- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Official 2018 Pelicans Offseason Thread
Posted on 7/11/18 at 6:57 am to Crewz
Posted on 7/11/18 at 6:57 am to Crewz
For the most part Miller is a stand at the 3 point line guy. He does drag a defender out with him, but Hood can score from anywhere on the court so he's one of those guys you can run around on offense creating chaos for the defense. As long as it stays under $10 the contract shouldn't be a bad one.
My main concern is as others have stated, does locking into Hood for more than one year potentially derail other opportunities at a bigger upgrade. But if you can get him on a team friendly deal and he flourishes in this system then he becomes a positive trade piece like Moore.
My main concern is as others have stated, does locking into Hood for more than one year potentially derail other opportunities at a bigger upgrade. But if you can get him on a team friendly deal and he flourishes in this system then he becomes a positive trade piece like Moore.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 7:51 am to TigerinATL
Yeah, the case against Hood would be a pure opportunity cost one. How much does it limit other moves? I think it makes it harder to be a 2019 FA player, but I never really bought into that anyway. I don't think it effects the 2019 February trade deadline that much. You can either turn Hood into an asset if he's good. Or, if he's good, it makes Moore expendable in a trade.
If the cost is Miller or Diallo or a 2nd or a combination of those and a contract for 6-9 per for 2-3 years, I think I'd pull the trigger. Then, go sign Devin Harris at PG for a year and another big on the minimum. Go into camp with that roster and see how the market plays out as trade deadline nears.
If the cost is Miller or Diallo or a 2nd or a combination of those and a contract for 6-9 per for 2-3 years, I think I'd pull the trigger. Then, go sign Devin Harris at PG for a year and another big on the minimum. Go into camp with that roster and see how the market plays out as trade deadline nears.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 8:26 am to Crewz
Yea my question was really in the context of “is a bench player worth $7-9 mil when we still need a starting SF, starting PG, and a back up big?”
I see the skill set & fit in New Orleans. And I know organizations like the Pelicans have to gamble on the Rodney Hoods of the world because chance of landing Kawhi or Butler in FA is slim to say the least. I just wonder if there isn’t better risks out there
I see the skill set & fit in New Orleans. And I know organizations like the Pelicans have to gamble on the Rodney Hoods of the world because chance of landing Kawhi or Butler in FA is slim to say the least. I just wonder if there isn’t better risks out there
Posted on 7/11/18 at 8:33 am to DeionDeion
I don't think they can get a better player NOW. But I can see the scenario where they are patient and get a better guy in February.
We tend to agree that Etwaun is worth his contract, if not slightly underpaid. Hood, in this system has a much higher ceiling than Moore. Much higher. Moore has a higher floor. Hill would likely live up to the contract, but that doesn't mean he is worth the opportunity cost.
We tend to agree that Etwaun is worth his contract, if not slightly underpaid. Hood, in this system has a much higher ceiling than Moore. Much higher. Moore has a higher floor. Hill would likely live up to the contract, but that doesn't mean he is worth the opportunity cost.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 10:16 am to Crewz
I'm just not on board with paying Hood MLE money or possibly more right now, for more than 1 year.
I'd rather try to get Bembry or Oubre using the trade exception, and then trade for Beverley.
I'd rather try to get Bembry or Oubre using the trade exception, and then trade for Beverley.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 10:40 am to Crewz
Am I crazy to think that Hood would be a better fit as a starter if he were to come here?
As it stands now, I would think that Randle is starting (otherwise why did he choose to come to New Orleans on a one year deal?)
Randle
Davis
???
Holiday
Payton
You have a hole at SF (obviously). Do you start Moore there? Hood at least has length to defend wings (something that Moore lacks). IMO, you can't start Hill there with Randle and Payton in the starting lineup. If Hill is out there he needs to be paired with Mirotic and a guard other than Payton (Clark or Moore).
As it stands now, I would think that Randle is starting (otherwise why did he choose to come to New Orleans on a one year deal?)
Randle
Davis
???
Holiday
Payton
You have a hole at SF (obviously). Do you start Moore there? Hood at least has length to defend wings (something that Moore lacks). IMO, you can't start Hill there with Randle and Payton in the starting lineup. If Hill is out there he needs to be paired with Mirotic and a guard other than Payton (Clark or Moore).
Posted on 7/11/18 at 10:52 am to Epic Cajun
I dont' think it's crazy to think that. He might be a great fit, or he might be a terrible fit. I'd tend to lean more that he'd be a good fit, but i'm not giving him a multiple year deal to find out. I'll pay him whatever he wants for one year to find out. I think he's realized what can happen if you go to a team you don't fit on. He comes here and fits, we'll keep him, or he'll get the opportunity to make money somewhere else.
if he works out for us at the SF, and we want to move forward with him, then getting a PG like Kemba would be the main target going forward.
The biggest thing I dislike about Hood is I think he's a crappy defender. I think Utah masked a lot of his deficiencies there and that's why they were willing to give him up. That being said, if Payton can turn the corner on the defensive side b/c he has the potential to be a really good defender, then we can mask Hood's deficiencies as well. Whole lot easier to play D on the perimeter when AD gets to roam the paint.
If Solo can get back to his preinjury self, and stay above 35% from 3, and we could get Kemba, then I like the lineup of Kemba/Jrue/Solo/Niko/AD with Payton/Moore/Hood/Miller/Randle coming off the bench. That's a good scoring lineup off the bench.
and it doesn't matter who starts, Niko or Randle. All three will play 30 minutes. I would think it will vary team by team which one is utilized more during crunch time.
if he works out for us at the SF, and we want to move forward with him, then getting a PG like Kemba would be the main target going forward.
The biggest thing I dislike about Hood is I think he's a crappy defender. I think Utah masked a lot of his deficiencies there and that's why they were willing to give him up. That being said, if Payton can turn the corner on the defensive side b/c he has the potential to be a really good defender, then we can mask Hood's deficiencies as well. Whole lot easier to play D on the perimeter when AD gets to roam the paint.
If Solo can get back to his preinjury self, and stay above 35% from 3, and we could get Kemba, then I like the lineup of Kemba/Jrue/Solo/Niko/AD with Payton/Moore/Hood/Miller/Randle coming off the bench. That's a good scoring lineup off the bench.
and it doesn't matter who starts, Niko or Randle. All three will play 30 minutes. I would think it will vary team by team which one is utilized more during crunch time.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 10:59 am to Epic Cajun
I think Moore is the starter, and Jrue defends whichever 2/3 creates.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 11:07 am to TeddyPadillac
quote:
The biggest thing I dislike about Hood is I think he's a crappy defender. I think Utah masked a lot of his deficiencies there and that's why they were willing to give him up.
Teddy, I agree with this, but as a counterpoint, I think we could do the same in our system. If we have Jrue, Payton, Randle, and AD around him those are all solid defenders. We could then hide Hood on the worst offensive player on the end. I also think Erman could work him a lot to improve. He's too athletic not to be an average defender in my opinion.
By doing so you allow a second unit of whomever the PG is, Moore, Hill, Niko, and possibly Diallo or another vet big. In that case your bench has a plus defender in Hill (when healthy) and two other defenders who can hold their own in Moore and Niko. Hill could be a ball handler with that unit, a role I thought he was pretty decent at his first year here.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 11:31 am to TeddyPadillac
quote:
The biggest thing I dislike about Hood is I think he's a crappy defender.
Well there is a reason why he's available.Two way 3s are signing max deals. On the flip Hill gives you nothing offensively
Im with Crew, people are remembering him from his short stint in CLE. There was a point in UTA when he was on a lot of "breakout" lists. I think he fits with the theme of guys that could really thrive in our system, like Randle and Payton
We keep saying, "if we can get a kemba", "go get Beverly", "trade for Middleton", "dennis schroder" ... Let's come back down to planet earth and explore things that may actually be possible
Posted on 7/11/18 at 12:22 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
We keep saying, "if we can get a kemba", "go get Beverly", "trade for Middleton", "dennis schroder" ... Let's come back down to planet earth and explore things that may actually be possible
Like trading two firsts and throw away players for an all NBA player, or trading a mid to late 1st and one of the worst contracts in the league for Niko?
Posted on 7/11/18 at 12:25 pm to BallHawk
quote:
If we have Jrue, Payton, Randle, and AD around him those are all solid defenders.
Despite the hype out of college, payton has been a very poor defender
This write up by a magic website sheds some light on payton defensively LINK
Edited to correct the link
This post was edited on 7/11/18 at 12:33 pm
Posted on 7/11/18 at 12:35 pm to SCLSUMuddogs
That link doesn't seem to work. Would love to read it.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 12:36 pm to LouisianaJoseph
Here is the address without a hyperlink.
LINK
Eta: well that didn't seem to work. If you type "elfrid payton defense" into Google its one of the first articles. "Deconstructing elfrid paytons disastrous defense"
LINK
Eta: well that didn't seem to work. If you type "elfrid payton defense" into Google its one of the first articles. "Deconstructing elfrid paytons disastrous defense"
This post was edited on 7/11/18 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 7/11/18 at 12:49 pm to SCLSUMuddogs
Thanks. Hopefully Erman and Jrue can help with pick and roll defense, he looks pretty bad on that article but so promising in college. I still have faith, I love his game.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 12:57 pm to SCLSUMuddogs
I'm not goign to say he's a good defender, b/c the numbers throughout his NBA career have not been good, but he has all the physical tools to be an excellent defender. I am the first to say that having the smarts to be a good defender outweigh the physical tools. Bruce Bowen doesn't have the physical tools to be the best defender, but he was smart, quick enough, and had a great big man patrolling the paint.
We'll find out how smart, or how stupid Payton really is playing with Jrue/Solo/Niko/AD.
I watch those videos and the optimism in me says that i could just as easily blame the screener for not communicating, or simply not being good enough. So Payton jumps a pick and forces Schroeder left, leaving him one on one with Vucevic. Schroeder gets an easy layup. Nothing really wrong with that play if your funneling him to AD. I'll take my chances every time if it's Schroeder trying to get to the rim on AD.
We'll find out how smart, or how stupid Payton really is playing with Jrue/Solo/Niko/AD.
I watch those videos and the optimism in me says that i could just as easily blame the screener for not communicating, or simply not being good enough. So Payton jumps a pick and forces Schroeder left, leaving him one on one with Vucevic. Schroeder gets an easy layup. Nothing really wrong with that play if your funneling him to AD. I'll take my chances every time if it's Schroeder trying to get to the rim on AD.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 1:45 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:
Like trading two firsts and throw away players for an all NBA player, or trading a mid to late 1st and one of the worst contracts in the league for Niko?
We def helped out to desperate franchises. You’re talking about assets given up for year and a half rentals. Buddy headlined a deal for disgruntled cousins.. you don’t have that asset any longer. Niko is a dime a dozen stretch 4 who forced the Bulls hand to deal him- we had to give a 1 to dump Asik
You’re prepared to dole out a 1st or “young asset” for a half year of kemba or Patrick Beverly? Like every team needing a PG won’t be calling CHA. Bucks just gonna give up a guy like Middleton for check diallo and a 2nd according to our fans
Posted on 7/11/18 at 1:52 pm to GynoSandberg
Barnes is probably the most realistic target that fits. But you have to wait for Dallas to become sellers first.
This post was edited on 7/11/18 at 1:53 pm
Posted on 7/11/18 at 1:55 pm to TigerinATL
Someone nailed the MoPete comparison in the Rodney Hood balling out on Pelicans highlight that MM linked.
Popular
Back to top



2




