praises for having backup plans in place.
The Saints have built a team that can withstand any season ending injury to any player but Brees, and I am glad they have.
Look at what the situation was at the time of the draft. Our running backs were Thomas (finished season injured) Ivory ( finished season injured) and Bush (finished season injured and was due too much money to retain).
The Saints unlike their fans had learned from the mistake of going into a playoff game with no running game. The Saints wanted to get rid of Bush but had to get a running back to do so even if that back did not provide the same skill set as Bush. I believe all along the Saints were going to draft Ingram and then Jordan fell to them. The Saints took Jordan as he provided better value but instead of just resting on what they had done were still trying to fix the RB situation. Drafting Ingram was the right move and had it been Thomas who got nicked up instead of Ingram we would all be singing the front offices praises for having backup plans in place.
The Saints have built a team that can withstand any season ending injury to any player but Brees, and I am glad they have.
Posted on 11/7/11 at 2:27 pm to VA LSU fan
quote:
The Saints unlike their fans had learned from the mistake of going into a playoff game with no running game
then they are idiots, having all your RB's hurt is freakish bad luck. Plus they did not lose Seattle because of injuried RB's. They gave PT a new deal before the draft. but the broader point that most miss is it has nothing to do with Ingram per se. There is no need to draft a RB in the first round let alone give up a future first rounder for 1. It doesn't matter that he was rated as "the best RB" in this draft class. The Saints have proven over and over that they can find affective RB's (Thomas, Ivory, Bell, Hamilton, Sproles). The top 3 rushers in the NFL in 2010 were an undrafted FA, a 3rd and a 5th rounder. It was a bad pick, made to look much much worse given the performance so far from Ingram.
This post was edited on 11/7/11 at 2:29 pm
Posted on 11/7/11 at 2:29 pm to TigerRantMan99
quote:
Did Saints waste a draft pick on MI22
No. Pretty sure we wasted two draft picks.
Posted on 11/7/11 at 2:31 pm to H-Town Tiger
RB's shouldn't drafted in the first round unless they are a rare talent. Their NFL life is very short to begin with and most do not transition well. Like H-Town said, it's not about Ingram but about drafting a RB in the first round and giving up what they did for him.
You can look at what Atlanta gave up fo Julio, but really they had no other weakness last year then needing some more offensive weapons and a little help on defense. Saints already had two solid RBs(Ivory/Thomas) and traded for Sproles(new Reggie).
You can look at what Atlanta gave up fo Julio, but really they had no other weakness last year then needing some more offensive weapons and a little help on defense. Saints already had two solid RBs(Ivory/Thomas) and traded for Sproles(new Reggie).
Posted on 11/7/11 at 2:38 pm to NOTORlOUSD
quote:
With Thomas and Ivory already in the backfield, I don't know why the Saints saw that as a position of need in the first place.
At the time of the draft they still had Reggie, not Sproles, and the downfall of the 2010 season was not having enough capable running backs because PT and Ivory are known injury risks. That still does make you question why Ingram and not a back later in the draft, but I also don't think you can fully judge this move yet. It seems like someone will have to get traded next season, so if drafting Ingram leads to trading PT for a starter at another position, it changes the value a bit.
Posted on 11/7/11 at 2:57 pm to NawlinsTiger9
at the time it was a good idea. now, not so much.
Posted on 11/7/11 at 2:59 pm to TigerRantMan99
did they overpay: yes
do I really like Ingram and think he can be a complete, intelligent, powerful back: yes
I'm honestly thinking that the biggest contributor to Ingram's non elite start is that he just doesn't get enough consistency with carries in this offense. Oh and our Oline was kind of sucking donkey balls for most of the games before he was hurt.
do I really like Ingram and think he can be a complete, intelligent, powerful back: yes
I'm honestly thinking that the biggest contributor to Ingram's non elite start is that he just doesn't get enough consistency with carries in this offense. Oh and our Oline was kind of sucking donkey balls for most of the games before he was hurt.
Posted on 11/7/11 at 3:00 pm to TigerinATL
quote:
the downfall of the 2010 season was not having enough capable running backs
no it was shitty defense, just ask Marshown Lynch.
quote:
It seems like someone will have to get traded next season, so if drafting Ingram leads to trading PT for a starter at another position, it changes the value a bit
This isn't baseball or fanstasy FB, player for player trades are rare. Why would some one give up a starter of value for an older RB, with a history of injuries and a big contract, when they can just draft some one in the 3rd round? At best you'd get a 4th round draft pick for PT
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News