- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/7/20 at 9:20 am to Athos
quote:
Lol.
Texas gonna get skullfricked and lose this case.
No vested interest or care in the show, but good luck proving the “has no serious, literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.”
This is not about winning a case, and it'll probably never go to trial and they know it, it's about a community's way of sending a message. It's in the headlines now, we're talking about it, job is done for them.
This post was edited on 10/7/20 at 9:21 am
Posted on 10/7/20 at 9:23 am to PowerTool
quote:
Woodville TX sending a message to the world.
That they'll sue people over movies they haven't seen?
Posted on 10/7/20 at 9:28 am to Jack Ruby
This is a slippery slope. Can you imagine the outrage if Lolita came out in 2020?
Posted on 10/7/20 at 9:28 am to Tidemeister
and when it doesn't go to trial Netflix will be vindicated and the DA will look like an uptight puritan
Posted on 10/7/20 at 9:47 am to alajones
quote:
Chances that jurors actually watched the entire movie? I did and don’t recall seeing any prepubescent genitalia.
The fact that you watched it is disturbing.
Posted on 10/7/20 at 11:46 am to PEEPO
quote:
I'd love to hear all the perverted emails they exchanged created the marketing material.
I bet you would
Posted on 10/7/20 at 11:46 am to Hu_Flung_Pu
quote:
The fact that you watched it is disturbing.
The fact that you're disturbed by people watching films you haven't watched is disturbing.
Posted on 10/7/20 at 11:51 am to Jack Ruby
quote:
Netflix indicted on kiddy porn charges in Texas for airing "Cuties"
There are thousands of creepy beauty pageants and dance competitions every year in Texas that sexualize young girls. I'm sure Tyler is no exception.
Posted on 10/7/20 at 1:56 pm to alajones
alajones says child porn is only bad if there is actual nudity
Posted on 10/7/20 at 2:06 pm to Tidemeister
quote:
This is not about winning a case, and it'll probably never go to trial and they know it, it's about a community's way of sending a message. It's in the headlines now, we're talking about it, job is done for them.
So they were just trying to get more people to watch it?
Posted on 10/7/20 at 2:10 pm to Jack Ruby
Never heard of it
But I don't want Netflix to go away they make good series just stop with the weird ya freaks
Coach on Hoops is hilarious btw
But I don't want Netflix to go away they make good series just stop with the weird ya freaks
Coach on Hoops is hilarious btw
This post was edited on 10/7/20 at 2:11 pm
Posted on 10/7/20 at 2:29 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
So they were just trying to get more people to watch it?
Yes, in part. It bolsters their "cause" and raises their cred, which is what this is all about.
Don't think for a second that their constituency reaching out to sample the video so that they can cast judgement would come as a shock to the people filing this case.
Posted on 10/7/20 at 5:54 pm to LSU Patrick
quote:alajones actually watched the movie after seeing what had to be an insane amount of bullshite on social media. Turns out, most of the people chiming in clearly never watched the movie. It’s uncomfortable and cringe worthy, but it’s supposed to be.
alajones says child porn is only bad if there is actual nudity
These girls are only displaying behavior they see already by girls not much older then them. There is no “child porn” whatsoever in this movie.
ETA: Where this movie really hits home is the addictive behaviors that surround social media and damn phones. Kids (and frankly many adults) are chained to these damn things. I’ve witnessed a 12 year old clawing an SRO over a fricking phone. Girl’s self esteem is tied to likes and comments on social media.
This movie pisses people off because it’s in your face. The viewers are forced to see what current cultural mores and norms are doing to kids.
This post was edited on 10/7/20 at 6:02 pm
Posted on 10/8/20 at 12:01 am to Fewer Kilometers
quote:
The fact that you're disturbed by people watching films you haven't watched is disturbing.
young girls doing dances in skimpy clothes....
Fewer Kilometers: I'm in.
Posted on 10/8/20 at 12:14 am to Jack Ruby
They're obviously not going to win this but it's a shot...saying, we don't like the crap you're putting out and this is not our community standars.
Posted on 10/8/20 at 12:53 am to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Exactly. This case will ultimately go nowhere. I expect it will be dropped in a few months. It's really more about sending a signal to Netflix that their agenda is on notice.
Hollywood shits on small town USA all the damn time, it's about time they started catching shite back.
Hollywood shits on small town USA all the damn time, it's about time they started catching shite back.
Posted on 10/8/20 at 5:58 am to alajones
quote:
These girls are only displaying behavior they see already by girls not much older then them. There is no “child porn” whatsoever in this movie.
Imagine what behaviors young people will display when they see adults defending kiddie porn because Hollywood told them it is art.
Posted on 10/8/20 at 7:32 am to alajones
quote:
This movie pisses people off because it’s in your face. The viewers are forced to see what current cultural mores and norms are doing to kids.
The ole "we'll show you how bad sexual exploitation of children is by sexually exploiting children" routine, huh?Posted on 10/8/20 at 7:42 am to alajones
quote:
It’s uncomfortable and cringe worthy, but it’s What I like
Fify
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News