- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Yahoo: Lakers trying to rework AD trade
Posted on 6/18/19 at 8:52 pm to rondo
Posted on 6/18/19 at 8:52 pm to rondo
If the Lakers back out of the deal that would mean -- barring another agreement -- they would start the season without AD. They aren't going to risk it by attempting to alter the deal agreed upon.
There are other ways they'll try to create salary but I doubt this is one of them.
There are other ways they'll try to create salary but I doubt this is one of them.
0
Posted on 6/18/19 at 8:52 pm to Tellem
Unless they’re sending us Kuzma, Griffin shouldn’t even pick up the phone
Posted on 6/18/19 at 8:54 pm to PrayingMantis
quote:
We lose 10 mil in cap space and can’t have our rook in SL
That's if the deal were to push to July 30
This new push is to add players...not move the date back
Posted on 6/18/19 at 9:03 pm to PhillyTiger90
Is it a realistic possibility that they could say frick it, and send Kuzma?
This post was edited on 6/18/19 at 9:04 pm
Posted on 6/18/19 at 9:06 pm to LSUneaux
Only if no one helps them take those contracts off their hands. That’s probably their last resort.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 9:07 pm to LSUneaux
They could. It would open up space and let them bump the date of the trade back.
But it would take away what is currently projected as a starter on a controlled contract. Meaning they may get a third max guy but they are still stuck digging up two starters and a bunch of reserves on minimum contracts, the room exception, the biannual exception, and the mid level exception.
But it would take away what is currently projected as a starter on a controlled contract. Meaning they may get a third max guy but they are still stuck digging up two starters and a bunch of reserves on minimum contracts, the room exception, the biannual exception, and the mid level exception.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 9:09 pm to teke184
They are screwed....l. o. l.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 9:13 pm to WITCH DOCTOR
The trade is not official yet.
Though it would be a bad move for the Lakers to force a rework.
Though it would be a bad move for the Lakers to force a rework.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 9:29 pm to WicKed WayZ
quote:
f I’m Griff I tell them to send over Kuzma or frick off.
Their mistake
And 3 or 4 seconds.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 9:30 pm to VA LSU fan
quote:
Though it would be a bad move for the Lakers to force a rework.
This is an understatement. The Lakers are a team that basically live off of trading for other teams' players/stars. Burning that bridge eternally screws them.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 9:34 pm to Unknown_Poster
although if I'm the Lakers, this is what I'd do. I'd go back on the trade, then fire Pelinka, and make him the scapegoat, and try to save face
Posted on 6/18/19 at 9:35 pm to DeionDeion
Shut up.
Don’t even say that
Don’t even say that
Posted on 6/18/19 at 9:36 pm to DeionDeion
I think they are beyond that point.
As of now, they “have” AD. They back out of the trade and they lose him, probably lose LeBron, and their fan base makes the Rodney King riots look like a parade.
As of now, they “have” AD. They back out of the trade and they lose him, probably lose LeBron, and their fan base makes the Rodney King riots look like a parade.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 9:36 pm to VA LSU fan
quote:
Though it would be a bad move for the Lakers to force a rework.
Silver would bring the hammer down on them. You wanna talk about "bad faith"? Hoo boy.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 9:38 pm to DeionDeion
And immediately LeBron would demand a trade.
As it would make it impossible for the Pels to deal with them again and it would turn the Lakers into a pariah for the foreseeable future. As no amount of glamour in that market is going to convince a star to jump into that fire. And no team is going to want to trade with them for now. And if anyone thought that locker was toxic last year, drag Hart, Ball, and Ingram back after they have all been happy to get out and the Ball’s especially have been burning bridges on the way out.
As it would make it impossible for the Pels to deal with them again and it would turn the Lakers into a pariah for the foreseeable future. As no amount of glamour in that market is going to convince a star to jump into that fire. And no team is going to want to trade with them for now. And if anyone thought that locker was toxic last year, drag Hart, Ball, and Ingram back after they have all been happy to get out and the Ball’s especially have been burning bridges on the way out.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 9:47 pm to Bronc
quote:
And immediately LeBron would demand a trade.
As it would make it impossible for the Pels to deal with them again and it would turn the Lakers into a pariah for the foreseeable future. As no amount of glamour in that market is going to convince a star to jump into that fire.
Well, if we're going down this rabbit hole...
Maybe then AD would want to stay and team with Zion to rule the NBA.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 9:48 pm to DeionDeion
quote:
although if I'm the Lakers, this is what I'd do. I'd go back on the trade, then fire Pelinka, and make him the scapegoat, and try to save face
That wouldn't be an FO call, that'd be ownership. No one would deal with them until the buss's sold the team.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 10:14 pm to VA LSU fan
Yea just read on ESPN if Glass doesn’t waive his $4m trade bonus or whatever,the trade won’t even go through.?
Posted on 6/18/19 at 10:23 pm to Zzyzx
I read that little piece too. I didn't like reading it. That can't be right though.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 10:26 pm to Zzyzx
Lol. No.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News