5
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The Pelicans Soon to be Starting 5
Posted on 11/9/26 at 8:59 am
Posted on 11/9/26 at 8:59 am
Jeremiah Fears
Trey Murphy III
Herb Jones
Zion Williamson
Yves Missi
Bench:
Saddiq Bey
Karlo Matkovich
Derrick Queen
Benedict Mathurin
PG TBD
Murray and Poole need to get traded.
Trey Murphy III
Herb Jones
Zion Williamson
Yves Missi
Bench:
Saddiq Bey
Karlo Matkovich
Derrick Queen
Benedict Mathurin
PG TBD
Murray and Poole need to get traded.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 9:23 am to Chad504boy
quote:
Murray and Poole need to get traded.
Need to is different from any team wanting them.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 9:32 am to Chad504boy
No one in the league is taking Poole unless you attach an asset to him and get back nothing.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 10:37 am to SEC Doctor
Phoenix may take Poole for Jalen Green at this point.
Salaries match but we would have an extra season of Green.
I’d probably rather let Poole expire instead because Green hasn’t done well in Phoenix, but that is a trade we can make without adding assets.
Salaries match but we would have an extra season of Green.
I’d probably rather let Poole expire instead because Green hasn’t done well in Phoenix, but that is a trade we can make without adding assets.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 10:41 am to teke184
quote:So...why would we do that?
Salaries match but we would have an extra season of Green.
Did we not learn when we traded CJ for Poole? We got worse AND added another year of a negative value contract.
Why do it again?
quote:I quite literally wouldn't even consider this trade without a 1st coming back our way. And no i'm not saying they would do that or should do that, just pointing out how absurd it would be to even think about repeating the cycle of adding another year of a negative value player and contract.
I’d probably rather let Poole expire instead because Green hasn’t done well in Phoenix
Posted on 11/9/26 at 11:18 am to shel311
I think the goal would be able to get anything back that we could try to develop and not lose the salary cap flexibility.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 11:23 am to Chad504boy
Are we sure Mathurin is better than McGowens?
Posted on 11/9/26 at 12:27 pm to LilWezyAna
He is absolutely not
Posted on 11/9/26 at 12:49 pm to PELsu
Poole and Green are the same person
Posted on 11/9/26 at 1:02 pm to teke184
quote:
Phoenix may take Poole for Jalen Green at this point.
Salaries match but we would have an extra season of Green.
I’d probably rather let Poole expire instead because Green hasn’t done well in Phoenix, but that is a trade we can make without adding assets.
That's how we got stuck with Poole in the first place. Would be a terrible idea to add another year of bad money.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 1:34 pm to SEC Doctor
I am not worried about Poole right now bc he is not playing. As long as he is on the bench that is fine.
The team has 1 win with DJM starting. 4 wins with Herb.
Start Herb.
The team has 1 win with DJM starting. 4 wins with Herb.
Start Herb.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 2:11 pm to Split2874
Is there actually any hope that we get rid of DJM soon? I understand Mosley probably has his hands tied with the starting lineup and that’s a higher up call but this organization is clearly not serious about winning if we’re going to continue to start a losing player at PG when we have a winning player on the bench.
Posted on 11/9/26 at 2:23 pm to SEC Doctor
quote:
That's how we got stuck with Poole in the first place. Would be a terrible idea to add another year of bad money.
Not true. Its only a bad idea if we are strapped for money.
The Poole/ CJ trade was about keeping 30mil to use on future assets. Trading Poole for Green would be the same.
Otherwise we lose $30mil in assets and end up with $0 cap space from it.
Its not "ideal" but its not a terrible idea.
The issue is that we should be trying to actually get a positive asset with the $30mil space and not do the same thing as last year with the hope that we actually get the positive asset next year.
We aren't stuck with Poole, we are stuck with $30mil to take back on other assets. If we trade Poole/ Green then we are still just stuck with $30mil to take back.
We should now be looking at positive assets with the $30mil instead of keeping the $30mil space and never getting the asset.
This post was edited on 11/9/26 at 2:27 pm
Posted on 11/9/26 at 8:00 pm to slutiger5
quote:
Need to is different from any team wanting them.
exactly....
i fully believe we are playing Murray to try to drive up his trade value, it's just he's not doing anything to help that
Posted on 11/9/26 at 8:15 pm to teke184
Imagine if we could draft someone like Alexander-Walker. That would be crazy
Posted on 11/10/26 at 1:31 pm to Chad504boy
Swap Saddiq and Karlo for Herb and Missi. And send Poole to a facility in NO East
Posted on 11/10/26 at 2:20 pm to LilWezyAna
quote:
Are we sure Mathurin is better than McGowens?
Mathurin is trash. He’ll be picking up that player option next year
Posted on 11/10/26 at 3:49 pm to Split2874
quote:
I am not worried about Poole right now bc he is not playing. As long as he is on the bench that is fine
He is expiring but if a player is making $34M i need him helping the team win.
Posted on 11/10/26 at 5:51 pm to Chad504boy
Missi makes Z worse because of spacing. Good player but needs to be traded if the goal is to keep Z. Karlos should continue start to allow space for Z with his stretching 3
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News