Started By
Message

re: Pels/Cavs discuss Collin Sexton trade

Posted on 7/12/21 at 7:07 pm to
Posted by Macintosh
Lane State University
Member since Sep 2011
56556 posts
Posted on 7/12/21 at 7:07 pm to
quote:

He is bad in the dumb zone shooting 33% between 16 feet and the 3 point line, but he hardly took any shots from there, just 7% of all FGA.
okay maybe that’s what it was. The twitter writers were saying he shot 31% from mid range in some capacity. I guess that’s it.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
30338 posts
Posted on 7/12/21 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

Sexton also sucks from midrange



Well BI doesn't. and why is that some knock on him when he's great from 3 and great at getting to the FT line?
He's not going to be Kevin Durant and be great from everywhere.
Posted by Macintosh
Lane State University
Member since Sep 2011
56556 posts
Posted on 7/12/21 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

He's not going to be Kevin Durant and be great from everywhere.

well if you’re about to invest near max money on him. You’d hope he’s more good at things than mediocre to bad. Either way he shouldn’t cost a lot to get.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
30338 posts
Posted on 7/12/21 at 7:17 pm to
quote:

well if you’re about to invest near max money on him. You’d hope he’s more good at things than mediocre to bad. Either way he shouldn’t cost a lot to get.




i 100% agree, but that's simply not how the NBA works.
Posted by Macintosh
Lane State University
Member since Sep 2011
56556 posts
Posted on 7/12/21 at 7:19 pm to
quote:

100% agree, but that's simply not how the NBA works.
you’re not wrong
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
62446 posts
Posted on 7/12/21 at 7:24 pm to
He shoots decent from everywhere but the dumb zone

3: 37.5%
10-16: 48.3%
3-10: 45.5%
0-3: 61%
FT: 81.5%

I would expect most if not all of those numbers to go up if he were playing with Zion and Ingram. With the extra space those 2 would get him I could see him jumping into the conversation of elite scorers. Maybe not for total points, but for his efficiency and ability to score from all over the floor.
Posted by jmcwhrter
Member since Nov 2012
7991 posts
Posted on 7/12/21 at 7:43 pm to
Big question for me is, is he a terrible defender because he's terrible or because he doesn't give a shite on a horrible team?
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
15055 posts
Posted on 7/12/21 at 7:49 pm to
quote:

Big question for me is, is he a terrible defender because he's terrible or because he doesn't give a shite on a horrible team?


I haven’t watch him play very often, but I’ve read he’s pretty locked in when he’s guarding his man and gives pretty good effort. Think his overall team defense needs work though, but that usually comes with experience. I could be wrong though
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
62446 posts
Posted on 7/12/21 at 7:53 pm to
He's listed at 6'1 so he's almost naturally going to be a terrible defender. Can he do things to make up for that like being active and playing the passing lanes is the question to ask.

If he can be active and smart on defense I think you can live with his defense.
This post was edited on 7/12/21 at 7:54 pm
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
20971 posts
Posted on 7/12/21 at 8:01 pm to
His defense has improved a lot each of the last two seasons. There's reason to hope that he still has room to get better.
Posted by 3PieceSpicy
Metairie
Member since Jan 2021
7913 posts
Posted on 7/12/21 at 8:58 pm to
Thanks for posting these. That’s part of what caught my eye when I started studying Sexton’s potential fit with the Pels. Yeah, he’s not great at the 16-22 ft shot, but he’s pretty damn good at everything else. Those 3-10ft and 10-16 ft percentages are borderline elite and those are the exact areas where Kira, Zo, seem to struggle. Kira was at 32% 3-10 ft and 20% 10-16ft. Zo was at 30% 3-10ft and 38% 10-16 ft. Naw was at 52% 3-10 and 40% 10-16, which is decent, but a terrible 48% inside of 3ft.

Another stat I like is that 32% of Sexton’s threes are unassisted. That’s not an insane Trae, Luka, Harden, Shai, CP3 like number but it’s better than what we currently have. It also lends credence that maybe Sexton isn’t as much of a gunner or ballhog than people say he is.

By comparison 21% of Ingram’s 3’s are unassisted. 16% of Lonzo’s 3’s are unassisted. 20% of Kira’s threes are unassisted (super low sample size), and 8% of NAW’s 3’s are unassisted.


Posted by Colonel Flagg
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
23488 posts
Posted on 7/12/21 at 9:28 pm to
While short he has a solid wingspan.
Posted by DLBalla
Member since Jul 2018
235 posts
Posted on 7/12/21 at 9:57 pm to
Just the move of Sexton replacing Ball as our lead guard would improve this team so much.

They call Collin "Young Bull" for a reason. He brings that intensity, fire, passion, resilience-- the exact things the Pels have lacked over the past 2 seasons (and beyond). He can be the engine that keeps the team going at high intensity when there's lulls in the team's energy/focus level. He is the ignition starter, Zion and BI are the main scoring engines.

And as others have pointed out, he's got the skillset the team needs. Quickness, driving, finishing, draw FT's, initiator, improving 3pt shooter, especially off the dribble.

Regardless, the team should move on from Ball in the best way possible for both sides. Just more a distraction that doesn't maximize our 2 best players.

Adams / Hayes
Zion /
Ingram/
NAW /
Sexton/ Kira

Add in lots of shooting and defense from the remaining spots. Championship core...
This post was edited on 7/12/21 at 10:00 pm
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
62446 posts
Posted on 7/12/21 at 10:05 pm to
The other thing about a Sexton is if there’s even a 20% chance he can be one of the top 3 pieces, you have to take it if the cost is low. If he works out you get to use the war chest on rounding out the roster and keeping things moving.
This post was edited on 7/12/21 at 10:06 pm
Posted by ThanosIsADemocrat
The Garden
Member since May 2018
9395 posts
Posted on 7/12/21 at 10:21 pm to
quote:

I hope the Pels can pull this one off. Would solve a lot of problems and raise our ceiling significantly. Sexton is a hell of a player and he’s only 22. Kira might have a 2% chance of ever having a season as good as Sexton just had at age 22.

Core of Sexton, NAW, Ingram, Zion, Hayes would be nasty and unguardable. Mix in some role players that defend and hit spot up 3’s and that’s a potential championship team.

Kevin Love fricking sucks. Who cares what he thinks of the guy? Also, do your homework, I know the play you are thinking of. He was pissed at the 80 year old college coach calling a set play instead of letting Love attack the mismatch against a guard in the post.

I’m convinced half our fanbase just wants us to suck forever.

Kira, 10, 2 future firsts for Sexton and Prince or Nance

Still leaves us with 8 firsts over the next 6 years and we would have the best young big 3 in the entire league.

Do whatever it takes Griff. Please don’t get hung up over an extra first in a deal like this for a player of this caliber.

You have to overpay for elite talent in this league. Yall seem to want to offer some bullshite trade package for Sexton, but if you do that, technically even a team like the Lakers could match it. Kira and 1 first ain’t getting this done.


Yikes is an understatement on this entire post.
Posted by ThanosIsADemocrat
The Garden
Member since May 2018
9395 posts
Posted on 7/12/21 at 10:33 pm to
quote:

Nice stats. Sexton is also a dog. He’s fiery as frick.


Opposing teams literally laughed at Cleveland because he made them so easy to defend.

No thanks. I’ll prefer high IQ players.
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
15055 posts
Posted on 7/12/21 at 11:04 pm to
quote:

The other thing about a Sexton is if there’s even a 20% chance he can be one of the top 3 pieces, you have to take it if the cost is low. If he works out you get to use the war chest on rounding out the roster and keeping things moving.


I’m onboard if it doesn’t cost us much. I just hope Griff learned his lesson with Adams and doesn’t extend Sexton until we see how he fits first. Adams would be lucky to get half what Griff just gave him if he hit the market this year.
Posted by 3PieceSpicy
Metairie
Member since Jan 2021
7913 posts
Posted on 7/13/21 at 1:00 am to
Pretty much everything in that post is spot on. If you want to nitpick valuation, that’s one thing. Prob is, a team like OKC is interested too and they have picks for days. Maybe we won’t have to give up everything I suggested, but it will probably take more than most seem to anticipate considering at least 6-8 teams are likely going to make offers. Maybe I suggested too rich of a package. But as I outlined in this post and others, even in an “overpay” situation, you still have 8 first rd picks in 6 years, a bunch of 2nds, the ability to resign zo or trade him, the ability to resign hart or trade him, Ingram, Zion, Naw, Hayes, and Nance or Prince after we include Bledsoe in the trade to balance it out more in our favor.

This is a very low risk, low cost trade that can ultimately raise our ceiling exponentially. If it doesn’t work out. We are still in a great spot asset wise. But if you take the time to watch some film (gameplay/interviews) and dive into the numbers of what Sexton can provide instead of relying on gossipy sources, I think you’d probably be able to see at least a few of Sexton’s positive traits and how they could translate seamlessly to our particular roster.
Posted by 3PieceSpicy
Metairie
Member since Jan 2021
7913 posts
Posted on 7/13/21 at 1:30 am to
quote:

I’ll prefer high iq players


Oh the irony…

Also, if this was actually true you’d be pulling for Cp3 and Monty over Jrue and Bud lol.

The problem with discussing players and all of that with you is you usually just simply come in with an emotional take. There doesn’t seem to be much high level thought behind it. It’s just your emotional gut opinion and you can’t ever see where anyone else is coming from even if they have a reasonable argument or position that they can support with stats, tape, other winning formulas in the nba, etc.

We’ve mostly had a hell of a thread here where people are posting potential trade packages, posting advanced stats and how they can relate to potential fit on our team, others offering reasonable discourse about why maybe he isn’t a fit, cost vs risk/reward of making this move, opportunity cost of not making this move, etc.

Comp that with you contributing that Kevin Love can’t stand him, which isn’t even true. Or simply saying you disagree with someone’s stance without elaborating or supporting why. Or saying you prefer high IQ players, indicating that you think Sexton is not high IQ because of some random gossip that no one has been able to source or corroborate.

It’s just not very productive boss. No one is ultimately right or wrong here. The issue is, you think you are always right no matter what the topic is and you have the inability to see things from any other standpoint other than your own initial narrow standpoint. People’s opinions and standpoints have mostly evolved from page 1 of this thread. It’s alright to have an open mind. It’s alright to sometimes deviate from your initial line in the sand. It’s also okay to double down, but do it in a bit more of a productive manner. Offer an alternative and/or a real, tangible reason why pursuing Sexton would be bad for our franchise.
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
11377 posts
Posted on 7/13/21 at 5:40 am to
This is my thing. Good players in the NBA usually do not play for losing teams. Our core would be 4 guys (Ball, Zion, Ingram and Sexton) that have never played on a team with a winning record..
Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10 11 ... 19
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 19Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram