Started By
Message

Dune Part 2 does not live up to the hype.

Posted on 3/8/24 at 11:39 pm
Posted by LawnmowerMan
Member since Jan 2024
28 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 11:39 pm
I was hearing it was a top 3 sci fi film ever..I saw someone in another thread calling it on par with Star Wars/Empire Strikes Back...Laughable. It was visually gorgeous and the sound design was incredible, it should win both, but the scattered clapping in the sold out theater did not feel as if I just watched one of the greatest sci fi films ever.

Fury Road was the last one I went to that I remember the audience having a visceral response.

ETA: No chemistry between Zendaya and Chalamet
This post was edited on 3/8/24 at 11:47 pm
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
28836 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 11:50 pm to
I enjoyed it a lot. A whole lot.

But the hype was greatly overblown.

Good to very very good movie but nowhere near the best scifi movie in the last whatever years. I’d rather watch Interstellar, Fury Road, Gravity, Arrival, or BR2049.
This post was edited on 3/8/24 at 11:51 pm
Posted by Dirk Dawgler
Where I Am
Member since Nov 2011
2479 posts
Posted on 3/9/24 at 12:09 am to
For sure. But there will always be those so in love with a certain book or sci-fi world that they are susceptible to wish-casting a movie based on that world into something far greater than it actually is in reality. This is one of those scenarios.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 3/9/24 at 12:22 am to
quote:

But there will always be those so in love with a certain book or sci-fi world that they are susceptible to wish-casting a movie based on that world into something far greater than it actually is in reality. This is one of those scenarios.
Or maybe they actually liked it to that degree, even if others didn’t.

I’m seeing it tomorrow (or technically today), but Villeneuve is one those directors where there was something about his style that appealed to me, even before I realized all those films were by the same director. I had this same convo with a friend the other day, who didn’t know which films he directed, and had the same realization when I started listing them.
Posted by LawnmowerMan
Member since Jan 2024
28 posts
Posted on 3/9/24 at 12:27 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/30/24 at 12:43 pm
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
28836 posts
Posted on 3/9/24 at 12:43 am to
quote:

Villeneuve is one those directors where there was something about his style that appealed to me, even before I realized all those films were by the same director. I had this same convo with a friend the other day,


Agreed. I had seen Arrival, Sicario, BR2049, Enemies, Prisoners, and Dune 1 before I realized it was all the same guy.
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
39171 posts
Posted on 3/9/24 at 1:29 am to
It was mostly boring but the ending was good. Timothee Chalamet and Austin Butler had really good performances. Overall I still say the Lynch version is better in just about every way but the Villeneuve movies have their merits.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
24781 posts
Posted on 3/9/24 at 2:03 am to
Ending was super meh.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
51501 posts
Posted on 3/9/24 at 6:37 am to
I thought it was a good, not great film. There was a lot going on and a lot of it wasn't fleshed out enough.
Posted by Hayekian serf
GA
Member since Dec 2020
2513 posts
Posted on 3/9/24 at 7:02 am to
quote:

Zendaya


Easily the worst part of the movie.

The dozen or so scenes of her just staring with her stupid face were annoying.

But it was still a great movie.
I prefer the first one but I really enjoyed this one as well.
Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
8324 posts
Posted on 3/9/24 at 7:09 am to
I haven’t read a single word of the books and it was very possibly my favorite movie of the last decade. It 100% lived up to the hype from where I was sitting.

It’s okay that some people just have different opinions than you. You don’t need to explain away those opinions as wish-casting just because they don’t conform perfectly to your perspective. Frankly, that’s a rather odd mental state to default to
Posted by scottydoesntknow
Member since Nov 2023
1978 posts
Posted on 3/9/24 at 7:23 am to
Despite not really buying TC as being a badass, I thought it was one of the best scifi movies ive ever seen
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
51366 posts
Posted on 3/9/24 at 8:37 am to
Doesn't get you emotionally. There's no pull or tug. I mean, in LOTR, we start identifying with Frodo or feel for him and Sam. Paul, we really don't in this movie. He's not a bad actor. I liked him in The King. It's more the scriptwriting than anything.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55439 posts
Posted on 3/9/24 at 9:32 am to
quote:

Paul, we really don't in this movie.


I don't think we are supposed to.
Posted by Handsome Pete
Member since Apr 2019
1308 posts
Posted on 3/9/24 at 9:38 am to
It was really good, but I enjoyed Dune part 1 significantly more. Oscar Isaac in particular was missed.



Hot take: the first 1/2 to 2/3 of Lynch's Dune was just as good. It just fell apart after Paul joined the fremen. The special effects hold up, including the sandworms. Sting as Feyd >> Austin Butler as Feyd and I'm not kidding.
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
31542 posts
Posted on 3/9/24 at 10:04 am to
quote:

I thought it was a good, not great film. There was a lot going on and a lot of it wasn't fleshed out enough.


This. Still a great movie but I actually prefer a lot of Denis’s other films and certainly prefer T2, Empire and Aliens over it. But it’s still a banger.


Like I said before, having a third movie so the second could focus on fleshing things out would have been *chefs kiss
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
77952 posts
Posted on 3/9/24 at 10:05 am to
quote:

The dozen or so scenes of her just staring with her stupid face were annoying.
pretty sure I'd be happier with just about any cutting room floor film than the 2 or 3 wasted minutes from her resting bitch face scenes.

They added nothing to the film.
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
31542 posts
Posted on 3/9/24 at 10:07 am to
quote:

He is one of the greatest director-cinematographers of his time and he is a "shower" who has admitted to hating dialogue.



Couldn’t agree more. And I’m a big fan of his. I’m also just drawn more to a Tarantino style where the dialogue is everything. There’s something just as enticing as a well written scene as an amazing image
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
77952 posts
Posted on 3/9/24 at 10:09 am to
quote:

Like I said before, having a third movie so the second could focus on fleshing things out would have been *chefs kiss
I thought there was going to be a third to wrap up the first book and when they flew through it and the emperor was landing I was like whoa what? Wait!

I would have rather seen a much longer version of the sardoukar vs Freeman battle.

Also it's been 50 years but didn't Paul only try to convert a tiny arse drop of water and wear in a coma for weeks? What was this reverse sleeping beauty crap with Zendaya they stuck in the film?
Posted by RougeDawg
Member since Jul 2016
5824 posts
Posted on 3/9/24 at 10:18 am to
I agree. Reviewers comparing this to Empire Strikes Back and a new standard for sci-fi films got me pretty hyped up. I think years of shitty movies has lowered the bar a lot.

Very good movie that I would watch again. But I didn't walk out of the movie feeling amazed. Would say it is in the same tier as Fury Road, Blade Runner 2049, Dred.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram