Started By
Message

From the files of "Duhhh" Live Action Moana bombs at the Box Office

Posted on 7/12/26 at 9:20 pm
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
85144 posts
Posted on 7/12/26 at 9:20 pm
Not sure I ever saw a single ad, aside from the trailer posted on here

LINK

quote:

“Moana” failed to make a splash at the box office, earning $43 million from 3,827 North American theaters in its opening weekend.

Those ticket sales, though enough for No. 1 on box office charts, are disastrous given the live-action “Moana” remake has a massive $250 million production budget — and that’s before Disney‘s hefty marketing spend. Arriving in theaters a decade after the original 2016 animated musical and less than two years after the sequel, “Moana” underscores the trickiness of timing in terms of Disney’s live-action remakes. Wait too long, à la “Snow White” and “Dumbo,” and there’s not enough cultural resonance; go too soon, and there’s not enough nostalgia to bring audiences back to theaters for something they’ve seen before (and can readily watch on Disney+).


I will await the Disney Defender Squad to tell us that everyone is wrong, and this is a huge success. . .from a certain frame of mind

Or that it was racist white Youtubers that caused it to fail

Those are some of their greatest hits.
This post was edited on 7/12/26 at 9:21 pm
Posted by Frac the world
The Centennial State
Member since Oct 2014
21851 posts
Posted on 7/12/26 at 9:25 pm to
Nobody, and I mean nobody, wanted a live action Moana only 10 years removed from the original and the 2nd one is only 2 years old

I’m glad it’s bombing, frick the Rock
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
72263 posts
Posted on 7/12/26 at 9:26 pm to
Must be all the wasis’ fault
Posted by PuertoRicanBlaze
Book Board Admin
Member since Apr 2024
7664 posts
Posted on 7/12/26 at 9:52 pm to
This post was edited on 7/12/26 at 9:53 pm
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
66500 posts
Posted on 7/12/26 at 9:57 pm to
Both actors are way too old. I have no idea why they decided that Moana should be a teenager and Old Rock is just creepy and out of place.
Posted by DesScorp
Alabama
Member since Sep 2017
10606 posts
Posted on 7/12/26 at 10:01 pm to
Those Variety posts are example XXX of why you don't hate the media enough.
Posted by Jay Are
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2014
6295 posts
Posted on 7/12/26 at 10:16 pm to
According to that headline, the "trolls" are making a criticism that is itself inaccurate, which makes it not hypocritical.

And that makes the claim that Variety hates white people based on a misunderstanding of mutual exclusivity super fukking stupid, especially to anyone who's read more than 2 articles on Variety, a publication notorious for celebrating the achievements of white pople while concern trolling the achievements of people of color.


And yes, Rooad, no one gave or gives a frick about this Moana. Not even our resident Disney accountants have felt the need to weigh in with a made up number of much money Disney could lose. Which will likely be a lot.
Posted by StansberryRules
Member since Aug 2024
5503 posts
Posted on 7/12/26 at 10:22 pm to
At this point isn't Disney running out of material to "live action" mutilate?

They've already done all their golden era classics, they've done all their renaissance era classics, they did a bunch of their B tier films as well, and now they've resorted to remaking stuff that was very recently made.

Just looked over the list and what's even left as an option? Pocahontas? Tangled? Frozen?

Or do they just start the process over and start remaking everything again?
This post was edited on 7/12/26 at 10:23 pm
Posted by Hoops
LA
Member since Jan 2013
8337 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 12:24 am to
Have they done Tarzan?
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
74757 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 12:28 am to
Moana was a bad movie to redo. They skulls have gone deeper into movies that were good but didn't do so well. Like Emperors new groove or sword and the stone.
Posted by jmcwhrter
Member since Nov 2012
8087 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 3:59 am to
quote:

Have they done Tarzan?


Or Pocahontas
Posted by Gusoline
Jacksonville, NC
Member since Dec 2013
11124 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 4:03 am to
quote:

$250 million production budget


For fricking what
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
24886 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 4:17 am to
I’ve never seen the original and we enjoyed this new one. I don’t get the hate for it, cute movie but insane to spend $250 million on it
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
116528 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 6:56 am to
quote:

Those Variety posts are example XXX of why you don't hate the media enough.


You think you do.

But, you don't.

And will never, ever be able to.
Posted by Free888
Member since Oct 2019
3387 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 7:06 am to
quote:

For fricking what


Catering
Posted by ouflak
Manchester, England
Member since Jul 2021
617 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 7:36 am to
quote:

I’ve never seen the original and we enjoyed this new one. I don’t get the hate for it, cute movie...


For me this is a fair take. My kids were just at the right age to want to see 2016 Moana with its magic and music and humor when it first came out. They liked it. I liked it. Life has gone on and now, perhaps sadly, they have aged out of that type of movie. But if you have kids that are of that age and none of you had seen the first.... And if the studio stayed pretty much true to the original, I don't know why you wouldn't like it. Even an aged Rock Johnson wouldn't put you off because, for you, that would be your first impression.

quote:

...but insane to spend $250 million on it


This could easily be described as a movie where they are expecting to rake it in on the family crowd and merchandising over time. Sure, they'd probably like to have summer-blockbuster-like numbers, but it's not necessarily a requirement for them to still cash in.
This post was edited on 7/13/26 at 7:38 am
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
94257 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 8:05 am to
When I heard about this my first reaction was the guy in scrubs taking the mask off "but why" gif

When I saw a clip of the Rock trying to live up to the animated version of himself in the original I knew it was going to bomb.
Posted by jp4lsu
Member since Sep 2016
7052 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 8:07 am to
I don't understand making a live action version when it is all still going to be CGI. You have CGI or animation with a real person inserted. It's just dumb.

Shows like Cinderella, Tangled, Snow White, Sleeping Beauty, make sense because you can actually film live scenery for the entire movie.
Posted by arktiger28
Member since Aug 2005
5490 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 8:08 am to
I have three daughters. They loved the original and I actually preferred it to most everything else my kids watched over and over growing up. I would imagine we were the prime target. But we’ve had no desire to watch this. It seems like it wouldn’t even be that live action. Just real actors in front of a bunch of CGI. And I would imagine facial expressions are limited compared to the original animation. I just don’t see the point.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
91009 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 8:10 am to
Well every Disney movie is a feminist love fest.


So let's make another.





first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram