Started By
Message

re: Hollinger: Jrue + JJ for Wiggins, Looney, #2, Minn 2021

Posted on 8/21/20 at 10:20 am to
Posted by LouisianaJoseph
Denver
Member since Apr 2018
1390 posts
Posted on 8/21/20 at 10:20 am to
Aren't they tied to a percentage of the cap? As in, they have no choice. For those who have those contracts.
Posted by RosyFinchBOYZ
Member since Oct 2017
421 posts
Posted on 8/21/20 at 10:34 am to
quote:

Aren't they tied to a percentage of the cap? As in, they have no choice. For those who have those contracts.


The contracts aren’t tied to the cap except in the first year. They are a percentage of the cap the year it is signed then set raises off of that number.
Posted by Macintosh504
Leveraging Salaries University
Member since Sep 2011
52561 posts
Posted on 8/21/20 at 10:36 am to
I do this if the Knicks want Wiggins and the 2 pick for their 8th pick, future first, and 2023 Mavs pick (top10 protected). Or at least something along those lines. Wiggins can’t be a part of this team for 3 years and the second pick is just meh to me.
This post was edited on 8/21/20 at 10:39 am
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
11865 posts
Posted on 8/21/20 at 10:53 am to
quote:

I'd do it in a heartbeat.

We would be able to find someone to take Wiggins into cap space without having to give up any assets
What team would take Wiggins contract into space without attaching major assets? Not a chance.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110709 posts
Posted on 8/21/20 at 11:01 am to
quote:

What I meant by consider I meant that this board has to get used to the idea that it will be discussed.

Not "Griffin needs to do this trade".
Fair enough, and makes sense.

I'm just a huge no on this trade idea.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32394 posts
Posted on 8/21/20 at 11:02 am to
quote:

The contracts aren’t tied to the cap except in the first year. They are a percentage of the cap the year it is signed then set raises off of that number.
And, to add to that. Only max contracts are tied to a percentage of the cap.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
38667 posts
Posted on 8/21/20 at 11:24 am to
quote:

Just so we're all clear:
$29,542,010
$31,579,390
$33,616,770


HOT TAKE

wiggins' contract is better than klay thompson's contract
Posted by Long_Time_Lurker
Member since Jun 2019
483 posts
Posted on 8/21/20 at 11:37 am to
I think this works:

GS: Jrue, JJ
NYK: Wiggins, #2
Pels: Looney, #8, Minn '21, NYK '21, '23 Mavs, salary match for Wiggins (Gibson, Ellington, Ntilikina)

Seems to be a tad overpay for the Knicks. Depends on how they feel about Wiggins. Personally, I would give up getting #8 this year to get NYK's '21 unprotected. That way for '21, you have your own lottery pick, Knicks lottery pick and Minny's Top 3 protected. You could draft a guy AND flip two high lottery picks for a vet next year.
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
14179 posts
Posted on 8/21/20 at 11:57 am to
Any team that feels he can help them and has cap space i.e. NYK, Atlanta, Phx, not sure on their cap but maybe even Sacramento
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
15169 posts
Posted on 8/21/20 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

HOT TAKE

wiggins' contract is better than klay thompson's contract



While Klay is out injured, sure, but when he's healthy, he's actually a useful player. Klay is definitely a slight overpay, but Wiggins is a gross overpay.
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
14179 posts
Posted on 8/21/20 at 12:05 pm to
Knicks should have a max slot available to use, so theoretically they wouldnt even have to send back any salary.

I would let them keep their 21 pick, im targeting Okoro in this draft. He allows me to move BI to the 2, and I have a buttload of cap space to go get a 1 (Kyle Lowry or Fred Van Vleet) with some fight in him to teach these young guys how to fight and win.
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
15169 posts
Posted on 8/21/20 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

Wiggins is vastly overpaid but he isn't terrible as a player, so it's not like we'd be buying him out


He's basically a replacement level player who will take up about 1/3 of your cap the next 2 years.
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
15169 posts
Posted on 8/21/20 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

future 1sts for taking on a bad contrac


The future Warriors first is likely a shitty pick. I'd rather picks at the top of the 2nd than bottom of the first for CBA reasons.
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
8757 posts
Posted on 8/21/20 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

Golden state is going for embiid. He fits with them and is more tradable than Jrue. They’re a mess over there.


Philly isn’t just going to give away Embiid. There were reports where they wouldn’t trade him for AD. And he’s more tradable than Jrue lol? Embiid is always first or second team all nba and on the NBA defensive teams. Jrue hasn’t sniffed an All star game since the Philly days in a really horrible East at the time....
This post was edited on 8/21/20 at 12:15 pm
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61449 posts
Posted on 8/21/20 at 12:08 pm to
A 4 teamer with the Knicks and Pistions that includes Jrue and Lonzo

Warriors - Jrue
Pels - Taj Gibson, Elfrid Payton, Wayne Ellington, Minny 2021 1st, GSW 2022 1st, future Knicks/Mavs pick
Pistons - Wiggins, Bobby Portis, #2 pick, future Knicks/Mavs pick
Knicks - Blake Griffin, Lonzo Ball

I think this is a good framework.

The Knicks get star power in Blake and Lonzo
The Pistons get draft capital to rebuild
The Warriors get the best player in the deal
The Pels - meh - I'd feel a lot better if you could get the Knicks to throw in the #8, but they're already putting in 2 future picks.
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
15169 posts
Posted on 8/21/20 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

A 4 teamer with the Knicks and Pistions that includes Jrue and Lonzo

Warriors - Jrue
Pels - Taj Gibson, Elfrid Payton, Wayne Ellington, Minny 2021 1st, GSW 2022 1st, future Knicks/Mavs pick
Pistons - Wiggins, Bobby Portis, #2 pick, future Knicks/Mavs pick
Knicks - Blake Griffin, Lonzo Ball

I think this is a good framework.

The Knicks get star power in Blake and Lonzo
The Pistons get draft capital to rebuild
The Warriors get the best player in the deal
The Pels - meh - I'd feel a lot better if you could get the Knicks to throw in the #8, but they're already putting in 2 future picks.


The best asset we would be getting is top 3 protected in 2021. For us to get a top 3 pick out of that, Minny would have to get a top 3 pick for 3 straight years.
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
11865 posts
Posted on 8/21/20 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

Any team that feels he can help them and has cap space i.e. NYK, Atlanta, Phx, not sure on their cap but maybe even Sacramento


No team is taking $100 million in contracts for nothing, unless that player is a borderline star.
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
8757 posts
Posted on 8/21/20 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

Do we think the Pels can rehab Wiggins enough that it becomes at least a net neutral the year before he expires so that his contract can be used to match salaries in a trade for a star


This is the key and why I do this trade. You can probably get Wiseman or Edwards. A good player with the Minny pick. Wiggins is a starter in this league just worth maybe 1/3 of his salary. But we are young and not going anywhere while Curry, Lebron, and Kawhi are around so we need to be building the war chest for when the time is right.

If we could get a good coach to develop some of Hayes, NAW, Didi, whatever pick we make this year, the GS pick, etc, they could be used with an expiring Wiggins to bring in that third star we need. Jrue and Redick are great but not on our timeline and deserve to go out winners.

O and it f*cks LeBaby and his uni browed boo next year....
This post was edited on 8/21/20 at 12:27 pm
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
14179 posts
Posted on 8/21/20 at 12:30 pm to
And Wiggins has shown that borderline all star potential when playing within a scheme designed for him i.e. playing the 2 instead of the 3..
Posted by supe12sta12z
Tiger Town
Member since Apr 2012
10342 posts
Posted on 8/21/20 at 1:02 pm to
I wouldn’t be opposed to keeping Wiggins. He has skill and ability that we lack on the roster. It really depends on the coach that gets hired and his/her ability to get Wiggins to accept that he’s not option 1 or option 2.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram