- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: HBO’s ‘Game of Thrones’ Prequel Will Explore ‘Internalized Misogyny’ and ‘Patriarchy’
Posted on 8/10/22 at 9:02 pm to dawgfan24348
Posted on 8/10/22 at 9:02 pm to dawgfan24348
quote:
All I see is refusal to to actually respond to the comments
He directly responded to Bronc's comments you insufferable twat.
Posted on 8/10/22 at 9:12 pm to Centinel
He definitely responded, that’s for sure
Didn’t really say anything though
Unless you consider virtue signaling to the white identity culture warrior crowd…which I’m guessing you absolutely do
Didn’t really say anything though
Unless you consider virtue signaling to the white identity culture warrior crowd…which I’m guessing you absolutely do
Posted on 8/10/22 at 9:21 pm to Bronc
Oh frick off you sanctimonious shitstain. You’re probably the worst poster on this entire forum, and that’s saying a lot with the likes of Jay Are and dawgfan hanging around.
Take your racist fricking takes and shove them up your arse.
Take your racist fricking takes and shove them up your arse.
This post was edited on 8/10/22 at 9:23 pm
Posted on 8/10/22 at 9:26 pm to Centinel
Don’t you have some teenagers to be ogling on the OT or helping your wife, the breadwinner, move?
Bitch
Bitch
Posted on 8/10/22 at 9:47 pm to Bronc
quote:
If you reread my post, I explicitly pointed out to you that part of how patriarchy and misogyny are explored in this universe is simply through the contrasting ways in which different cultures have different levels of equality and freedom for woman
And by thinking that GRRM did this to every main female character basically says he's a hack that can't write anything other than misogyny. The books would be boring as hell if that's what the theme is for all these women. But for some reason you think to make a point about the new show you have to say that the entire other series is the sane way, which is just not true.
quote:
She managed to earn her way by basically over excelling to prove her worth and gain some semblance of respect
Or that she was just a bad arse on her own. It came natural to her, she fit in. Just because she was a great raider doesn't mean she was an overachiever. There weren't a bunch of jealous women sitting around mad that she was an overachiever. She was raised hard, just like a son would have been, and she turned out hard.
quote:
The show is even more explicit in pushing the patriarchal elements into the forefront when the Euron/Yara confrontation comes to a head.
Yes, she lost out on the crown. She didn't cry about it. She not the first person to not get what they want. It's not like there wasn't a case to be made for Euron and he got it for free. He had a claim. On one hand she wasn't respected, on the other hand she was respected more than Theon by their dad and other men. Those things can even themselves out. And again, she's not a bland arse character who's arc, according to you, it's just one of the many females with the same theme.
But you've never had a give and take conversation on here the entire time you've been on TD, not sure why I even responded. But sure keep on chanting "internalized misogyny" like your the M/TV boards Don Lemon and I'm sure you'll keep getting the Tucker Carlson's of TD to respond.
Posted on 8/10/22 at 10:12 pm to dawgfan24348
quote:
You literally haven’t even seen the first episode yet here you are melting down and making up shite like wokeism in order to justify your anger.
Try again, sparky. That post was strictly about GOT and how it wasn't woke.
Posted on 8/10/22 at 10:18 pm to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
And by thinking that GRRM did this to every main female character basically says he's a hack that can't write anything other than misogyny. The books would be boring as hell if that's what the theme is for all these women.
Again, you should read what I actually wrote instead of wasting all these words arguing straw men
I said that each of those characters I listed explored and touched upon issues of misogyny and patriarchy, to different degrees and in different manners, and that it was done in a multitude of ways in the books/show, some just comparatively, some pretty on the nose. I did not, and would not ever say that is ALL their stories and arcs amounted to. Just as that will not be the case with Rheanarya and Alicent in this series, despite the incessant melts from the reactionary gallery thinking GRRM put all his energy into retconning one of his favorite eras in his lore to virtue signal to some made up boogieman caricature of the “woke libs”
quote:
Yes, she lost out on the crown. She didn't cry about it. She not the first person to not get what they want. It's not like there wasn't a case to be made for Euron and he got it for free. He had a claim. On one hand she wasn't respected, on the other hand she was respected more than Theon by their dad and other men. Those things can even themselves out. And again, she's not a bland arse character who's arc, according to you, it's just one of the many females with the same theme.
I’m not even sure what the frick you are arguing here? Are you under the impression that patriarchal illustration, commentary, or deconstruction is only ever present in a story if women cry about losing out to a man?
And are you really trying to seemingly defend the Iron Isle’s from charges of patriarchy? You know, the culture GRRM makes crystal clear in his novels that it is in fact deeply patriarchal(salt wives, woman are default seen as not fit to command ships)? And that Asha compensates for that accordingly, yet it still is a factor in doing her in.
Frankly I’m not even sure what you think this gaslighting is meant to achieve?
Here is GRRM being explicitly clear that Westeros is a patriarchal society, that his female characters reflect different ways of dealing with that, and he tries, through his writing, to illustrate and express the pains and frustrations for woman living under that sort of society. Though also wanting to show woman of strong character and ability that defy those barriers put in front of them and how much he takes pride in not having the sort of stock and tropish sexualized characters so many in fantasy write when it comes to woman, trying to actively turn those tropes on their head
LINK
This post was edited on 8/10/22 at 10:27 pm
Posted on 8/10/22 at 10:19 pm to UndercoverBryologist
quote:
If Game of Thrones had premiered after 2015, it would have gotten the wrath of 30 anti-woke MTV board threads per season.
Disagree. Those female characters were written as being strong, they weren't written specifically to be "warriors against male toxicity". The characters' primary goals weren't to prove themselves equal nor superior to men in male-dominated areas but to just fricking survive (well, except for Brienne but she had a strong backstory which explained why she was that way rather than just introducing her in that struggling light and leaving her there).
As I said before, it's the difference between good writing and woke dreck.
Posted on 8/10/22 at 11:22 pm to The Pirate King
quote:
discussing misogyny in a completely made up planet in universe that doesn’t exist. Smart
It'll be done metaphorically brah!
Posted on 8/11/22 at 1:51 pm to Bard
You’re right and neither is this show, but the themes this article is talking about was present in the GoT only difference is GoT didn’t have articles like this talking about shite like “smash the patriarchy”
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:35 pm to jatilen
quote:
We don’t only explore it through a level of women being shut down and the patriarchy, but also go in-depth about the internalized misogyny that women are constantly faced with, and the competitiveness. Alicent and Rhaenyra’s relationship is at the forefront of that conversation
I was much happier when people didn't speak like bad corporate powerpoint presentations.
In GOT women and men are faced with everything from being sold into sexual slavery to being mocked as a dwarf and sent to the wall to die for being a bastard. None of this was due to some conspiracy of males to specifically subvert females. In fact, both Cersei and Daenerys excelled where men failed in part because they were women. Having a "feminist spin" that needs to constantly bang a drum about "the patriarchy" injects wokeism into the picture and undercuts what Martin could do on a number of levels without pointing and jumping up and down virtue signaling. I'm not sure Hollywood has much restraint left and the above quote certainly isn't promising.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 3:22 pm to jatilen
So another series to avoid then, like the rings of power.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 3:41 pm to Bronc
The problem is liberals can't tell the difference between forced storytelling and good storytelling. We all know monogyny was a big part of the first GOT. Can't speak for all posters but most weren't arguing the point you can't seem get away from. Preachy storytelling is out of place and very easy to spot. When they are already saying political buzzword before the show airs, it doesn't give people hope for good storytelling.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 4:19 pm to StrongOffer
quote:
The problem is liberals can't tell the difference between forced storytelling and good storytelling. We all know monogyny was a big part of the first GOT. Can't speak for all posters but most weren't arguing the point you can't seem get away from. Preachy storytelling is out of place and very easy to spot. When they are already saying political buzzword before the show airs, it doesn't give people hope for good storytelling.
Misogyny and patriarchy are buzzwords? lol, ok, I guess.
On a side not, considering "liberals" write/direct/star in 95% of the TV and film that people praise on this site, the crowd of public opinion would seemingly disagree there.
Anyways, the story of Fire and Blood is literally a story that's central conflict arises from a dispute amongst the ruling family between a male and female heir to a male's only throne.
And two of the primary characters in this story are woman navigating and trying to achieve power within that context.
I really would love you to explain how that story is told without bumping up to issues of misogyny and patriarchy? Or why the storytellers become "preachy" for exploring that space or letting audiences know about it in interviews?
Posted on 8/11/22 at 4:22 pm to Bronc
quote:
Or why the storytellers become "preachy" for exploring that space or letting audiences know about it in interviews?
Because it's a very broken record in that industry right now and it's fully expectant that "exploring that space" will be a very one-sided and preachy exploration.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 4:42 pm to Bronc
quote:
On a side not, considering "liberals" write/direct/star in 95% of the TV and film that people praise on this site, the crowd of public opinion would seemingly disagree there.
Congrats you finally understand the point of almost everyone who you’ve been arguing with!
Posted on 8/11/22 at 4:47 pm to AUCom96
quote:
Because it's a very broken record in that industry right now and it's fully expectant that "exploring that space" will be a very one-sided and preachy exploration.
Right, but stop and think for a second here.
Why do you think these actresses began talking about this in a media blitz interview?
Do you think the interviewer of a center-left media blog said " How are you liking the weather today?" and the lead actresses responded with patriarchy AND misogyny!
Of course not lol, they were asked a series of questions and one of them was assuredly something along the lines of "How do you feel this show does at handling the patriarchal nature of the world these characters inhabit?"....And they answered it
Probably right before or after they asked about how much sexposition will be in this one(according to Matt Smith, way more than even he was expecting) and which was her favorite costume.
Breitbart, which exists off clicks and retweets, found a pot of gold narrative: nerd fantasy and their audiences conditioned sensitivity to things labeled "woke"
And what do outraged culture warriors do? They click and retweet and that gets more clicks!
Almost like it's in their financial interest to stoke these culture wars....
This post was edited on 8/11/22 at 4:49 pm
Posted on 8/11/22 at 5:01 pm to Bronc
quote:Exactly, the topic isn't the issue. How they are tackling it is the issue. And that has changed over the last 5 years. 10 years.
On a side not, considering "liberals" write/direct/star in 95% of the TV and film that people praise on this site, the crowd of public opinion would seemingly disagree there.
quote:Most posters addressing you have stated multiple times this isn't the concern. Take a breath and try to understand what people are saying instead of arguing with yourself.
I really would love you to explain how that story is told without bumping up to issues of misogyny and patriarchy?
quote:Watch this review of the movie "Men". This guy explains it better than I can.
Or why the storytellers become "preachy" for exploring that space or letting audiences know about it in interviews?
Men Review
The current trend of movies/shows is to preach to the audience instead of telling a good story. When we hear the creators of said show saying it's about creating a conversation around misogyny it raises a red flag. If you can't understand the point we're making, I tried my best to explain.
Popular
Back to top



1







