Started By
Message

re: Oprah's ultra-PC ‘Wrinkle in Time’ stung with bad reviews as ‘cringeworthy’

Posted on 3/8/18 at 3:37 pm to
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

This has nothing to do with right or left, but about taking creative license to shape a message that was not necessarily the intention of the original story.


If you are upset that a film version of Wrinkle in Time espouses liberal politics, then you clearly have never read the book nor are familiar with its author.
Posted by The_Joker
Winter Park, Fl
Member since Jan 2013
16316 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

I don’t want to see a fantasy movie with very famous people cast in major roles


Like Lord of the Rings?
Posted by boxcarbarney
Above all things, be a man
Member since Jul 2007
22712 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

DuVernay, who directed the civil rights film "Selma," told the New York Times she selected Australian actor Levi Miller to play Meg’s friend “because that was so powerful, to show a white boy following a black girl” throughout the movie.


For a group of people who claim to want a post-racial America, they seem to focus an awful lot on race, don't they?

And there's this gem:

quote:

The review by Yolanda Machado features the quote, “Because of this film, my daughter will never question that she can be strong.”


If my daughter can only derive strength from a movie, then I've failed as a parent. These people are all psychos.
This post was edited on 3/8/18 at 3:47 pm
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36105 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 4:19 pm to
This sucks

The book is great

ETA - I read it over three decades ago and loved it. It will be interesting to go back and read it again. I may have missed major themes when I read it in elementary school.
This post was edited on 3/8/18 at 4:24 pm
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
98920 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

If you are upset that a film version of Wrinkle in Time espouses liberal politics, then you clearly have never read the book nor are familiar with its author.


Thank you. It was pretty damn progressive reading it when I was a kid (I’m in my 30s FWIW). Female sci-fy writers in the 60s weren’t exactly common and there were a ton of criticisms when it was released that her Christian themes in the books were “too liberal” for the church at the time. It’s literally on the ALA’s 100 Most Frequently Challenged Books List because it challenges typically religious beliefs and combines themes like philosophy and science with religion.

If you’re complaining about an adaptation being too PC, you probably need to readjust your meter. Now if it sucks because of acting or shitty adaptation that’s legitimate.
This post was edited on 3/8/18 at 4:24 pm
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
14160 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 4:34 pm to
“I don’t care what anybody thinks about it,” she told the Times.

What a great business model. I’m sure their shareholders are thrilled.
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
14160 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 4:44 pm to
“because that was so powerful, to show a white boy following a black girl” throughout the movie“

...is very different from..

“challenges typically religious beliefs and combines themes like philosophy and science with religion.”


Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79980 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

If I can get an 8yr old to take a critical look at something like this, why can’t the rest of America take it upon themselves to do the same.


Probably because the rest of America is very selective about what they spend $20-$50 on when/if they go to the movies and/or they would rather wait to spend $5.99 to see it On-Demand.
Posted by auburn32
Auburn
Member since Dec 2009
2167 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 5:09 pm to
In the trailer Mindy seems like she is about to crack up laughing while delivering her serious lines
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67007 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

Okay, are there still any last defenders of TLJ?


I still don't think it's as bad as Fox Moulder does, but I can't even defend it anymore.
Posted by P-Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
1869 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 5:49 pm to
quote:

Oprah is frickin insufferable. Her being in a film is a guarantee I won’t see it.


I'm going to go out on a limb here and say you're probably not the movie's target demographic. On top of that, for every guy that says this, there's probably a middle-aged or older woman that will go just because of Oprah.
Posted by JustinBRLA
Melbourne, FL
Member since Sep 2006
1095 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

What makes it Ultra-PC? Have they changed the book that much?


It's considered Ultra-PC because they cast different ethnicities instead of having everyone be white.
Posted by LSU alum wannabe
Katy, TX
Member since Jan 2004
26964 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

going to go out on a limb here and say you're probably not the movie's target demographic.


I read that book 2-3 times we had to win one “Newberry (or Dewberry?) Award Winning book” per year in elementary school. I was excited as hell when I saw the preview... until I saw Oprah. It’s going to lean too heavily on thePC and empowerment and not on the Orwellian type stuff I thought was cool.

I’ll just read the book again so I will remember what to mock when it is released on HBO or free on Netflix.
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
71505 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

Probably because the rest of America is very selective about what they spend $20-$50 on when/if they go to the movies and/or they would rather wait to spend $5.99 to see it On-Demand.



The Emoji Movie made 86 million in the US.
Posted by P-Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
1869 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

I read that book 2-3 times we had to win one “Newberry (or Dewberry?) Award Winning book” per year in elementary school. I was excited as hell when I saw the preview


Oof. I'm sorry they're killing your childhood.
Posted by JumpingTheShark
America
Member since Nov 2012
22889 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 6:57 pm to
The target demographic should be people who liked the book, which I did. Also something about Oprah being in it really shatters my suspension of disbelief. She’s just not an actress and I’m really aware I’m looking at Oprah and not a character.
This post was edited on 3/8/18 at 6:59 pm
Posted by touchdownjeebus
Member since Sep 2010
24833 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 11:43 pm to
Ive read the book, just read it actually, after my daughter read it. I’m not upset about a movie I’ve never seen, but from what I glean one of the most important plot devices, Aunt Beast, is not in the movie. How in the hell can you not include the character central to the message of the book?

EDIT: there are several “messages” in the book, but the one I referenced being the primary theme carried and delivered by Meg.
This post was edited on 3/8/18 at 11:49 pm
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79980 posts
Posted on 3/9/18 at 12:55 am to
quote:

The Emoji Movie made 86 million in the US


$86 Million over a period of 6 weeks.

$86 Million divided by an average of $10.85 per ticket rounds out to a grand total of...

Just over 7.9 million tickets purchased over a span of 6 weeks. That means less than 3% of the U.S. population cared enough to see it in theaters, even if none of those were multiple viewings.

Contrast that to Black Panther, which has earned over $516 million domestic since February 16th (3 weeks).

That's an average of $172 million per week, or almost 16 million actual ticket sales each week.
Posted by DownSouthJukin
Coaching Changes Board
Member since Jan 2014
27185 posts
Posted on 3/9/18 at 1:00 am to
quote:

I'm not saying you're right or wrong, but an apartment in a big city isn't the same as one in bayou lapoot.


But it's still an apartment.
Posted by 0
Member since Aug 2011
16624 posts
Posted on 3/9/18 at 1:58 am to
quote:

“I don’t care what anybody thinks about it,” she told the Times. “I know it’s $100 million for the studio. They’ll be fine.”


I have a feeling this comment is going to come back to bite her.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram