- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What the hell happened with Rise of Skywalker?
Posted on 7/4/25 at 6:52 pm to CBandits82
Posted on 7/4/25 at 6:52 pm to CBandits82
Ive found the best way to watch Rise of Skywalker is to hit the back button on the remote and click The Empire Strikes Back.
Posted on 7/4/25 at 7:00 pm to GeauxLSUGeaux
quote:
Well maybe he wouldn't have had to bring back Palpatine if the main villain didn't get cut in half in the 2nd movie.
He still didn't have to bring Palpatine back.
Stop being dumb.
Posted on 7/4/25 at 7:13 pm to CocomoLSU
quote:
Put me down in the camp that thinks RoS isn’t bad, and almost kinda good/enjoyable for having to adjust to the absurdities of TLJ
Totally agreed. It gets more hate because a lot of people say they didn’t even watch it and refuse to do so because of TLJ
It’s a product of Johnson being a pos.
I kind of liked it except for the whole Rey is a skywalker thing at the end.
This post was edited on 7/4/25 at 7:14 pm
Posted on 7/4/25 at 7:22 pm to CBandits82
Still better than last Jedi somehow
Posted on 7/4/25 at 8:02 pm to 9Fiddy
quote:
It was JJ Abrams’s effort to undo what Rian Johnson did. Unfortunately it was so fricked there really was no recovery.
kinda crazy they didn’t have 1 guy do all 3 movies…
I knownpeople blame Kathleen Kennedy but it seems like they let Rian Johnson take it wherever he wanted which was the real frick up
Posted on 7/4/25 at 8:42 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
Sorta. It was still shite and didn't make any sense whatsoever, but it's not like he was left with much choice. Who was going to be the main antagonist in the final film of the trilogy if not an old foe?
So who then other than an old foe like Palpatine? Rian Johnson limited Abrams's options dramatically by the events of Episode VIII.
The main antagonists were the ones responsible for the story of this trilogy.
Posted on 7/4/25 at 11:22 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
kinda crazy they didn’t have 1 guy do all 3 movies…
Who in their right mind spends billions on Star Wars and somehow forgets to come up with a story before launching a sequel trilogy? You had the biggest IP on the planet and didn’t even bother sketching out a basic plot. That’s not just incompetence. That’s legendary stupidity.
Then you start swapping directors annd gave them storytelling control and wonder why everything feels like a train wreck. That’s not a creative choice. That’s a meltdown in slow motion. And the fact that no one at Disney stopped and said, “Hey, maybe we should have a consistent vision before we shovel hundreds of millions into this,” tells me everything I need to know about who’s running the show.
And let’s talk about the biggest slap in the face. You had Luke. You had Leia. You had Han. And you didn’t put them in a single scene together. Not one. That was the emotional payoff fans waited decades for and you tossed it out like it didn’t matter. You had gold in your hands and you threw it in the trash.
Then you turn Luke Skywalker into a bitter coward who gives up on the galaxy because of a vision about a moody kid. The same Luke who stood in front of Vader and the Emperor without flinching suddenly folds like a lawn chair. What were you smoking when you signed off on that?
And don’t even get me started on the tone. Since when is Star Wars supposed to feel like a Marvel gag reel? Crank call jokes. Slapstick. Forced comedy that lands like a brick. It went from mythic space saga to Saturday morning parody in the blink of an eye. Nobody wanted this.
Honestly the most impressive thing about this entire disaster is how they managed to fumble the easiest win in pop culture history. All they had to do was not screw it up. Just give people what they came for. But no. They went full clown show and lit the whole thing on fire. Star Wars should have been an unstoppable money-printing machine for the next fifty years. Instead they pissed off the fanbase, tanked the brand, and made people nostalgic for the prequels. That takes real talent.
The kind of talent only Disney’s movie division seems to have these days.
Posted on 7/4/25 at 11:46 pm to drizztiger
I haven't watched TLJ since it first was available to stream so I can't recall how the story was setup for the finale. Snoke was dead, the Luke showdown happened and they showed other kids that had force powers. I'm fairly certain it was going to be Rey vs Kylo Ren and also Leia's movie so Carrie Fishers death really didn't help.
RJ was set to direct the final movie but I'm guessing the fan reaction lead to the pivot back to JJ. This is on Kennedy et al for not having a plan for all 3 movies. Also, neither here nor there but JJ is a really bad director, everything he directs somehow feels like a TV show if that makes sense.
TLJ is a better movie and if one of my kids asked to watch it with me tonight I would. I will not watch ROS.
RJ was set to direct the final movie but I'm guessing the fan reaction lead to the pivot back to JJ. This is on Kennedy et al for not having a plan for all 3 movies. Also, neither here nor there but JJ is a really bad director, everything he directs somehow feels like a TV show if that makes sense.
TLJ is a better movie and if one of my kids asked to watch it with me tonight I would. I will not watch ROS.
Posted on 7/5/25 at 12:05 am to 9Fiddy
quote:
It was JJ Abrams’s effort to undo what Rian Johnson did. Unfortunately it was so fricked there really was no recovery
I agree with this. It was an attempt to undo a massive F Up.
Not perfect by a country mile but more enjoyable than its’ predecessor
This post was edited on 7/5/25 at 12:09 am
Posted on 7/5/25 at 12:26 am to TIGERSTORM
quote:
RJ was set to direct the final movie but I'm guessing the fan reaction lead to the pivot back to JJ.
Colin Trevorrow was initially slated to direct Episode IX, not Rian Johnson.
quote:
In August 2015, Walt Disney Studios chairman Alan Horn announced that Trevorrow would direct Star Wars: Episode IX (2019).[26] Trevorrow and Connolly subsequently began writing the script for the film; titled Star Wars: Duel of the Fates.[27][28] However, in August 2017, writer Jack Thorne was brought in to rewrite the script due to dissatisfaction by Lucasfilm with their script.[29][30] By September 2017, Trevorrow was let go from the project due to creative differences and was replaced as director by Star Wars: The Force Awakens director J. J. Abrams, who co-wrote the script with Chris Terrio.
LINK
The script for that version is out there if you want to read it.
Star Wars: Duel of the Fates
Posted on 7/5/25 at 12:38 am to 3nOut
I agree they never wrote the story of the trilogy. Instead they made up stuff on the spot.
Where they fricked up is they should have hired some real Star Wars nerds to write the story. Instead of throwing a bunch of money at some egomaniacs trying to make it in their shitty vision.
Where they fricked up is they should have hired some real Star Wars nerds to write the story. Instead of throwing a bunch of money at some egomaniacs trying to make it in their shitty vision.
Posted on 7/5/25 at 6:31 am to CBandits82
Several things:
1. Somehow the idea of three separate visions in one trilogy got sold as a good plan. It was not. Got a mixed bag of crap to deal with in last film.
2. TLJ never expanded and built on TFA plot: no back story on new order, knights of Ren, jedi training, link to events in original trilogy, etc.
3. Killing off major characters as a plot device was very popular at the time. They killed off iconic and interesting new characters too early.
4. The only common plan in the films was to try to replace Luke as the most powerful compelling character with Leia. Carrie Fisher was never really going to be physically capable of carrying the entire trilogy. Really bad idea that ended up having catastrophic bad consequences.
1. Somehow the idea of three separate visions in one trilogy got sold as a good plan. It was not. Got a mixed bag of crap to deal with in last film.
2. TLJ never expanded and built on TFA plot: no back story on new order, knights of Ren, jedi training, link to events in original trilogy, etc.
3. Killing off major characters as a plot device was very popular at the time. They killed off iconic and interesting new characters too early.
4. The only common plan in the films was to try to replace Luke as the most powerful compelling character with Leia. Carrie Fisher was never really going to be physically capable of carrying the entire trilogy. Really bad idea that ended up having catastrophic bad consequences.
Posted on 7/5/25 at 8:42 am to Broski
quote:
He still didn't have to bring Palpatine back. Stop being dumb.
Dumb? The main villain HE CREATED was killed in the second movie. You want him to just bring in some new, random main villain in the third and final film? Stop being a fricking retard. You can thank Rian Johnson for that dumbass decision.
This post was edited on 7/5/25 at 8:44 am
Posted on 7/5/25 at 9:09 am to CocomoLSU
quote:
Put me down in the camp that thinks RoS isn’t bad, and almost kinda good/enjoyable for having to adjust to the absurdities of TLJ.
The entire trilogy is fine, just forgettable. Disney made star wars dull. Fans just shrug their shoulders now when a project is announced. It's unfortunate.
The one thing I do find funny is some fans hating the ST so much they've tried convincing themselves that the prequels aren't bad anymore. The prequels are still freaking awful.
Posted on 7/5/25 at 9:57 am to cssamerican
Well-written, well said, cssamerican.
One detail I would add to this--after Han is killed in TFA, they show Chewbacca walking right past Leia, as if nothing had happened, in favor of Leia embracing Rey I think. Kind of encapsulates what you wrote about them not giving fans of the OT any emotional payoff / due / satisfaction.
Like you wrote, they basically decided to improvise a movie trilogy / make a movie trilogy up on the fly. A lot of times writers have the ending in mind and work toward it--instead of this where it's just, hey, maybe this happens, then maybe this happens. Complete incomprehensible chaos.
This is extra stupid when you remember that a very talented writer, Timothy Zahn, had long-ago written an entire sequel trilogy of novels that would have given any writer / director an absolutely amazing jumping off point / starting point to bounce ideas off of. Grand Admiral Thrawn winning with genius instead of just being a dark side of the Force bad guy--they can't think of anything that good / new anymore, just either do an obvious remake of A New Hope or something so awfully amateur-hour bad that it ruins the whole franchise.
Something else I would add--the zeitgeist was peak woke when the ST was made. The all-female Ghostbusters came out during the ST, which even though I've never seen it--it sounds like that movie also makes its main villain a composite of its primary fanbase. The ST was supposed to be for girls what the OT had been for boys. That would have been fine, but the creative and production team behind the ST couldn't hide the fact that they hate the fanbase demographic of the OT.
I bet you any money the girls who the ST was made for--I bet you they forgot about it after leaving the theater. I guarantee you they don't discuss it anymore. It means nothing to them. Whereas here we are so many years later discussing how it all went so wrong, because there was something from our childhood we enjoyed, and these Disney cretins not only s*** all over it, but they did it on purpose and don't even care because they hate our a**es. Somehow it's our fault that the ST sucked. The Force was female all right--irrationally bitter, unexplainably vengeful and cruelly full of unbridled contempt for its largely male fanbase.
I enjoy watching the RedLetterMedia reviews of movies these days more than the movies themselves. An endless ocean of trash--I think Mike of RLM put it this way.
What I would have done for ROS--Kill Bill Vol. 1 and Rey hunts down the Knights of Ren and gets to Kylo at the end. Sounds terrible, but I think it's better on paper than what we ended up with. Bringing back Palpatine... dear God.
One detail I would add to this--after Han is killed in TFA, they show Chewbacca walking right past Leia, as if nothing had happened, in favor of Leia embracing Rey I think. Kind of encapsulates what you wrote about them not giving fans of the OT any emotional payoff / due / satisfaction.
Like you wrote, they basically decided to improvise a movie trilogy / make a movie trilogy up on the fly. A lot of times writers have the ending in mind and work toward it--instead of this where it's just, hey, maybe this happens, then maybe this happens. Complete incomprehensible chaos.
This is extra stupid when you remember that a very talented writer, Timothy Zahn, had long-ago written an entire sequel trilogy of novels that would have given any writer / director an absolutely amazing jumping off point / starting point to bounce ideas off of. Grand Admiral Thrawn winning with genius instead of just being a dark side of the Force bad guy--they can't think of anything that good / new anymore, just either do an obvious remake of A New Hope or something so awfully amateur-hour bad that it ruins the whole franchise.
Something else I would add--the zeitgeist was peak woke when the ST was made. The all-female Ghostbusters came out during the ST, which even though I've never seen it--it sounds like that movie also makes its main villain a composite of its primary fanbase. The ST was supposed to be for girls what the OT had been for boys. That would have been fine, but the creative and production team behind the ST couldn't hide the fact that they hate the fanbase demographic of the OT.
I bet you any money the girls who the ST was made for--I bet you they forgot about it after leaving the theater. I guarantee you they don't discuss it anymore. It means nothing to them. Whereas here we are so many years later discussing how it all went so wrong, because there was something from our childhood we enjoyed, and these Disney cretins not only s*** all over it, but they did it on purpose and don't even care because they hate our a**es. Somehow it's our fault that the ST sucked. The Force was female all right--irrationally bitter, unexplainably vengeful and cruelly full of unbridled contempt for its largely male fanbase.
I enjoy watching the RedLetterMedia reviews of movies these days more than the movies themselves. An endless ocean of trash--I think Mike of RLM put it this way.
What I would have done for ROS--Kill Bill Vol. 1 and Rey hunts down the Knights of Ren and gets to Kylo at the end. Sounds terrible, but I think it's better on paper than what we ended up with. Bringing back Palpatine... dear God.
This post was edited on 7/5/25 at 10:50 am
Posted on 7/5/25 at 10:26 am to Broski
quote:
JJ bringing Palpatine back was more of a middle finger to the OT than anything Rian did.
No, ruining Luke was easily the greatest offense
Posted on 7/5/25 at 10:55 am to Upperdecker
quote:I want to see the fan reaction to a LOTR where Frodo just says frick it and throws the ring into a urinal.
No, ruining Luke was easily the greatest offense
Non-SW fans have no idea how ridiculous the Luke shite was. Intentionally shitting on the lore and mystique for no other reason than shock and subverting expectations is weak minded behavior.
Posted on 7/5/25 at 11:54 am to Broski
quote:You keep saying this, but offer no other options or ideas as to who should be the main villain in the finale of the trilogy.
He still didn't have to bring Palpatine back.
That isn’t excusing the movie. It is still crap and the Palpatine choice was shite.
Most people agree with that.
Who should have been the big bad then?
Snoke - Dead
Kylo - massive pussy who was beaten twice
Hux - the most cucked character in Star Wars history
Who would you pick?
This post was edited on 7/5/25 at 11:56 am
Posted on 7/5/25 at 12:22 pm to Broski
My theory is that they brought Palpatine back to try to keep old fans interested and buying tickets and minimize how many would skip ROS after how bad TLJ was. If TLJ hadn’t been such an abomination, they’d have had no need bring Palpatine back to appeal to fan nostalgia for OT characters to sell tickets.
Popular
Back to top


0










